And with the local recording, we'll go with the local recording begun, then we go and check it on Ann Coulter. That's it, it's over then we organized the death squads for the people who wrecked America. You know what do you call people you can't call food? Enemies. And if we want to divide our society into arms, camps, and enmity, all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing. Elatical edge of the event has turned into an opportunity for the left to push a racial and radical agenda. Implementing their radical agenda is the only thing they care about. They're bad actors. What they want to do here is ramp their radical agenda down your throat. This is great Americans. These are people that want to see great things that they've got to do. You know they try and build a life here. But of a radical agenda, it's not a radical agenda. Let's go. The second die. All right, on with it. Welcome to the radical agenda. To show about timeless ideas and news at a day and whatever's going on your mind, it's 217-688-1433. Yes, this agenda is quite radical and welcome to it. This 56th episode of the Sixth Stage of the Pogrum today is February 23rd, 2024 is the current year. It's a Friday as usual 9.30 pm, USC, and we are coming to you live once again from my undisclosed location, where I'm head-time headline, I should say. Today at Revolver News, warns that conservatives will get wrecked by a new law into consideration in Florida. The piece linked in the headline, sites former Trump administration official Stephen Miller warning that to Bill, which aims to modify and expand libel laws, will not have the effect that it pursues because, quote, there is no Florida equivalent on the right of a New York City jury on the left. Miller further notes that a jury of conservatives will bend over backwards to reach a, quote unquote, fair decision. Or conclusion, I should say. Though unsurprising, it is perhaps worthy of note and of some amusement, of course, that I recall no outcry for Miller at Florida's lay, a law is aimed at curbing anti-semitism. His concern for freedom of speech seems limited to allowing the dishonest to run rampant, and he is altogether less concerned with laws punishing people who tell the truth. Setting that aside for now, Miller is obviously correct so far as the asymmetric law fair component is concerned, conservatives and the right more broadly, whether lawyers, jurors or litigants, tend to have a greater respect for the legal system than their leftist counterparts. They do not file frivolous lawsuits, they do not bring flimsy indictments, they do not commit perjury, they do not reach verdicts for reasons other than the facts of the case. They recuse themselves over the slightest appearance of a conflict of interest. The left on the other hand does all of these things, they brag about it on television, they act shocked when anyone suggests that they should be doing anything else. The recent upheavals in the life of one Robert Rondo provide a fine example, Narii Word has been uttered by the self-styled respectable right about his persecution or that of his cohorts. Rondo has twice had his federal charges of conspiracy to violate the Riot Act dismissed by a district court judge in California, in well-articulated decisions that explain in great detail the circumstances surrounding the case. Rondo was just arrested for the third time on those same charges yesterday, though the allegations are from more than six years ago. Growing up in flushing queens, Rondo is given harsh lessons that his earnestly adolescence on the dangerous veil-eagle-immigration. His neighborhood was plagued by MS-13 gang members who terrorized his friends and neighbors. To those gang members, Rondo became known as El Diablo Blanco, Spanish for the White Devil, because he was not the type to be bullied. In the year 2009, Rondo was caught on surveillance camera, stamping one of those gang members. Other footage from that incident showed this gang member racing toward Rondo and his associates wielding a club. That MS-13 gang member was a twice-deported illegal immigrant, and one of those deportations stand from his being in possession of an illegal firearm. Rather than give Robert Rondo the keys to the city as a sane society would have done, he was prosecuted for a gang assault of that incident. It was his first arrest. Rather than face a jury, he pleaded guilty and was sent to a New York State prison for two years. There, Mr. Rondo was further educated on the realities of racial conflict in America. Those lessons combined with more textual study over the course of his life helped you form his worldview. That view is at the heart of something that came to be known as the Rise Above Movement or RAM, which Rondo founded with some associates in California in the year 2017. Though branded as a sort of Nazi fight club, the group's charges pertained to acts not alleged to be racially motivated. Rather, they stand accused of going to places where they expected violent antifa criminals to show up intent on attacking folks who could not defend themselves, and beating those diseased little shits into the ground where they fucking belong. To the best of my knowledge, and I've done some research on this subject, there exists not a single instance in which an innocent person claims to have been assaulted without provocation by Robert Rondo. All of the people he stands accused of harming or conspiring to harm are violent criminals. There's no dispute about that. Yet without the slightest bit of shame, federal prosecutors indicted Rondo and his associates for conspiring to violently oppose mere speech. It is the embodiment of what has become something of a catchphrase on this program where in the left says, our violence is speech and your speech is violence. They go around attacking people for saying things they disagree with, and when those people defend themselves, the criminals cry victimhood and say that their first amendment rights are being violated, all the while calling for the abolition of that very amendment. The hypocrisy of this was not lost on federal district court judge Carmack J. Carney, who in 2018 dismissed the charges against all the ram defendants before him on the grounds of the government's application of the riot act in this instance was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. To Miller's point, a conservative prosecutor would have shrugged his shoulders and said, hey, when some you lose some, we'll get him next time, hopefully, and allow that decision to stand. But not the leftist pit bulls who pursued Robert Rondo and his associates. They went to the far left Supreme, sorry, the far left 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to appeal that district court judges dismissal. And they succeeded in that appeal. Some of Rondo's associates, notably Ben Daley, Tom Gillin and Michael Micellas, were taken into custody and ended up pleading guilty to those charges. They were handed sentences ranging from 27 to 37 months in federal prison. Rondo had fled the country before he could be apprehended again and a warrant was issued for his arrest. For years, Rondo traveled Europe and he managed to do this although he was later discovered to be on the secretive no-fly list maintained by the US government. During his tour of the motherland, Rondo planted the seeds for what would become known as active clubs. These clubs promoted what he called a 3.0 lifestyle, which was articulated in part in a 2021 ep, in a 2021 essay he wrote titled, Bad Boy's Good Habits. Quoting from that essay, Rondo explains the attraction to the bad guy a bad boy archetype character. Quote, why this attraction? This can be answered in two parts. First in our modern, domesticated world where man is trapped inside a cage made up of rules, laws, bureaucracy. We all wish to break free from the chains of society and be the bad boy that places his own trail, not caring what anyone else thinks. That is why there is such an appeal to this character type. It also should be pointed out that this is not a new phenomenon, just look to the wild west days in huge fascination and admiration for the rebels outlaws and bad boy types. Always the defiant anti-hero has attracted people, especially among rebellious youth. This leads to the second part of the bad boy and is a phenomenon as old as time itself. That is the younger generation rebelling against the previous. Today this is mainly seen as something negative since all recent generations have been ushered further toward cultural Marxism and disregarded for traditionalism. But one would be mistaken to think that this is the only way it's ever been. It was not that far ago in 1920 Rome when bad boys dressed in black shirts were marching in the streets handing out fascist pamphlets, getting into bar room brawls with the opposition. The older generations scorned them as troublemakers and daydreamers. In this, in turn, this rebellious youth-young generation spurned the previous one as weak thinking and stuck in its aristocratic ways. These young radicals, full of optimism and passion, wanted a new way that drew in other risk takers, idealist artists and outlaws that also shared this rebellious sentiment against what was in place. The same can be said about the essay in 1930 Germany or even further back to the original bad boy Julius Caesar, who his older peers hated for his lack of respect for the Senate hierarchy and troublemaking. So, although the last few generations have all been coerced to head further left, now it's our time to rebel against the older status quo. Good end of quote. Thus defined, Rondo is not speaking of a criminal archetype. He may find himself on the side of a jail cell lacking a keyhole due to the nature of political warfare, but his aim is ultimately to hold those keys. He aims to become the state and impose order on society. This is clarified further as he explains the good habits component of the phrase quoting for Rondo. The second part of the slogan, good habits, makes the slogan complete because just being bad boys is not enough for people to revere. For example, take the antagonist, bill the butcher from gangs of New York. Although he chops people up with a meat cleaver from time to time, he possesses good habits that make him likeable and relatable. Consider his loyalty to race and country or the bravery he shows when faced with opposition, all noble habits which earn respect from the outsider. I call these habits instead of traits because they are not natural gifts, but need to be practiced and internalized. For example, courage comes from constantly testing yourself in a position that you will have to display it. That is what makes it a rare quality and why people revere these types of characters. Another thing to point out is to why Bill the butcher is admirable is that his actions are not because he engages in senseless violence aimed blindly at the world around him. Instead, Bill the butcher has goals at ambitions, style and grandeur. Now take another movie antagonist, leather face from the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Unlike the charismatic Bill, leather face has no good habits or redeemable qualities and instead represents the nihilistic elements of society and selfishness. He serves no greater aim but just fills his sadistic pleasure while raging blindly at the world around him for his suffer perceived injustices. This is not someone people would support or want to associate with, only the most nihilistic and debraid could relate in any way to this archetype. Although leather face is widely known, it's only for shock value while Bill the butcher is the anti-hero and admire because he emulates bad boy with good habits. It's the end of the quote from Rondo. Whatever your thoughts on Bill the butcher, the comparison here with leather face is an apt one. Most Americans are taught that the Bible says thou shalt not kill. A more reasonable translation states thou shalt not murder. Killing is not a crime anywhere in the world. Killing is perfectly legal everywhere. When killing becomes murder varies from place to place and somewhere in between we usually have varying levels of manslaughter. All of mankind rick veers, killers of one sort or another. Soldiers in police most notably are insane societies. Given and honored status for their bravery in the face of danger and their willingness to use violence to stop bad actors from destroying the things we value. It is the murderer we despise and for good reason. The style and grandeur component is important to understand when speaking of Robert Rondo. Though he has done a number of interviews written several essays and published a number of his own podcast episodes, his means of communicating have less to do with words than aesthetics. If you look at anything from the active clubs, will to rise or associated clothing line and brandings and you will notice a consistent quality in the imagery and videos as well as a lack of verbiage and common to right wing movements and groups which are frequently heavy on language. This focus on aesthetics I surmise is largely responsible for the success of Robert Rondo's European adventures. Following the active clubs and will to rise associated telegram channels, once seized throughout the United States and throughout Europe, sharp images of physically fit men, training, celebrating and holding up brand of events. The first two are the banded banners which note their diverse locations, including since Rondo's March of 2023 arrest, images calling for Rondo's release. These images noting little but the groups affiliation and geography nonetheless communicate very clearly what they are about. As a writer and a speaker, I struggle to articulate how this has done myself. It is a skill I plainly lack and admire tremendously with what I struggle against becoming envy. Of course, the United States federal government could not possibly allow such a thing to exist. As noted, Mr. Rondo is captured by authorities in Romania just under a year ago and extradited to the United States to face the same charges which were dismissed in the year 2018. While Mr. Rondo was held the Metropolitan Detentra Center in Los Angeles, I briefly had the pleasure of corresponding with him via postal mail on the Bureau of Prison's core links electronic messaging service. I had initially approached Mr. Rondo and media to rise about trying to conduct an interview with him and offered to publish on these pages and read on this podcast, whatever messages he sought to have delivered to the public. Mr. Rondo asked for no publicity from your humble core respondent, but he and I spent a couple of months getting no one another through his correspondence and I enjoyed that. Myself being a figure well known to the Bureau of Prison's and Mr. Rondo's international intrigue being of certain interests not only to law enforcement but intelligence agencies of all sorts, we both rightly expected these communications to be analyzed closely. I being still on federal supervised release, sending from my own arrest in 2020 and not typically supposed to be associating with convicted felons which Mr. Rondo happens to be consequent of the 2009 stabbing. Fortunately, I had obtained permission from my probation officer to seek out interviews with newsworthy people in the course of my professional duties for this show, but this permission was not conveyed to my new PO and responsibility for my case changed hands shortly before the beginning of this correspondence. After the US government realized no valuable intelligence would be gained from monitoring our communications, my PO invited me into his office and confronted me with the question, who is Rob Rondo? To which I offered a much brief summary than has been made here today. I was then presented with a printout of my probation conditions with the associating with Don Felens Prohibition highlighted, I calmly explained to the officer that this plainly states I'm not to do so without the permission of the probation officer and that this permission had been granted to me by his predecessor. Despite that, I was prohibited from corresponding further with Mr. Rondo. I asked permission to send one more letter explaining why I would have to sever or correspondents and this permission was granted to me by the probation officer. I dispatched just such a letter and two weeks later received it back in record turnaround time with a rejection notice from the BOP stating that the prisoner would not be informed of it ever having arrived and claiming that this letter threatened the secure operation of the facility despite it clearly having no such quality to it. I appealed this decision to the warden of that facility following instructions on the Bureau of Prison's website today, months later, I have gotten no reply. I have not published nor do I intend to publish Mr. Rondo's letters to me. They are however preserved for history of which I believe Mr. Rondo is proving an important part. It was about to become a moot point in any case because Mr. Rondo's charges were dismissed yet again this last Wednesday this time on the grounds of selective prosecution. Judge Carney's decision explained it length is reasoning. At the time the rise of Bob movement was established, leftist criminals had been terrorizing the country for years into great effect. The government chose not to prosecute almost any of their crimes and this license to destroy was put to good use by those so licensed. The emergence of resistance groups was an inevitable consequence of that lawlessness and it was only those resistance groups that the government saw fit to prosecute. This disparity and interest motivated as it clearly was by the protected content of the speech of the respective groups was unconstitutional even accepting it face value the government's unfounded assertions that Rondo it's all were motivated by a desire to suppress the speech of others. To let one group do that while prosecuting another based on the speech being expressed or suppressed was a violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The government confident as they were that the far left night circuit court of appeals would not have much use for this argument asked Judge Carney to stay Rondo's release order pending their appeal. Judge Carney denied that request stating that Rondo ought not spend another minute in their custody. So Rondo was yet again released the government yet again appeal the government yet again prevailed in the night circuit order that the decision to release Rondo would be stated with at which point Mr. Rondo became a wanted man less than 24 hours after he had been freed. Through circumstances not clear to me at the time of this riding Rondo was taken into custody the same day and is by now presumably back at the Metropolitan detention center in Los Angeles. You can send Mr. Rondo a letter and since I cannot I'd appreciate it if you would at the following address Robert Paul Rondo number 77104-112 MDC Los Angeles Metropolitan detention center PO box 531-500 Los Angeles California 9000-530 and I'll read that again before the end of the show. So go ahead grab a pen. I'd take a deep satisfaction if I came to know that Mr. Rondo was inundated with supportive letters noting that they had been prompted to send them by this tribute to him. The appellate decision has not overturn the decision to dismiss the charges the government's motion to do that is still pending Rondo is currently held against his will though he is not technically charged with a crime at this time. To proceed against Rondo the government must argue that it has every right to selectively prosecute some crimes while letting others go unpunished. The night circuit will have to grant them that right in order for the case to proceed. A decision by an appellate court constitutes a binding precedent and should the government prevail the right to select a prosecution will have near the force of a constitutional amendment. So to Mr. Miller's point it is indeed quite a quandary the right finds themselves in today. There is no equivalent to that in the prevailing legal philosophy of the right. They vigorously pursue criminal and civil penalties against those who are broadly on their side precisely to demonstrate their devotion to the law. When going after their political opponents by some contrast they are quite cautious not to allow their political views to influence or even be seen to potentially be influencing those decisions. Through such a mechanism they mimic the behavior of their enemies allowing leftist thugs to run amuck while swiftly and reliably visiting the harshest penalties upon anyone who would dare to try and stop them. If they had the slightest bit of sense every attorney right of Latisha James would be on their way to California right now to stop this precedent from being set there would be a mass mobilization to prepare for the biggest Supreme Court battle since dobs the Jackson women's health. But to Mr. Miller's point there is no equivalent on the right. And that is a state of affairs that cannot permanently persist. As I have been working on my next book about my 2010 campaign to be elected to the United States House of Representatives in New York's first congressional district I came across my first televised interview and transcribed portions of it for the book. I tend to think of near everything I've done prior to 2017 as silly libertarian nonsense but as I've gone through my old emails and YouTube videos and blog posts I've come to appreciate my younger self more than I recently did. During that interview I was discussing the subject of monetary policy and specifically the abolition of the Federal Reserve. Joseph Dobry in the host of the show asked me if this was terribly likely to happen and I stated that it was certainly going to happen one way or another. Either Congress could do so in an orderly and responsible fashion or the consequences of the Fed's behavior would eventually lead to a collapse of the monetary system and the end of the US dollar which would in effect be the end of the Federal Reserve system. While that prediction has yet to manifest itself fully in reality a series of crises have emerged each of which presented precisely that threat. We have been warned over and over and over again that the government must do this or that outrageous thing or else it would be the end of money as we know it and the world would slide into darkness and chaos. As we so slide despite those actions prices rise faster than wages Americans and people throughout the world are met with unceasing misery and anxiety and crime and violence skyrocket in reverse correlation with birth rates of civilized races. I did not say in the year 2010 that the Federal Reserve system would collapse very soon only that it would do so inevitably if it was not responsibly handled by intelligent and well-known people. Our criminal justice system faces precisely that same problem and this is well evidenced by the plight of Robert Rondo as well as the man who faced preposterous allegations in Charlottesville and it ought to go without saying the outrageous abuses suffered by yours truly. Lacking a right wing equivalent the left celebrates this cascading tell use of darkness the worst off we are the better they do and weaponizing the courts, the military, the law enforcement intelligence separate. The financial system the medical industry the media it's all part of the same despicable anti-human agenda. Robert Rondo sits today as their captive though he is not at this time charged with any crime the accusation against him does not allow she is harmed a single innocent soul for the crime of telling men to quit doing drugs and find healthier ways of getting their heart rates up the United States government has spent the better part of a decade chasing him across the planet. As they have repeatedly tried and failed to make their case he has now been apprehended for a third time should the government prevail and making the argument that the Constitution permits and demands their selective prosecution of their political opponents the right sure as hell better find the equivalent of which Mr Miller notes a lack as well as and just as importantly a set of balls with which to wield it. Two on seven six eight one four three three if you would like to be on the program and where you thought the less I have to so please do gives a call call your own radical agenda what's your agenda. I can't well so there's just crazy story the other day. At a like a Tom Clancy novel or a patient born film series. So apparently there was just a good guy who is caught trying to handle you do it material you got from the end month in the running of the. I'm sure you could be heard that story yesterday. I heard a headline about a Yakuza guy with nuclear material I did hear about that yeah I didn't read the story in any detail though. Yeah I'm not sure if he's set up or not like trying to find out the way to frame Iran trying to get the computer to get weapons. But yeah it's just crazy it's something you see would see all on how to film like. Yeah I mean it's definitely has that it definitely has that ring to it you know. Unfortunately I don't I don't know much about it so unless you could provide some some better detail and perhaps improve the audio quality your call a little bit after years and years and years of calling in without it. Do you have any else. Thank you very much for the call. Hey go buy a better phone guy it's you know I appreciate the call in any case two on seven six eight one four three three if you'd like to be on the program and I'm or you told less than I have to so please to call I got a voicemail from a fella and I'm going to play that voicemail for you now. Yeah well question for the show so I've course heard you on T.R.S. shows I've heard their arguments for giving up on politics and I've heard your arguments for marching through the institutions and I got to say I am not yet convinced of either position but it'd be possible to address this on the program. So I'm going to show namely to clarify how the T.R.S. position on politics is wrong and what actual practical advice you have for marching through the institutions and what good that might do despite what many would say is the evidence a raid against your position. So the answer is I'm not going to address it I wanted to give you your your piece my friend but you know for one I don't listen to the T.R.S. podcast I'm not going to go listen to every podcast the T.R.S. had made from the day I was arrested four years ago until now trying to find out what those arguments are. Secondly the last thing I want to do is pick a fight with the guys over T.R.S. you know we've talked about the subject on here at some length about politics you know what I know is not what T.R.S. has said on their podcast what I know is people who purport to have the same views as them come and they bring their views to me and I just discussed those views with them. And so I'm not in any position to say what T.R.S. has said wrong because I don't know what the hell they said. And if I did I'd far prefer to find some other way to address it than to be like those T.R.S. guys I don't know what they're talking about. Because that doesn't serve our purposes at all you know politics or no politics one thing that we know for certain that there's no question about whatsoever actually is that the people who want to ruin us. Like they intentionally go they stoked these conflicts between either side right and the best way for them to do that is to pick a fight between me and T.R.S. That's a proven reliable strategy that they're trying to bait us into and they've you know utilized a great effect over the years. And so you know my view of it is simply that the people who have made these arguments to me which is to say nothing of what T.R.S. has said because again I don't know is that the arguments that I've heard actually are not arguments. What I have heard is that people are complaining about a state of affairs and you know that's fine you can complain about a state of affairs that's a reasonable thing to do we're unhappy about something we articulate our dissatisfaction with it. And then we try to develop solutions to those problems that sort of how humanity works kind of. The arguments that I've been met with are that they're complaints they're not actually articulable plans to do anything people say things like oh well we need a mass movement. Okay well a mass movement means I need more people to agree with me and that's actually not a very unique claim literally every political solution. But by that's you know every every political and business and every other idea is if more people want what I want than what I want will occur that's not a unique claim in the slightest. Another thing that I hear from people often enough is again it's a most of it is just complaints they're like oh well this you know this party is controlled by this or this party is controlled by that. Well you know interestingly enough the same people will tell you that the 2020 election was above board and the only reason Donald Trump isn't president of the United States is because you know white people didn't vote for him because they're podcasters for angriot or whatever. Well if you say that the election system is above board then the people who control the parties of the primary voters and the way to solve that problem is to be one right and actually not just to be one but to influence them. And to do that you actually have to participate in the party you have to show your loyalty to the organization and if you declare your entity to the organization you want to influence then the organization is not going to be influenced by you it's pretty straightforward. And so this is not a fast solution it's not an easy solution but as a matter of fact if you know anything about life you come to realize that few things of any worth are right. If you want to try to you know improve your physical fitness what actually you're going to have to do is you're going to have to work really hard for years and then over the course of time you'll have small improvements that eventually add up to a lot. But if you basically you know show up on election day and you're like yeah I voted for this guy. Yay me. And then you don't get what you want in the course of the next four years. Well, as a matter of fact you have absolutely no right to complain right because all of the important decisions about politics are made before election day they're made by people who show up to meetings and participate and pay money you know they they volunteer their time they do a lot of hard work. And so the people who tell you not to do the hard work are basically telling you not to participate in politics and that's kind of kind of the idea and fine you know I mean maybe if they have an alternative to that great I I have not heard again not saying anything about TRS I am not going to do that. I have not heard what it is that they propose is alternative to that. For time we were told the NJP was like you know going to solve all our problems or something I'm not saying that that was the words out of you know any individual TRS podcasters mouth but you know this is the image presented by people who show up in telegram chats trying to pick fights essentially is that oh well you're so stupid for participating in the Republican party the answers to join the NJP. And you know not to pick on anybody but you know I think that I've won out that the NJP is not going to solve our problems you know. And so you know I'm happy to hear the alternative to actually doing the work if anybody has an alternative to actually doing the work I'm very interested to hear and that's what part of the reason I do an open phones radio show part of the reason that I will take a voicemail from somebody you can't show up during the live show. At 20259 97386 anybody wants to call 20259 97386 leave a voicemail whenever you know I'll be happy to play your voicemail on here and respond to it if you can't show up Fridays at 930. And so that's the best that I can do for you for now and I hope I hope it kind of addresses it. I'll just try to read this transcript first before I see if I want to play this. I'll just play it we'll just see what happens. Yeah on content I think when you were talking about going through some of the old stuff and rehashing some things and bringing it up for new listeners I think that's a great idea obviously more show prep. But yeah going back to the good old days you yelling at the broads you know protest them and all the other good stuff. Also maybe I know your name carries a reputation but collabs that's difficult but just conversations with other people open the door to different viewers. In terms of on the Friday nights maybe in some niche stuff that people aren't going to get elsewhere like manifestos or something that they won't hear at other shows but yeah that's all I got for you. Well thanks buddy I'm assuming this guy is a surreal politics member and I think he's responding to something I said on a member show and if you're listening sir thank you very much for your input there. I just yeah I'm not going to play that now because apparently you're responding to something I said on the member show so this is not I apologize for for playing it sort of off the cuff I saw your voice mail earlier while I was getting ready today and I just figured I played on the air. We'll address that at another time is what I was talking about on the on the other show. Caller you're on the radical agenda with your agenda. Hello yeah for the record Chris I didn't know who you were and I still know really who you are but I mean I stumbled I suppose I think a lot of your callers know who you are and known you for a while or known about you maybe listen to you for a few years or whatever. I just have to stumble across you on because I browse bitch you sometimes so you are on there and I said well this guy is. Kind of a fairly interesting everything but. Yeah so I really I still don't know exactly. What organizations are worth or anything like that I'm not. Okay well yeah I mean as far as the elections the main thing with the election that's a problem I mean people say there's no solution in politics. I agree to the extent that the elections are fixed in America and that's a problem that I think it's not totally impossible to solve that problem. I mean there's no there's no reason every election in the world has to be fixed I've heard that for example I've heard Germany has fair elections they I've heard that I don't know they have to show up with the right either they're sure in some of some states I mean some locales in America have. Fair elections I believe but the elections have to be tried it makes at least makes them inroads. Judicial watch claims that they get a lot of the dead people out for the rules they they found a lot of lawsuits and they tried to clean up some of the voter rolls and so forth but I mean did you have any idea that is there any possibility of cleaning up elections. Well I mean I believe that there's already been some significant progress on that as a matter of fact so I couldn't tell you off the top of my head all of the legislation litigation that has gone on. But it stands out my mind that I was watching news coverage of you know bills in state legislatures to prevent the madness that went on in 2020 you know this idea that everybody's just going to get a mail in ballot you know in their mailbox no matter when that they had you know. No matter when they had registered to vote was preposterous that happened in a lot of places in a lot of states with more reasonable legislatures they made sure that didn't happen a lot of the things that have been done in 2020. Where you know they were done through a strategy that they called Sue and settle that basically Mark Elias and his and his band of merry criminal attorneys now I don't mean like criminal defense attorneys but criminals who happen to have law licenses. They went around suing states saying your laws are racist and then the secretary of state being in bed you know not literally but perhaps with Mark Elias said oh well let me settle this with you with a consent. So there was some progress made in solving some of these problems and of course our elections are not it's not like there's some guy in a room somewhere who's hitting buttons and you know what I'm saying is that the law is not a legal law. So I'm saying that's not a legal law. So I'm saying that's not a legal law. So I'm saying that's not a legal law. So I'm saying that's not a legal law. No its just normal law is not a legal law. Because there are no such problems and your song you don't chasing annoying people on the streets. And all this in here. All this and I'm saying it is not an option. Let's think of something much more that. We can put these없ť tough on all the things we do. And so, you know, through the tremendous hurtyly at efforts of 2020 to make sure that there was no possibility to detect fraud they stole it. And then they say well there's no evidence of the fraud. And I said well yeah that was the whole entire point of you ceasing to check signature verifications. Kind of the idea. You made sure that the evidence would not be recorded that's called cheating. And so, you know, the elections can be measurements of what the population wants. That doesn't guarantee that the population's going to want anything positive. And I think that that's largely the point of people who, you know, complained that there's no political solution. It's not that the elections are rigged that they're complaining about because they're, they're other fantasy relies on them being responsible for the outcome of the election. The complaint that they're making is that the population doesn't want it. And so, you basically have to impose government by unpopular means. And that's fine. I'm actually not so opposed to that. I just don't think that that's a particularly realistic prospect. People tell me that, you know, it's not a realistic prospect to go and gain influence in the Republican Party. Well, I'm not talking about that I would personally wave a magic wand and everybody in the Republican Party would do what I said. I just say that if enough people in the Republican Party want something they tend to get it from the Republican Party. And the people who happen to be wielding the most influence in the Republican Party want things other than us, which is why we have to compete with them. And if we don't compete with them then we lose. It's actually pretty straightforward. And so, you know, nothing's ever going to be completely above board. You know, it's the United States government. People are going to lie cheating still to get it. It's very valuable. If you ever see what a crackhead will do for 20 bucks, you know, it's a surprise you to find out that more ambitious people will do more insane and dangerous things to control the government of the United States to license to steal and print money. Criminals will do a lot to get that. And so there's always going to be some level of corrupt influence. And if your society is, you know, not populated by, you know, virtuous, diligent, honest people, then, you know, the corrupt influence is when. So, you know, try to, you know, it's a multi-problem strategy essentially. Try to influence people in a, you know, virtuous, honest direction and be the people who participate most energetically in politics. And that's, I don't think there's actually any alternative to that. Do you hear what you said there are a Chris, you said a virtuous, honest erections, which you said. I guess I'm pretty sure I didn't, I'm pretty sure I said, I, well, you know, if I said virtuous, honest, erections, I'm sure there's a place for those. It's just not the, not the voting booth. You know, I've had many virtuous, honest, erections in my lifetime and I've put them to good use sometimes, sometimes they go to waste, but, you know, anyway. You know, so the point, of course, is that there's actually no substitute for having a country populated by decent people. Unfortunately, there's actually no alternative to that. And so, you know, the people who participate the most energetically in politics, if they are not the most honest and virtuous people in the country, then, you know, then the politics are going to be corrupt. And anybody who tells virtuous, honest people not to participate is, you know, basically making that a foregone conclusion. Well, yeah, the United States is going down the tubes. I mean, anyway, you look at it. I mean, I vote. I will vote. It doesn't cost any money to vote. I don't see why you wouldn't vote. Even though I'm not really sure my vote counts, I'm pretty sure the elections in my state are rigged. But I'll vote anyway just for the hell of it. But I think the best thing that would happen, in my opinion, is if Russia would just take over American annexes into the new, new and improved United States of Russia, and just throw everybody in Washington, DC, and Langley, Virginia, and all of that Eastern Virginia, throw them all in prison or put them on their own, in exile and some desert island somewhere. So that's what I would like to see happen if Russia would annex us, would be the United States of Russia. I'll let you go. Yeah, I'm going to punch out of that one. I don't want to, I don't want to be invoirvated by a foreign nuclear power. I would very much like to try to avoid that outcome, for sure. You know, I am not, I'm not even going to get into it. Not even not even going to do it. Sorry. I'm just going to, I'm just going to let that go. Glenn 19 cents one dollar on Odyssey. Why didn't Rob Rhondon flee to Iran when he was let out of prison? That would have been a safer place to hide from political persecution in Eastern Europe. Hopefully Rob learns his lesson this time. I think that's because Rob Rhondon is not particularly invested in securing the existence of Persian people and a future for Persian children. I think that's probably not probably not the case. Libertary Ops since $14.33 don't punch right. It's much easier and infinitely more satisfying to punch left. Yeah, there's a lot of truth to that. Yeah, that's probably true. Definitely satisfying to punch left. You know, I said on telegram the other day. I stumbled across a video of Donald Trump from like the 2016 campaign trail. You might recall this one. Let me unmute my telegram real quick so I can play it for you. You might recall this. Bryce is a little bit of audio. All right, if I could find it. Come on. There it is. We're going to win with every single facet. We're going to win so much you may even get tired of winning and you'll say, please, please, it's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much and I'll say no, it isn't. We have to keep winning. We have to win more. We're going to win more. Now that wasn't like an exact, you know, prediction of how the future turned out clearly. And that's unfortunate, I'd say. But the reason I posted that the reason I played it here, I said on telegram, I said, you know, Trump doesn't have to be on your side to be on your side. All he has to do is despise, repert a Kaplan and leticia James while wielding the powers of the presidency of the United States. That's a realistic potential. By this, he will do more to help you than you could conceivably hope to gain in the mold bug reset one fell swoop and collapse fantasies nurtured by acceleration is too cool for politics streamers, podcasters and telegram edge lords. Fuck winning, let's just start hurting the other side. And that was very amusing to me, but especially today because I came across a piece. I see here, I see, I don't have it pulled up or is it bookmarked from a prior thing. Oh, let's see, yeah. Oh, this is not that one, not that one. So it would be over here. Yeah. The piece in NBC news, fight or flight, fearful Trump critics, way the risk of retribution if he's reelected some are considering leaving the country of chopper turns to the White House or saving money to handle expected legal costs. And in this, Roberta Kaplan and leticia James are not mentioned specifically, but one imagines that they think about these things before they go to sleep at night, assuming they do that. And, you know, I'm not going to read the piece to you, but you can kind of just imagine how this goes, right? I mean, they mention specifically, um, Alexander Vinnman. The Stephanie Grisham, John Kerry, Mark Zade, Sarah Matthews, Michael Cohen, John Bolton, Bill Barr. What's her name? The one, uh, not Sarah Matt, is that? The former deputy press secretary, I don't think this is the one I'm thinking of who's the one that went in there and told that preposterous cockamami story. I haven't used the word cockamami in a long time. I should probably start doing that. Um, that cockamami story about Donald Trump trying to fight the secret service and steal the fucking bearcat or the, uh, what's the name of the car? You know, the secret service car, whatever they call that thing. Bearcat. It couldn't possibly be a bearcat. I've been in one of those. Which is like, yeah, Donald Trump fucking tried to fight the secret service to the Kung Fu master or whatever. I then she like wrote some preposterous book. I know. Like Donald Trump doesn't have to go and do all the things that you want Donald Trump to do. Donald Trump just has to go and be like, yeah, I want to go fuck over these people have been making my life a living hell. Yeah, I'd love it if Donald Trump got in there and, you know, nominated, you know, Carmichael Carney to the Supreme Court of the United States. Be like, here's a guy who understands the constitution. You go up there. You straighten this fucking shit out. Get rid of that John Roberts queer, you know. But if he's not going to do that, you know, you get to least go and like make Roberta Kaplan think about leaving to Israel. You know, that'll be great, right? People say there's no political solutions. What do you think a fucking solution is? What's a solution? You get everything you want in politics. You think I don't Hitler got everything you want in politics. I don't think he did as a matter of fact. Yeah. Everything happens because, you know, other people want it to some effect, right? Two on seven six eight eight one four three three like to be on the pogrom and a moment of less I have to so please do give us a call. Call or you're on the radical agenda, what your agenda? I'm sorry, I you were muted until just now if you could start over again, I'd appreciate it friend. No problem. Yeah, no, I said thanks for taking my call Chris Greek show so far. Thank you. I hate to be the Debbie Garner, but I'm sure you can anticipate I'm going to be. You know, you talk about Donald Trump hurting the other side and, you know, having revenge fantasies that he's going to come after these people at a harm team. He's never done that before. I mean, they made his life hell in 2016 too and he didn't hurt anybody and then now I, you know, do we really think he's going to hurt Roberta Kaplan? I don't know why we would believe that and, you know, when I think of the other side, you know, it's easy to attack somebody like Latisha James. You know, it's done. They grow that, you know, obviously ridiculous, but Donald Trump has never hurt the other side. I mean, for me, the other side is, you know, not just the left. I mean, it's it's Jewish power and he's done nothing but help the other side. So I don't know why we have this idea in our head that he's going to hurt the other side or he's going to, you know, take out revenge on the people that have attacked him. He's never done that. I don't know where the evidence is to believe that he would do it now. Well, I'll tell you the, there's, I'm not saying that there's proof that he'll do it. What I'm saying is that there's a cause to suspect that it'll be a different category of decision at this point because in part because, you know, and it's, this is not unique to Donald Trump, okay? Barack Obama did not go all in with transgenderism is the civil rights cause of our time when he was running to be president of the United States. He saved that for a second term you might recall, okay? And so, the president's understand that they're limited to terms and so they typically try to get more ambitious in their second term and they spend their first time trying to get elected to that second term. So you don't go run around throwing your political opponents in prison necessarily. Nobody else did that. Barack Obama was still sticking with, you know, marriages, a man and a woman, you know, and like all this stuff. And then he got in there and he's like, oh, let's go trans your kids. We're going to ban conversion therapy and, you know, and all the things that he did. You know, the only ambitious thing that Barack Obama really did in his first term, appropriately given the power that he wielded at the time was get the affordable care act through. But even didn't he didn't even pursue the cap and trade thing, right? He kind of was like, yeah, you know, we got our thing everybody come down at act normal, right? And, and, and through that and through such a big business. And so, Barack Obama is further right winged in Donald Trump's then if we want to compare president to you. Well, you know, I think that I'm not sure that, even the thing you brought up the affordable care after that was a Mitt Romney idea that Barack Obama cartoculted it and made, you know, like the law of the land. But that came out of, uh, the problem. Oh, come on. So, I mean, I know we could attack Mitt Romney, but even that, like the furthest left wing that thing that we could talk about with Barack Obama would have been, you know, something that a Mitt Romney said. Well, if you think Mitt Romney's got an original idea and his head, you're crazy, right? Mitt Romney's a tool of the Democratic Party. And so, like, you know, and, and, you know, the, the, the constant infringement in, you know, gaining ways into the healthcare system has been a left wing social calls for a very long time. And so, you know, you wouldn't say that, I don't know, you can come up with different examples, but I'm not in any position to be defending Mitt Romney in any case. And so, uh, I, I don't know, uh, you know, and, and I was not, and by the way, I was not, I campaigned against Mitt Romney for Ron Paul. So, you know, it's not even like, uh, you know, and, and in 2012, I see, did I even vote in that election? No, I didn't. I don't think I did. And so, uh, or did I vote, or do I write in Ron Paul? I don't think I voted in 2012. Anyway, uh, so, I don't know, you know, the fact that there's people in the Republican Party who do Democrat-like things is not something that comes as any surprise to your humble court respond at my friend. I mean, it's like, we talk about that stuff all the time. Uh, Barack Obama was a left-wing fanatic who played it cool for his first turn, safe for the Affordable Care Act. And then in his second term, he got real ambitious and lit the White House up and, you know, rainbow lights and celebrated gay marriage and set on to the transgenderism, right? That's what Barack Obama did. And so, like, if you're the president of the United States and you'd like to get really ambitious, you really want to make it into your second term. And if you have no experience in politics and you have, you know, the opposition party wants to kill you and throw you in prison. And the only thing that can keep that from happening is your party. Well, then you have to like sort of make nice with those people. And so, they're like, well, you know, he's like, okay, well, what do you guys want? And they're like, we want tax cuts. And he's like, okay, cool, it's got taxes. I'm not big of fan taxes. Let's go ahead and get your tax cuts through. So they go ahead, get the tax cuts through. And then they sit on their hands because we've been, it's not a surprise to anybody in this audience that, you know, a great large portion of the Republican party is actually not so much on our side. Their control opposition, their cowards, their being blackmailed, whatever the case may be. And so, like, that's the whole idea, you know, what we were just talking about, which is, you know, if there's not virtuous on as people participating in politics, that's what you get, right? And so, you know, get more virtuous on as people participating in politics and then try to chase those cocksuckers out so you can solve a problem. If that fucking takes 10 years, better 10 than 20. Yeah, I mean, you know, you talked about Mitt Romney not having an original idea, which I completely agree with, but I don't think Barack Obama had money either. And I don't think Joe Biden has one. And I don't really think Trump has one either. And that kind of, I guess, is the crux of the thing is like, I don't think that it's like waiting for the moment to be radical left or radical right or whatever. I think it's just this is how this works. This is how they kind of game that system. And, you know, why didn't Barack Obama, like Barack Obama's second term was much heavier enforcement on immigration than Donald Trump's term was, or any Republican up until that point. So, you know, I don't know. I guess I'm just being pessimistic. You know, I guess we'll see what happens. But, you know, I would hate to be right in this case. It's just, I don't think of the other team or the other side as being, you know, the T.C. James or, you know, the left wing or whatever. Yeah, I think it's, you know, the people that help Israel are just as much on the other side as the people that, you know, want to push transgenderism. And unfortunately, Donald Trump's track record is on the other side too. But I'll leave it at that. Well, you know, I'll just tell you. I mean, you know, part of the reason I actually, what part of what maybe think to post what I did was, was because of you. You shared with me the video of, I forget her name. I believe the wife of the VDR guy. Okay. And she was on with Tucker Carlson, right? And they bring up that Latisha James is going after VDR. Right. And so, like, I'm like, oh, that's right. Latisha James is not just going after Trump. Like the same people that are going after Trump are going after me. They're going after VDR. Right. They're going after everybody. And so, like, you know, if Donald Trump goes in there and is all, if Donald Trump becomes president of the United States, and all he does is go make life a living hell for Roberta Kaplan and Latisha James. And he accomplishes no other meaningful goal. Well, I just go so far to say that's better than Joe Biden being president for another four years. I mean, it's not, that's not a solution to our problem by any stretch of the imagination. But it's better than Joe Biden helping them. Right. It's better than Joe Biden nominating Roberta Kaplan to be a Supreme Court justice. Right. And so, you know, yeah, I won't disagree with that. Right. It would be at the very least, it'll be cathartic. Right. We could say that. I mean, the thing is it's like Latisha Jackson, one of the fucker name is like a diversity hire. She's brainless. And they'll just swap like you can literally swap anybody into that role. And, you know, but this is why this is why you love diversity, by the way, because it's like you can just get done black people that are whatever they're told to fill in these roles. And I mean, it's the same thing when they impeach my orcs. It's like, yeah, my orcs is horrible. And I would love him not to be the person. But there it doesn't really matter who the person is because it comes down from above. And I mean, they'll just if you know they can't touch my orcs, but if they could, if that was real, they'd swap them out with somebody just as bad. So, you know, I get, you know, I don't know, maybe I'm being blackpilled about it. It kind of gets to the point where it's like this is, this is just ridiculous. You know, so, but yeah, no, the teacher Jackson is going after V there. And those are good people. And, you know, if if on the small chance, the whole trial comes in and attacks her specifically, that would be better than not attacking her, I guess, because I do hate her. But I just, I guess like, I number one, I don't think he would do that. He's never shown his, you know, stomach to do anything like that ever before. So I don't think he would. But maybe he would, I don't know, but he definitely is not going to go after a bird of capital. That's for Dan Schwer. Well, you know, something tells me that we might get to have a conversation about this during the second Trump administration. I'll be interested to see where it goes, my friend. Absolutely. Thank you for taking my call, Chris. And I look forward to it. You know, if Trump is president in the next election, I would love to call in and have a conversation about that. Thank you very much, my friend. Appreciate the call to 1768 81433 like to be on the program. I'm going to tell you the list I have to. So please do give us a call. Caller, you're on the radical agenda with church and a. Hey, Chris, I called in a few weeks ago to talk about COVID and I want to want to talk about that again, but I'm going to change the topic to a different topic. I wanted to talk about you had said that Kathy Rice and Witts became a prostitute. And so how did how did the old chatty Kathy go down that career choice? You know, she, she has, I don't think she should go to jail for it, but I don't think it's a wise career decision either. Well, friend, I'll tell you, you know, she had gotten into, I don't think that she had done that. That wasn't just something that she did after whoever was paying her pulled the rug out from her activism. And the way I found out that she was actually prostituting on her blog, she told the story of the first time she ate a man's ass. And this had happened. I forget the year off the top of my head, but she told it in some gory detail that she had been prostituting herself for years. And she thought that this was great, right? She just thought it was a really great idea to sell her pussy or whatever and, you know, and to eat people's but holes for money. And so, you know, do I think that she should go to prison for that? Well, I'd rather send her to prison for right to blog telling other people to do it, frankly. I mean, you know, she wants to do it herself. It's one thing, but I do believe that she's harming others when she goes out and she says, this is great young lady. Let me entice you into prostitution that, you know, that I could that I could definitely I could I could tolerate knowing that there were people in prison for that. But, you know, we don't want women to be prostitutes is not in their best interest. And so, you know, how do we prevent that from happening? And I'm willing to entertain any diversity of ways of going about that. But of, you know, throwing people in prison gets it done. And that's perfectly fine with me. Well, yeah, I think, you know, she's kind of messed up her own life. And, you know, she's probably going to have a hard time finding a decent man that wants to marry her and have kids and stay with her long term. And statistics show that the more sexual partners a woman has, the higher the odds are that the marriage will end in divorce. So, you know, she's probably not going to have the best future. And, you know, I'm not saying she's like some ideal woman, but I'm sure there's some lonely guy listening to this show right now. And, you know, if they could have hooked up with Cassie Rice and Whits, you know, years ago, before she got into this, they probably would have done it. Yeah, I mean, you know, there's a piece of it. One of the things that I published as member content is that Christopher Kiddwell.net, you know, shows like this before and after photo where like she, you know, where she's like a young, you know, reasonably attractive woman on a stage next to Julie Barowski and she's smiling and happy compared to what she looks like now. It's not, it's really, it's an upsetting comparison, you know. And so... So I mean, who has age some too? Yeah, of course. I mean, that has some role to do with it, of course, but, you know, I think that one who views the comparison understands that it is the unmerciful effects of time combined with the unmerciful effects of her lifestyle have rendered her this way. And so, like, you know, my point, my point just fundamentally being that I think what you're saying is accurate that there was a time in her life when she was a desirable woman and that time has now expired. And it's not in my view disconnected from her behavior. And I think that you understand that as well. But, you know, I guess to your point, I'm not sure why don't you go ahead and tell me exactly what you want me to say. Well, I actually, you just brought up what I was going to bring up next and that was Julie Barowski. And I haven't heard anything about Julie Barowski the while, but I happened to stumble upon a video on YouTube not too long ago of Julie Barowski debating Kathy Reisenwitz on John Stossel's show. And they were debating whether or not libertarians should engage in identity politics. And, you know, Kathy was debating the pro identity politics side. And Julie Barowski was debating the anti identity politics side. And anyway, it's rather telling now, but last I heard about Julie Barowski, she got buried and I believe she has a couple of kids now. So, yeah, I mean, I would say I don't think that I would say that Kathy was likely representing an identity politics side and not V identity politics side. There is not one identity politics side and she has taken a rather dark, literally and figuratively identity politics side, which is not conducive to certainly not to libertarian ideas and not at all to, you know, the peace and harmony of mankind more broadly. Julie Barowski took what has become the standard issue, oh, they're doing this and we should do something quite contrary to that position saying, well, identity politics is not what we want to do. And that's actually not a response to what Kathy was doing. The response to what Kathy was doing is, okay, fine, identity politics it is and you lose, right? And that's actually in my view a superior argument and a superior strategy. Okay, did you hear about what happened to Lauren Southern? I've heard, I mean, I'm not sure what you're referring to. I know that she had like gotten, last I heard from Lauren Southern, she posted some video that she was like had a problem with the husband and he was complaining about a ADHD or something and that's all I really know. Yeah, yeah, so she had got married to some guy in Australia. Apparently, I think the guy was half white and half Asian. I didn't know that I wanted. Yeah, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep. And I think he was like possibly half white Australian, you know, probably of English Scottish ancestry or something and part Chinese. And anyway, apparently the guy was a fat like an Australian version of, you know, some federal agency like FBI or something. I don't know what they call it in Australia, but I guess she met the guy when she was on one of her trips around the world and the guy must have rooter. They got married, he knocked her up, they had a kid and then she was living in Australia and I guess the COVID lockdowns came and Australia got pretty tyrannical on COVID as did Canada and the situation in those countries was worse than it was in the US as far as the crackdowns and everything. And apparently Lauren and her husband relationship wasn't going too well. And anyway, I guess her, she had a family member that died or something and she went back to Canada and then he came to Canada and then he was going to live with her in Canada but apparently couldn't get his good of paying job as he had in Australia. So he left and abandoned them. So she became a single mom and she apparently had to move into some kind of sort of like a campground or something and she was living in like a shack in a campground for months. And anyway, now she's gotten a job with some other media outlet online media outlet, I guess she probably moved out of the campground a while ago. And anyway, now she's a single mom with a, I guess a partially Asian kid. And I think that's unfortunate. I like Lauren. I thought she did great material and I met her one time at an event years ago. I got to speak for very briefly and she seemed very nice. She was very attractive and certainly would be desired by a lot of guys. So I think that's really important. So what do you think of Lauren? Apparently she got divorced. Her, her and this guy got her got a divorce or were in a process of getting a divorce and he wasn't paying any child support or anything. But so what do you think of dating single moms? Because a lot of people say it's a bad idea and I would tend to agree with that. Well, that idea. You know, look, I have, shall we say new on's views on this and they probably wouldn't all well be all well received by the audience. There's a reasonable desire to find, you know, shall we say women who are not, I don't want to say tainted, but, you know, you know, a woman who doesn't have a child is more desirable than one that does say. I think that's a reasonable statement that most men can agree with and I think that most single mothers can understand that given their dating options. And so, you know, but at the same time, I mean, it's, it's a value calculation, buddy. I mean, if you know, take a look at any number of people who are just complaining about the unavailability of desirable women. And, you know, if they lower their standards sufficiently, then there will be desirable women available for them and they're, you know, they're not doing that. And so, like, you know, it's, it's a value calculation at the end of the day. You know, if a woman is, if a woman is a single mother because she was running around promiscuously having careless sex with people and, and, you know, has a half black child by one of her many sex partners. You know, that says something very serious about her character and it probably tells you that you're not going to have a very happy marriage with her. But, you know, it's, you know, I've known really great women who were, as you say, you know, married to a guy and, you know, for whatever reason, whether it was because he did something wrong or some, you know, catastrophe happened that they find themselves without, you know, a father for their child. And then they, you know, they get back on the dating market and they try to find somebody and she might be a suitable wife for the right guy. And I don't hope, you know, in a, in a, in a movement that has, that so quickly calls a guy a cuck that could be, you know, you could be kind of averse to that if you're sucked into alt-right politics. But I would say that, you know, if you find a quality woman whose biggest flaw is that she has a child by another man, it's, you know, it's not a thing that you should take lightly. But it's not, it's not the craziest thing in the world to marry that girl, you know. Well, what would you say as a guy whose, I guess you would be self-identified as being, I guess, I don't know, for lack of a better description, part of a white nationalist movement who has a partially Asian child? You know, I'm not that, I'm not that hung up on this stuff. I know a lot of the people in the audience are in like whatever, you know, they, they know me about, I've talked about this before, I try not to bring it up because I end up with audience revolts on my hands, but, you know, I've always said like if you're a love of somebody or a love of somebody that's actually not, I don't think that's a thing that you choose. It's part of the reason that we want, it's part of the reason that we want an ethnically homogenous place because if you put boys and girls in a room together, they're going to have sex. It's not, you don't take a fucking genius to figure this out. It's the whole entire point of having a homogenous society. And so like, you know, if two people have a, you know, if two people come into contact with one another and they fall in love and they have a family together, especially if this happens before that person becomes aware of, you know, you know, before they become racially aware, I don't think there's any reason to hold that against the person. And so, you know, if you're like a white nationalist and you're like, oh, I'm going to go, I don't know, go start chasing broads in Harlem. Like, okay, well now you're demonstrating hypocrisy and what the fuck is wrong with you, right? But like, you know, if you, you know, I got, there's a number of different scenarios they can imagine within the confines that you've described. I mean, there's been a lot of guys who have been involved in, you know, peripherally on the alt-right who never fully got into it because they have like an agency. Because they have like an Asian girlfriend or something. They're like, oh, well, I can't, I can't be in your movement because I have an Asian girlfriend. And I just think that's a dumb fucking thing for the movement to do, right? Like, you know, like politics is about addition and multiplication. And if you're fucking dividing and subtracting, you're going to fucking lose dumbass. So like, figure it the fuck out. If there's like a white guy who believes with your ideas and, you know, he's interested in their pursuit and basically the biggest problem that you have with him is that prior to meeting you, he fucking fell in love with some hot Asian check. Like, get the fuck over yourself. It's kind of like my attitude about it, honestly. Well, you know, I don't know if Warren Sutheran ever called herself a white guy. Well, it's a white guy. No Warren Sutheran does not aspire to be known as a white nationalist. You know, I mean, you know, so like, you know, whether, if, you know, if some guy who's like, you know, if you're just some, if you're somebody who listens to the radical agenda and you end up in a room with Lauren Sutheran and you hit it off with her and the big thing that you've got to deal with in order to have that, you know, hot blonde white girl be your wife is that she's got a child. That's what a court or whatever like, you know, okay, like it is. Is Lauren Sutheran going to provide you with two white children? Well, you know, replacement level, you know, that child's going to be there either way. So like, you know, somebody's going to tell me that Lauren Sutheran's Jewish, I'm guessing. And I, you know, it's not it fundamentally defeats the point. And so like, but at the end of the day, it's like, you know, I want people to be fucking happy. The whole entire point of what I do is that, you know, the people who I find valuable can live fulfilling lives. And I'm actually like, the reason I'm interested in the racial component of things is because I was convinced quite against my will that the racial component was pertinent to that goal. It's not that I, that I'm obsessed with the racial component of it and from this derived by desire to live decently. It's the exact opposite. And so like, you know, if people can live decently, while there are in the presence of other people, like that's actually the most likely outcome. Right. So like, if we were to, if we were to gain a whole bunch of political power, the idea that we would completely ethnically cleanse the United States is a preposterous idea. Our women, the women in our movement, once they started to see that, would think us monsters for doing this. And they would not tolerate it. And to keep our women happy, we'd have to fucking moderate our behavior. And so like, you know, there's going to be some percentage of people around us who are not ethnically homogenous. The question is, are they a political problem? And as long as we can maintain a situation where they're not a political problem, I don't see any reason to try to cause those people any unhappiness. You know, you take New Hampshire. I think New Hampshire is still upwards of 90%. Why? If New Hampshire were to succeed from the United States, it would be a white nationalist country. Okay. You would not actually have to deport anybody who's here now. We have like this, you know, the city of Manchester is a fucking disaster because they dropped all these like, Somali and refugees here. And, you know, the federal government's been dropping niggers here when they got out of prison and stuff. But like, even at that, like, yeah, find the city of Manchester will probably still be a fucking cesspool. If you don't change anything about the city of Manchester's demographics, it would probably get worse over time. But those people cannot then go and influence the state government, right? They're never a political force that they can actually, they can never wield the influence that the federal government does with its increasing diversity, right? So like, if 6% of your population is non-white, just give them all the rights and privileges of citizenship, treat them with respect and have them be a minority with all the rights and privileges of a citizen. Like, that's fine. The problem is, when the government opens up the borders and subsidizes importation of third world countries and just completely tries to change the demographics through force and coercion and deception. And so, like, you know, don't do that and treat your minority population decently. I think that that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Yeah, well, I think Lauren put up some really excellent videos over the years and documentaries like Borderless and farmlands. As far as I saw people online, you know, claiming that Lauren's son is Jewish. I don't believe that to be true. I'll just, you know, kind of really weak evidence. There was a video she put out a while ago where she did like a DNA test and she was reading off the results. And, you know, unless she was lying, which I don't think she was, that was not in her results. So she did come out as less Danish than she thought she was, but I think she was like, had some English or Irish ancestry or something and parts of Spanish or something like that. But anyway, she, and then some people said, you know, a real last name is Simon's and, okay, well, that doesn't really prove anything either because that's not necessarily a Jewish language. And so, you know, she's supposed to be a Christian or raised a Christian. And so, you know, I don't know if she has the Jewish ancestors for your nod, but, you know, it's possible. I guess she could have some ancestry, but I think effectively speaking, she's nod and she's put out a lot of good material over the years. And, you know, I think it would, unfortunately, what happened to her. I mean, this guy that she married sound like he was a real jerk. And I'm kind of surprised somebody as smart as she is would fall for something, you know, fall for a guy like that. I mean, a guy, I mean, what do you think of a guy who just abandoned his kid and doesn't even pay any child support? Well, it's too obvious to warrant stating that I think very lowly of a man who abandons his child. And so, you know, and it's not my understanding that Lauren did anything to warrant that, right? If she was running around cheating on him, then I'd perfectly understand that he's like, get the fuck out of my life, horror. And, you know, what he decides to do about the child, I would not want to be in that man's position to have to contemplate it. But now that we're into the obvious territory, my friend, I'm going to move on to other callers, but I thank you very much for the call. And I'll look forward to doing it again soon. 2-1-7-688-1433, you like to be on the program and I'm where you talk less I have to. So please do give us a call caller. Before I get to you, let me just go read something off here. I am Winston. He sends $100 on Odyssey. I disagree, Chris. I would love to see every yenta on the planet be given prostitution as her only employment option. But not because I'm a Nazi or anything, nothing like that salute. You know, do you want, I'm just going to let it go. Call her, you're on the radical agenda, what's your agenda? Lauren's daughter, God. This is having. Hey, having, we're not funny. Lauren's daughter is a cold burner. She's a cold burner. But yes, she is. I thought it was better not to be with bang some fucking half Asian guy. That's a later hook up. Third picture is of her with her Negro friend. I mean, I'm glad that she called attention to suffering in South Africa or whatever it was she did, but I'd rather have it from a woman who doesn't have words and so forth, whatever she's got. You know, she's just polluted. I wanted to talk about Trump. Okay. First of all, first of all, okay, you were talking about running for office and the people think, oh, it's hopeless running for office because they expect too much. All right. There are two different kinds of activities in politics. One is educating the public and trying to change the general public perception of things. And in that, you can be as radical as you want. Although the more radical you get, the smaller your following will be. All right. But running for office is not the same thing as educating the public. When you're running for office, what you have to do pretty much is figure out what your constituency is and say what they find agreeable. And avoid things that will divide your constituency. Yes. You know, like Adolf Hitler avoided publicly expressing his views on religion. It's hope for us just to get religion completely out of politics. So yeah, you're right that Adolf Hitler did have to compromise on some things. But Adolf Hitler, we cannot really expect any time soon to be able to make the kinds of relatively rapid changes that Adolf Hitler made in Germany because our situation here is different Germany only 14 years before 1933 when Hitler became chancellor only 14 years earlier. And they had just come out of the first world war and underwent domestic communist revolutions and establishment of a Bavarian Soviet socialist republic and all kinds of crazy stuff was going on in Germany because of this crazy stuff that was going on in recent history in Germany, which never completely stopped because there was still violence and some words with parties having their paramilitaries and all this. When Adolf Hitler became chancellor and then communist burned the whole in fall or in palace and also burned the Reichstag, there was receptivity to the idea of just shutting these people down and not having to put up with them anymore, right? Yeah, public was ready for it. You know, Hindenburg was ready to issue the decree. Hindenburg, of field marshal and the army would support it, which was extremely important. So there was all kinds of receptivity to these kinds of radical measures because of the recent history in Germany. In the USA, we may be moving to a more and more chaotic situation, but in general, you can't expect things to move that fast. You have to look at incrementalism. And I think that in terms of incrementalism, Trump actually has helped. He was a big disappointment. He didn't deport a whole bunch of people as he made people believe he would. I'm not sure exactly the details why he didn't get around to that, but you know, some people make excuses for him that he was undermined in this regard. But I think he did a whole lot for us in terms of shifting public opinion. He kind of mixed those two things together. He said things that everybody wanted politicians to say. So try rewatching, sometimes, the 2016 Republican debate from South Carolina. But there are clips of that on there, especially the exchange with Jeb Bush, where they talked about the invasion of Iraq. And Trump said that it was a blunder and a lightest into it. And he was getting glued ferociously by this audience. But he didn't back down it. And it's, he did not back down one bit. It was glorious and it was exemplary. You know, this was like real courage that he showed on that occasion. And it's that a great example. And actually a lot of people on the left like Trump for that, you know, for his anti-war position. You have a lot of people in the Democratic Party like Jimmy Doerr, like Trump better than Biden, because of the issue of foreign wars. Right. I think that I think you make an important point to like Trump generally, one of the things that I think is lost on entirely too many people in our circles is that he absolutely changed the way that people think about politics. I say this all the time. Sorry for repeating myself, folks. But like he he absolutely did that. And and his he probably did more on the campaign trail than he did in the White House. Right. I mean, the way he campaigned completely reorganized our politics. He ran like a candidate who really wasn't even trying to get elected. Yeah, he's like, boomer. Yeah, I never thought that movie, but he was just saying things that are pretty much common sense that no politician will say. Yeah. And it worked. But also on the question of immigration. Well, let me. He also created an expectation. All right. In that regard. Even though he didn't follow through and and culture hates him forever because of that. He still made people very aware of it and created public expectations that something must be done about this. And also provoked reaction. The hostilities between the political establishment and the majority of public opinion are out in the open now. Whereas they would not have been out in the open before, you know, if we had a president, Jeff Bush, everybody would have been still half asleep. Yeah. They brought all of those hostilities out into the open. And part of that was the massive de platforming before the midterm elections in 2018. And took Alex Jones off of a bunch of different platforms. Not that I value Alex Jones very much, but a lot of people off of different platforms. And they did this rather started this rather blatant censorship and also interfering with the election in 2020. And that's why Elon Musk now owns what was called Twitter. I mean, I don't think that would have happened if not ultimately for Trump. That Trump provoked this tyrannical reaction, which in turn provoked even more Trumpism effectively. And Tucker Carlson then broke with Fox. And now he's on that same alternative. We've got more and stronger alternative media now after they tried to shut down what was on YouTube and so forth. That we had before I would say maybe you could argue about that. But I think that Trump actually accomplished a lot more for us than you would know from the fact that he's not a president. Now what he did in office and the main the main worry that I would have about Trump at this point is maybe a lot of people are supporting him who don't really expect him to do very much again. Maybe maybe a lot of people are just supporting him because he's not Biden. I mean, that would be the worst thing is this people it was such a good thing that he got people to expect something in 2016 and and awaken that because for example, governor avid what he's doing down in Texas and all the governors that supported him on it. But that wouldn't be happening if not for Trump in 2016. Yeah, that all goes back to Trump. You know, you know, we got the country splitting apart because Trump came out and said the things that weren't supposed to be said. You know, and and I hope I hope this time that people also have expectations. I think you have made some very good points here, my friend. I am it's he he rearranged the way that people think about these things and he and he did so in part. You know, as you say by you know causing the the the laugh to you know and even the you know he exposed here's another point that I think is lost on a lot of people. It caused so many people in the country to actually understand the bad elements of the Republican party right that there is a lot of people, you know, as I it's interesting to me, especially as I'm going through as I mentioned at the beginning of the show today. My old email correspondence from you know 2009 2010 trying to put this book together and one of the things that stands out to me about a difference between now and that period of time was the unquestionable. Oh, well, he's a Republican. He's a good guy thing that like we were so fed up with with so many of the tea party groups, right? And yeah, Trump completely blew that out of the damn water, right? He's like the Republican is not necessarily the good guy. He might well be better than the Democrat, but that doesn't mean that we want him, you know, it does not that doesn't mean we're fooled into thinking that he's on our side. And so like that was something that you know we were painfully aware of in the year 2009 and our and our associates and the other tea party groups they had no awareness of that at all. And we wanted so badly for them to you know sort of comprehend this and we had no idea how to bring that state of affairs about and then Donald Trump comes in there and it's just like like, yeah, Jeff Bush is a low energy loser and just makes fun of them and sure enough the entire you know frame of reference of all these people is completely turned upside down as a consequence. Yeah, yeah, all right buddy. I appreciate the call. Thank you very much. It was a great call hadding. Oh, they usually are, but that was an extraordinarily good hadding call. Like that's like one of the best hadding calls I think that we've had and it's not just because you agree with me. It's because you made my point very much stronger in fact. And so let me see him. It's 1125 and I might normally give up by this point, but I started 20 minutes late. So maybe I'll play a little clip real quick and we'll come right back. And I'll talk to you for a few minutes. If you guys want to get on the phones, you're welcome to do that. Let me see here which one of these do I want to play. I've been sort of like while hadding was carrying the show for me. I sort of went through a bunch of old stuff and tried to figure out what I'd play. I'm going to play after the United States will play that clip and we'll be right back. Kiss your bumpstice goodbye ladies and gentlemen and do not hold your breath for the board of war. You've been fucked over by a politician shocking. I know if you need a moment to process that feel free to pause recording if you're not alive. Listen to of course you want to want to pause the live show that it's suck. Where's the net you've gotten the exact opposite of what you paid for from a guy who runs around with signs at his rallies which read promises made promises kept. Oh, and he's got a bunch of Jewish in laws great and half Jew babies. Mug indeed. Let me fill you in on something I figured out when I was still libertarian. It helps me during times like this and perhaps it can help you too. The one can surely be less harmful than another the president is not going to help you. Not this one not the next one and surely not the one after her. You're going to get screwed every single time it's just a question of how hard this time they'll blame the Congress and next time they'll blame the courts. The time after that they'll blame the next president as each two four and six year term expires another excuse will follow and eventually you'll be dead. It's not a bug. It's a feature democracy is a scam. Always was and always will be. It's a shame so many of us are just now figuring this out. They sterilized our wives and daughters turned them into prostitutes and tax cattle and went on birth rates predictably plummeted. They replaced us with foreigners who is stupid enough to keep falling for this nonsense. You have been targeted for extermination and as far as the exterminators are concerned the job is already done. They're just waiting for the less you to die off as they figure you inevitably will. Is Trump a well intention guy being bullied by more powerful forces is he a misguided former liberal who still hasn't figured out the meaning of the word infringed. Is he yucking it up with the so called deep state at your expense. I honestly do not know and I am not going to put a great deal of effort into finding out I did the conspiracy theory rabbit hole thing a long time ago and to answer your question it has no bottom. During the prior episode of radical agenda the final caller said he saw no political solution to our imminent demise and all you could think about was siege. A book by James Mason which essentially advocates helping to accelerate the collapse of civilization in a hope state you and I might play a role in rebuilding it. Attempting thought indeed huh. Though I did my best to talk the guy down I could just as easily have taken the other side of that argument right been there a time to actually. I mean I suppose we could pull it off if we try right. I could pack up my guns and a few essentials broadcast war propaganda from a secret location until all you to get yourselves killed fighting the most powerful government in history of mankind as each man was killed a caption I could write some kind of tribute and read it on the air hoping to inspire more men to throw their bodies on the pile. If you're listening to this you are the resistance it would make fantastic fucking radio I guarantee it at much boys. But I'm rather fond of sex and steak and a whole host of other things which would most likely become scarce in such circumstances. I've also put my mother through a<|ml|><|en|> shit about that so call me a coward but I must resist the temptation here. We've got other options we could all get for sector means and enjoy the fucking decline we could sling met and bang diverse tinder thoughts until a dicks fall off what the fuck are we worried about the future for when we have no obligation to participate this does not have to be our problem gentlemen. We've got every goddamn distraction imaginable and a few beyond our imaginations I'd imagine whiskey is cheap porn is free and abundant women have less self esteem than the men they're cooking perhaps we've been foolish for getting so worked up about all these shit in the first place. But that ego you know I've managed to convince myself that I was a great and powerful man a few times as I made the futile effort to clear my coke drip but it always wore off in the morning leaving me to feel really pathetic and poor I might add. I'll tell you another time I felt great and powerful when I got back to my hotel room after the torch march brawl and shallots will. That felt good man these red motherfuckers swung on us and we put him the fuck down fast I saw that picture of me spraying that guy and I was like this is fucking awesome and I made it my Facebook cover photo. Next day I was not feeling quite so powerful though I found out there was a war now for my arrest for crime I did not commit in my reaction earn me an unflattering nickname you might have heard. Then I watched unfold before me a paradigm shattering series of events which made my conspiracy theorist days look tame by comparison I get how you crash planes into buildings rigged with explosives put a missile into the Pentagon and blame it on cavemen with box cutters as it excuses to start a war with a country that not even you claim had anything to do with it that made perfect sense. But how do you convince the whole world of a complete and total lie while hundreds of videos openly viewable by the public and nobody who matters ever seems to notice how do you show 12 registered voters those videos it convinced them to put a scared kid in prison for life plus four centuries and change. I'll tell you how fella it's power kiddo they got it you don't they win you lose and waiting on powerful people to wield their power more responsibly is no more going on. You want to rescue your race in nation and getting wasted a blow in yourself up you have to have it you need to wield it not Donald Trump not Rand Paul and most certainly not the Democrat party you deal is almost we'll political financial and social power like that which we witnessed our rivals wield against us in Charlottesville. But Chris you say that's impossible never be able to do that okay well fine do drugs blow yourself up go to prison and hope for a sissy sellmate I don't know what to tell you. These people have been at it for a century and you just figured it out like 15 minutes ago we got a lot of work to do and maybe we fail who knows not I friend. But I'll tell you this if Trump is some kind of Jewish scam it was a miscalculation on their part and you notice so called people have a nasty habit of overestimating their own intelligence so this is a distinct possibility ain't it. We advance by the errors of our rivals and let me tell you boy they don't fucked up this time. Say what you will about Trump but you most likely would not be listening to radical agenda safe for him and if that means we got a burial bump stocks in the woods and so be it fell. I don't give a shit if Trump comes out of closet is transgender before the end of the show today if tonight talk a Carlson says Donald Trump wants you to call him daughter from now on and Rachel man out has a change of heart about the God Emperor will be right is rain fillers. Because anybody who thought they were going to form a white ethno state from a country that's already 40% non white was kid themselves from the get go. I don't get me wrong it matters who the president is it matters which party controls the Congress I'm going to keep on talking about those things because the federal government could destroy us in an afternoon if the wrong people got the upper hand and we cannot allow that to happen. If after the next mass shooting Donald Trump decides a or 15's a too dangerous for us to own that I'll just have to disobey the guy as I vote for him in 2020 because you know the next Democrat will come for the pistols to. Our participation in federal elections is not a strategy for taking the country back but rather a stall tactic while we work out other contingencies. Now as you know I do not like the anti-Americanism that runs through some segments of this movement but you've also heard me say a million times that the United States cannot stay as a contiguous system of government. Diversity is not our strength it tore this country apart a long time ago and that is a very very sad thing which is why we are not going to let it happen to whatever comes next are we fellas. Our task then is to be active participants in deciding what comes after the United States. Good day was that a good clip and that I'll tell you that is from no later than September of 2019 is that's the file date on the clip that I just played for you and I'm certain that it was actually recorded prior to that I don't have the original recording data for top of my head. But that's the file date when I made that clip probably wasn't too long after that I mean do I have the. I was actually recorded in 2018 as a matter of fact and so that was included in the best of the radical agenda volume to. So I'll just leave that hanging I'm not even going to get into it you heard what I had to say in 2018 and we're still here. I got this story pulled up here it's you know who's you know who's a really dangerous radical is that Jack Pasobic guy. I got a piece here media I we didn't get there all the way on Jen six trump booster pledges to end democracy in CPAC grant is banning cheers on. Altrite conspiracy theorist Jack Pasobic was vowed to finish what writers began on January six by working to overthrow democracy completely. Pasobic made the comments during the opening day of CPAC to conservative political action conference in Washington DC on Wednesday. Welcome to the end of democracy. We see Pasobic declare we're here to overthrow it completely we didn't get all the way there on January six but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here he said holding his fist in the air that's right because all glory is not to government all glory to God. Steve Ben and former White House advisors heard in the background exclaiming all right amen. The reaction on ex formerly Twitter to Pasobic audacious statements with swift Republicans against Trump posted. Choms are public in party openly wants to end democracy we must stop them. And then they're going to read a bunch of tweets from these fucking retards. Pasobic expanded on his plans and interview to real America's voice quote we are here in the swamp to drain the swamp and eventually to raise the swamp to the ground and create the new American Republican Republican. Ashes Pacific said Matt Boyle said yeah but look do you think all that deep state people who live around Washington DC the DMV right DC barrel in Virginia they don't notice all these conservatives around of course they do they see you guys. Oh they're terrified they're terrified terrified with us Pacific emphasize. They're scared of you guys of the people that come to this conference because they know it's the people that come to this conference that give a shot to guys like Trump to come back to the White House and actually take their power away right Boyle said. Pasobic answered the people in that town that you know and I know so well they want this to not exist they want all of you to not exist you said while pointing to the CPAC attendees they want your borders to not exist and they want to get rid of you. And that's why I say we do not we do need to be here I should say we do need to plant a flag. Former president Donald Trump is expected to speak Saturday on the final day of CPAC 2024 media outlets deemed left wing or left wing by organizer match slap have been banned from receiving press credentials at the event watch the above clips on Twitter. So that's fun I mean you know you're getting to a point where jack Pasobic is getting on a stage and being like oh well we didn't manage to overthrow democracy on January 6th but we're not done yet. And do I really get the impression that jack Pasobic is trying to you know carry out the January 6th mission of overthrowing democracy I don't know if that's quite a literal interpretation of the state of affairs but the fact that the fact that we can even. Have a chuckle about it I'd say is rather different than things were in 2015 for fucking sure. Everything's so much different now man you know. When was the last time you saw shit change this much in a few years you know. I don't know I've been paying attention to stuff a long time you know I got I you know I watched politics from the day the towers came down until the day I got a legal problem in New York that turned me into a lunatic and I need notice no change at all really I mean you know Barack Obama became president and you know. Yeah they changed the health care system but whatever. And then you know towards the end of the Obama administration like everybody was real pissed the fuck off and we got Donald Trump. And Donald Trump didn't make these radical structural changes to the form of government turning like that but. The attitudes of the general public have been radically altered and those are manifesting in our politics and that's a good thing in a lot of ways I don't know that it's all good. But it's better than it was in fucking 2000 goddamn eight for sure better than it was in 2016 for that matter. And so like you know I think that most of the people still listen to show probably of a similar mindset that you know we could be in a lot worse position than we are guys you know like I think that there's a lot to look forward to about the future and I think that you know black pill and over just kind of fucking dumb if a modest with you and by the way just doesn't serve any purpose right. If you're like depressed and fucking you know desolate not you know motivated to do things that's a self-fulfilling prophecy if there ever was one and so. You know try to be motivated to make things better and that is not always an easy thing to do that's a task in and of itself but it's one worth pursuing for fucking sure. And so I would encourage you to do it I do that you know it's not always easy. I think it's fucking tough to do here try to do it in prison motherfucker. Well but you can do it if you try and try and is trying is what separates you you know from all those other fucking losers out there if you if you try you're going to notice that trying is like a very powerful thing it like it really it puts you on a completely different class of animal. You know 90% of civilization you know all of these people are running around like the thing that they're trying to do the most is create a situation where they don't have to try you know. And so try I think that if you do that you'll you'll notice spectacular results Tony soprato he sends a hundred bucks thank you Tony what's happening to Rondo is just another sign that things are falling apart here same with New York City going after Trump we live in a banana reporter. I know I talk about leaving the U.S. a lot but I don't want to be the guy thinking damn I should have got out earlier Trump is probably our last shot. Well yeah you know trippie told you know I answered this guy earlier we're talking about you know politics and I'm like well you know I don't hear people making you know alternative suggestions. Trippie told like that's your alternative suggestion matter fact it's expatriation there's actually not you know there's actually not an alternative to participating in politics except going to a place where you prefer the politics matter fact. And that's not an unreasonable thing to consider you know what was somebody asked the question earlier. Like why didn't why didn't Rondo go to a run or something instead of we I mentioned this you know it's the I responded that by saying he's not trying to secure the existence of Persian people in a future for future Persian children right but. You know. Whatever the case may be I mean expatriation may be the best alternative and it it would be a prudent measure for those of you with the capacity to you know start thinking about what that looks like. Figure out how fast you can do it and what kind of you notice you would require in order to get that accomplished but I. You know and I believe me when I tell you I think about that I'm just I'm on probation under supervision the United States government so not going to talk about a whole lot of my thoughts on it but. It's not a idea that hasn't crossed my mind for fucking sure. But I'll tell you what man I've I've been in fights and I've run from fights and I felt better about fights I stayed in lost and fights I ran away from. Truth be told you know I don't like the idea you know I really don't like I don't feel good about myself after I run away from a fight yeah. I I've well got fucking beat the fucking shit with like my blood still clock in my nose and like. It felt pretty good about that you know. It's a different fucking story if you know they kill your old family so I mean you know you know expatriation sometimes becomes prudent but. You're a shot you know Tony soprano tops us off the evening with 1788 and he says I understand we've seen some momentum in our favor but until that momentum translates to political power our main family pessimistic on the plus side there are still tons of great white people outside our borders we can survive without the US if. He'd be well that's sure that's yeah it's definitely true you know. No look and you know. I should shut the fuck up I'm just going to shut up this things I could say that I'm just going to shut the fuck up okay so I really appreciate everybody who listen to the show even if even if you don't pay me. I appreciate you all the more if you do so if you haven't done so why don't you go ahead do that. Christopher can't well that net slash donate will give you all that information pretty straightforwardly I like that crypto currency make good use of it I got the cash app edgy Chris is the cash tag there. Age the the gift and go gives and go to com slash spm you can do the the gifts and go thing and I got strike payments strike dot me slash cat well if you don't have strike payments even you're not going to send me any money maybe just go get strike payments go ahead do that. I don't know that a lot of people are using strike payments but you know expect a new wave of financial de platforming in the future maybe even if you're not going to send me any money right now you want to do something prudent for the future. Just go and like get other you know get it find as many ways as you can to engage in financial transactions and maybe sign up for because it costs you nothing to have a strike payments account. So I don't go ahead get that you don't have to send me any money but you'll have it and you'll have the option of using it in the future you can look into it I've got a referral code somewhere but I don't even care just go sign up for the fucking thing and what else. You know I mentioned on the member show I'm not going to get too much into it I kind of just went off on the cuff off the cuff I'm going to start doing. So I got a little bit of a medical problem honestly so I was I could probably see this one right here like I've got these like I've been breaking out and fucking hides okay. And I've been trying to figure out what the fuck is causing this to happen and. You know you go what causes hives and it's every fucking thing it causes hives from 90% of the shit that I eat to stress to any number of things and so one of those problems is that you see I'm addicted to the stupid fucking energy drinks you see I've got different ones here today because I found out that the the Celsius drinks that I have they have like this like over abundance of B vitamins and actually get something called niacin flush which doesn't cause hives generally speaking but it can cause you to have like. And I think it's a lot of fucking problems. The way I do the show the model logs are the most labor intensive portion of this if I could just sit down and talk to you about whatever. The show would be pretty easy to do it's when I wake up in the morning and I start trying to conduct I start trying to compose a model log and I take those things pretty fucking seriously I try to knock them out of the park every time and that's not easy to do. I failed to do it from time to time you might have noticed. But I'm going to try to do a couple of things that will free me from that burden one of them you saw recently I did like this OME TV thing where I can go and just go jump on this thing and chat with people we might do some shows where like I just like I'm just going to say like okay it's an OME TV night right and if I can anything I can do where I just sit down here and be me like that's obviously pretty easy for me to do it's. If it's if I have to spend all day trying to write something good that that's a labor intensive and it's also very stressful and it causes me to like drink a million of these fucking energy drinks and trying to like jog my mind to make this happen and I caused myself a lot of fucking anxiety in the process sometimes not complaining about it. But I'm just explaining to you like what it is that I the problem that I need to solve here. And so we might be doing some things like that if you've got suggestions for like things that I can basically you know I know that you some of you guys say you love when I just like read the news. I've always felt like that was cheating but maybe I'll just do news and phones episodes or something and then once I've dealt with that and I can sort of like focus back on that I might do like maybe I'll do like the live OME TV things will be like a radical agenda member show or something. I haven't figured this all out but in any case you know and the other thing and I want to do fundamentally so I wanted to vote more of like the creative energies to the book thing I think that you know the show is good and I appreciate it. You guys listening to it and stuff and especially those of you pay for it but sadly you know not 10% of the audience pays for for the show and the number of people who like pay substantially for the show is very small number indeed and so like you know I need to I need to find other revenue sources fundamentally and I'm and I have some hope that the book thing can actually do it. And so I need to start you know devoting creative energies to things outside of the show and I'm trying to write a monologue three days a week for here like that's completely prohibitive of that possibility and so. I'm still bringing it out I'll come back to you with like some some ideas if you guys have feedback I'm really interested to hear it the number to leave you a voicemail. If you leave a voicemail it might get played on the air but I'll just let you know what it is in any case it's 202 599 738 6 202 599 738 6 is the number to leave a voicemail. You can send me an email Christopher Kentwell dot net slash contact and of course I told you that I would read this address again before we got off the show Robert Paul Rondo. The guy who I talked about in the opening monologue tonight. I haven't received you know confirmation that he's at the MDC Los Angeles but that's presumably where he is they're definitely going to take him back there so Robert Paul Rondo is the name that you want to mail to number 77104-112 that's his register number. And you have to put that on the envelope to send a letter MDC Los Angeles Metropolitan detention center PO box 531 500 Los Angeles California 90053 if you are not in a position to send me any money. Do that go get a stamp write a letter to Robert Rondo and be like hey man you know I heard all about you on the radical agenda I think you're great I think that what you're doing standing up to these guys is brave you know whatever your sentiment may be. But say something really flattering and good to Robert Rondo and let them know that you know that you appreciate the things that he's done for race and nation and that and that you heard some portion of that on radical agenda would be a real that would be a real boost to me I feel really good about that. And so with all of that out of the way ladies and gentlemen find members at agenda binary that means all of you. Thank you so much for tuning into the radical agenda have yourselves a wonderful weekend. I do look forward to seeing you Monday for surreal politics Wednesday for this real politics member show and right back here. A week from today for every Friday 9 30 PM us eastern cursing up a storm. On live uncensored mostly unscripted entertainment program known as the radical agenda. Good night that's it it's over then we organized the death squads for the people who wrecked America. You know what you call people you can't call to enemies and if we want to divide our society into arms camps of enmity all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing. A radical agenda of the event has turned into an opportunity to the left to push a racial and radical agenda implement in their radical agenda is the only thing they care about their bad actors. What they want to do here is ram their radical agenda down your throat. These are great Americans, these are people that want to see great things that they got to know they try and build a blanket. One of the radical agenda it's not a radical agenda it's called the second amendment.