Of course it's doing what it's supposed to do. What else would it do? Something else? No, obviously. So Now now we got that worked out. We'll go ahead now. We'll start the local recording and with the local recording started Why don't we go ahead? We'll say hello to a lovely woman by the name of Ann Coulter. That's it It's over then we organized the death squads for the people who wrecked America. You know what you call people? You can't call two enemies and if we want to divide our society into Arms, camps, and enmity all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing. A radical EGF Army event has turned into an opportunity to the left to push a racial and radical agenda. Implementing their radical agenda is the only thing they tell about their bad actors. What they want to do here is ram their radical agenda down your throat. This is great Americans. These are people that want to see great things that they got to. You know they try and build a blanket. One of a radical agenda. It's not a radical agenda. Let's go the second. All right. All right. Welcome to the radical agenda. It's a show about timeless ideas. It news today and whatever's on your mind. It's 217-688-1433. Yes, this agenda is quite radical and welcome to it. This 54th episode of the Sixth Stage in a program. Today is February 9, 2024 is the current year. It's Friday is usual and we are coming alive once again. From my undisclosed location where at least in gentlemen, you know if you listen on some of the platform at some other time you're like most of the audience that downloads a podcast whatever a case may be. You know I invite you to join us for these live shows. We have a lot of fun here. There's like a live chat on the Odyssey. Sometimes people are talking on the telegram. Whatever it may be. You can join in. You can give us a call. I'd love to hear from you. And I titled the episode today a competent leadership and I sent out an email earlier because I, you know this morning I watched the interview between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin. And I found myself envious of people in Russia who actually get to be proud of their president, right? Can you imagine what that would be like? I mean like some of us kind of had that in the Trump administration. I was kind of proud of President Trump but that was comparable to other American presidents, you know. Like I was proud of Trump because he told Democrats to shove it up their fucking ass, you know what I mean? And that was, you know, that's worth being proud of in America that today that you tell the bad guys to go fuck themselves is like pretty significant now, you know. But actually, you know, you think about that that's not very sophisticated. It's actually not the mark of a high intellectual that he's trying to go on telling people to go fuck themselves now. You know, as somebody who goes around telling people to go fuck themselves all the time. It doesn't mean that you're not, you know, a serious intellectual obviously, right? But that's not what defines you as a serious intellectual. And as a matter of fact, just, you know, statistically, high-minded people generally are not running around telling people to go fuck themselves. It's just, you know, the correlation isn't there. And correlation is not causation. Clearly, we know that because the Democrats tell us that all the time about everything. Haha. And they wouldn't lie to us. I'm kidding, obviously. But you don't see American presidents in any context going up and talking about a subject for 30 minutes straight, right? You don't see them going into detail on things. You don't see them picking things apart and giving you, you know, a thousand year, you know, America doesn't have a thousand years of history. And that's probably good for American presidents because I mean, you know, think about your favorite political figure and think about him talking about the American Civil War, right? Not that long ago in the grand scheme of things. What do they tell you about the American Civil War? What they tell you is, Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery and it's unambiguously good. And that's basically all they have to say about it, right? They actually don't have a single intellectual piece of input at all. They all, Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative. You'd be hard pressed to find a libertarian gives you an alternative viewpoint about this. Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery and saved the union. Ask them to go any deeper than that. And they'll be like, well, what do you mean? They wouldn't even understand the question, right? They wouldn't even be, they wouldn't even understand what you meant by. Please tell me more. They'd be thoroughly confused. They're like, that's it. That's all that happened. If they're really, really sophisticated in, you know, by American standards, they might be able to tell you that that war costed more American lives than any other war. And that will be the extent of their knowledge of the American Civil War, kind of an important point in our history, you know, because especially since we're about to have another one, you know, it might be worth brushing up on that one. They have not a clue. And if they did, if they did have a clue, they wouldn't tell you, right? Because they think that you're a moron. And they're justified in that because most of your neighbors are, right? And so American politics has been boiled down to talking points and slogans and catch phrases and, and, you know, sound bites. And that's about the best that you can hope for. So if you haven't seen this interview between Chuck or Carlson and Vladimir Putin, you have to watch it. It's two hours long. Skipping episode of surreal politics if you have to. It's that important. It's a really interesting watch. And it, and it presents this really, you know, staggering contrast, right? A special counsel investigation into Joe Biden's illegal handling of classified documents opted to prosecute the president for the crime scene obviously committed. In part because, quote, we have also considered that a trial. Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury as he did during our interview of him as a sympathetic, well-meeting, elderly man with a poor memory. Okay, fine. Joe Biden, he's an elderly man with a poor memory, and this is basically a state of mental incompetence. All right. Hardly a shock to anyone who's been paying attention to the news, whether or not that means you should get away with crimes on account of this is more questionable, but, you know, the statement holds plenty of water. He then goes, Biden comes out and does this press conference to say, yeah, I'm really glad that they're not charging me with the crimes that I committed because I didn't commit crimes. They told that, you know, they cleared me. Now, actually what they said was if they put you in front of a jury, you want to get convicted because you're senile and we're prosecuting you in Washington, DC. It's a bunch of Democrats and they're going to let you go because there are a bunch of crick crooks, right? You are part of the criminal party. They run the city. You're going to go free, right? So, you know, because we don't think that we'll get a conviction, we're not going to charge you with the crimes that you've committed, right? He then goes on to defend his memory against this allegation. Now, he had his lawyer's contact to special counsel. He'd be like, hey, look, you know, could you just go ahead and say he didn't do it because saying that you're not going to put him on trial because he can't remember his name, that's kind of like problematic for the upcoming election. Could you, could you maybe, you know, grease the skids here a little bit? And his special counsel's like, look, we're not going to put your client in prison. That's, that's basically the biggest favor that we could do you. It's not the, I don't have an exact quote here. But then Biden comes out and he does this press conference and he calls the president of each hip, the president of Mexico as he's informing the country that everybody who questions his memories are recharge, you see. And then so, you know, take that and then contrast that with this interview between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin, right? The media is predictably up at arms about this. We talked about this, we talked about this briefly on Wednesday. They're losing their collective minds calling Carlson a Putin puppet and saying that Carlson did not push back on Putin hard enough as if this were the job of journalists to antagonize people, you know. And you might get that impression watching Jim Acosta during the Trump administration, but it is actually not the reason that we have reporters. I don't know if you guys know this, but kind of the idea, we have a first to met, it's a, we just had this to, it's like, it's in the first, in the Bill of Rights constitutional amendment. You know, it's a old thing. But then, you know, the press is like the only, you know, private sector thing that's actually mentioned in the Constitution, right? It's not, you know, but the banks don't have a constitutional right to bail out. It's like they do that, you know, that's a whole different thing, has not to do it to Constitution. The press on the other hand is in the Constitution and you're like, well, you know, why is this industry in the Constitution? And, you know, kind of the idea behind it is, you're gonna have, you know, if you have elections every so often, it helps if the voters aren't formed, right? If the people know what's going on, I'm not saying it actually works out this way, but the theory behind it is, if the people understand what's going on, then, you know, when they go, and they vote, then they might, you know, they might elect somebody who, you know, can stand on his own two feet. You can like leave the basement or an election and stuff and, you know, he'll remember who's the president of which country and that sort of thing. That's, you know, it's the idea behind having an informed electorate in theory, the press is supposed to do that. That doesn't work out that way. I understand. I'm not, I'm not actually defending it. I'm just saying that that's the theory. The reason that reporters get the very special access that they do is so that they can inform the public and the public can then go and make wiser decisions when it comes time to elect public officials. Hasn't quite worked out that way, but we all have a fairly strong interest in seeing that happen. So there's not a lot of, you know, push to officially repeal the First Amendment. There's, you know, they wittle away, you know, they sue me, you know, this kind of thing. So, you know, but like when a politician is dodging questions, yeah, like if, you know, if Tucker Carlson goes to Vladimir Putin and he's like, so why did you invade Ukraine? He's like, because Adolf Hitler is running Ukraine. Then, you know, Tucker Carlson could be like, that Hitler guy is dead. Like, he's not, he hasn't been around for a long time, Mr. Putin, are you on drugs? You know, that type of thing would make perfect sense. We certainly hope that reporters push back on politicians who are not making honest disclosures, right? But, you know, if a guy's just talking and he's, you know, informing the public of things that you want the public to be informed of, no reason to get in the guys way, unless, you know, unless your MSNBC, right? And you don't want them to be informed. Then you step on their feet and try to distract them and ruin everything. Carlson himself released, began the video that he released with something of a disclaimer, stating that he had allowed Putin to go on about the history of Ukraine for some time. He notes that several times he had interrupted Putin, trying to ask, you know, what the current, what in the current moment justifies the conflict? But when watching the interview, it becomes clear that Carlson is doing this because he anticipates the criticism, right? Like, if you watch that, it's true that Carlson interrupts him. And he's like, well, what about now? Like, what about now? And then he just stops and continues to let Putin talk. Why? Because letting Putin talk is actually like the prudent thing to do. He's only interrupting Putin because he understands that he's going to receive this criticism. And Putin understands that few comprehend the history involved in this thing. I do. Because when Putin made that statement right before the trips across a border, like, I watched that thing on television, what they aired of it. And I understood that he had published an article where he went into this whole thing in great detail. And I actually had somebody send me that article. And then I discussed that article for many hours with Viktor Putin, who knows a little bit about Russian history. So I understand it, but most people don't, right? If you were watching CNN that day, you got, you know, half of Putin's statement. And then CNN cut in, it was like, he's full of garbage because this is serial politics. He's full of shit. Well, you know, CNN, they said something else, but you know, the same idea. There's no Nazis in Ukraine. Those are our friends, don't you know? Putin understands that Americans don't understand the history, right? He further understands that Tucker Carlson is among the few people who are capable of understanding it because Tucker Carlson actually studied Russian history and not not in relation to this conflict. I'm under the impression he did it like in college. And so Putin goes on with this fairly detailed history of how the land now called Ukraine came to be spanning more than a thousand years. I think it began in, you know, 800 and something. Can you imagine, you know, American politicians going back and discussing British history because it predates America? Can you imagine them going back and be like, well, you know, some will like quote Edmund Burke, right? They've got a, they've got a book of Edmund Burke quote somewhere. And they can, they'll be like, yeah, well, you know, when I was running for office, I, I memorized a bunch of Edmund Burke quotes because I wanted to sound sophisticated. That would be the closest thing that you would get. But Putin goes back to 800, I want to say 862. The year he begins if I remember correctly. The media lapdogs of the Democrat party should be grateful that Tucker was not more forceful. Putin, it would only have further demonstrated his prowess. Putin actually understands what is going on and can recite complex matters from memory, answering other questions during the interview. He demonstrated his capacity to think on his feet. One can discern this even with the burden of an interpreter. And one imagined said a native Russian speaker who also understands English would look at the two men speaking and understand all the more fully that these were two extraordinary minds meeting and and and Putin's mind more extraordinary than Carlson's clearly. An exchange like that could not happen in America today. As I said, our politics are so low that they've been reduced to slogans talking point sound bites. That's it. Donald Trump could not do what Vladimir Putin did in that interview. And I'm sincerely of the view that he has a better grasp of world affairs than any president recent memory. You compare that interview to President Biden denying his crimes and trying and vain to defend his mental competence. It is a staggering staggering contrast. And last I checked, I just saw a stat fly by me that you know the video had 144 million views. And that was on one platform. I was a screenshot I saw. I want to say YouTube, you know, probably has more on Twitter and more on Carlson site, you know, more on rumble. And everybody's obviously talking about it. Everyone who watches that interview, whether they like Putin or not, if they're an honest and sophisticated person has to acknowledge that Vladimir Putin is the adult in the room and the people who are hysterically screaming about World War III are children. And so I posted a telegram, I said, I'm jealous of the Russian people today. Could you imagine being proud of your president? It was last time, you know, like I said, I mean, they're proud moments of Trump, but not like that, you know, not where he sat for two hours and discussed a thousand years in history in 30 minutes. No, you don't have stuff like that with Donald Trump. And we cannot aspire to that, you know. You want Tom Woods to be president, you know, I wouldn't argue about that by the way, whatever, you know, I don't, do I agree with everything Tom Woods says? It probably, you know, I probably agree with Tom Woods about as often as Tom Woods agrees with me. Let's say that. Just probably a lot, you know, I'm just saying he's not going to be president, you know. Yeah. Um, and you know, one of the things that was pretty funny about this, I told you before, it's, this is not something that happened, you know, there's a guy on the internet, I'm not going to name him, you know, who he is, who acted like, oh, well, you know, I'm just taking up for Russia because, you know, I met this guy in prison. No, you know, I, I was pro-Russia before the FBI broke my door down and it's gotten, you know, and I've been proven justified in that stance, right? And one of the things that I thought was like the funniest thing that I saw while I was in prison was a CNN HBO documentary, you know, HBO documentaries, if you know anything about me, you know, that these things are not, you know, they're not source of information, they're comedies fundamentally. And I saw one titled Navalny. And the whole thing was this dumb joke, right? I mean, you know, dates are good, seriously, as hell, but I mean, it was a, it was comedic in its preposterousness. And I'll show you what I mean by this, okay? Now, for the podcast only audience, this is going to be a little bit annoying. And there's subtitles to this because they're speaking Russian, but I will read the subtitles to you as we go through it, okay? Check, check, check. Okay. You know that Christa called it Moscow 4. You know, what is Moscow 4? Yeah, what is that? Well, the email of the very top brass guy from intelligence was hacked several time. And his first password was Moscow 1, and they hacked him. So he second his password was Moscow 2, and they hacked him as well. And so at the third time, he had password Moscow 3. And just guess what was the his fourth password. So Moscow 4 is the explanation of the stupidity of the system. Okay. So if you believe that, then you know, you might want to vote for a vaccine ofality in the next election, but that's obviously complete bullshit, right? That the head of the Russian intelligence services, the FSB, is his password is Moscow 1, and then he gets hacked. And then to deal with his email being hacked, he makes it Moscow 2. He gets hacked again. Moscow 3 hacked again. Moscow 4. If you believe that, you know, then it makes perfect sense that Alexei Navalny is the opposition leader, and he's a real direct Vladimir Putin. You know, the Russian people, they're all about that Alexei Navalny guy, obviously, because he figured out that the password was Moscow 4. But it gets dumber than that. Dasha, do you take my phone and we'll be at the kitchen pretending you're a general Baghdad. So look at how number it is. Do you see? 47. Dasha. It's just not. It's just not. Unimportant podcast listeners, I'll get to the point. They're going to start making phone calls that they're recording. It's just not. Somebody's calling them. Super. Excellent. It's working. Tomorrow we will make this calls. Honestly, I don't think it will work because, well, F is big guys. They're supposed to be resistant to pranks. But Moscow 4. Let's go 4. Yes. And then we're ready to push the button and everything will be published exactly at 12. And also I will publish my TikTok. I record it today. And we'll have a kind of 15 minutes of shame with it. So you might recall the story of been following Russia at all. This guy claims he got poisoned overseas. And that's his excuse basically for, or he went overseas claiming that he got poisoned. I think is actually what happened. And he's about to go publish some things saying, yeah, I've got the goods, the Ruskys did it or whatever. And that's good. They're going to publish this thing tomorrow. But before they do, they're going to make some phone calls and see if they can drum up, you know, some more intelligence. Okay. See you tomorrow. And so they've got, you know, this is belling cat, right? You've heard of belling cat. They keep on, you know, they're basically, they're almost like, you know, they're basically away for the CIA to leak things onto the internet. It's kind of the idea. But they pretend to be like citizen, you know, private intelligence or something. They're rigging up their recording equipment. It's taking a long time to do because it's a very sophisticated operation. You know, they're not, you know, they don't just, you know, have the call recording app because they're very sophisticated people. So they're running wires all over the kitchen in order to rig up their phone recording system. Now I'm totally feel like I'm a, now, for you on listen again, obviously the people are watching the video. No, it's going on for him to go and record some phone calls. What they've now done is tape a microphone to his chest, you see? Because, you know, well, actually, I'm not sure what the reason for that is at all. That doesn't actually make any sense whatsoever that you would be making the guy wear a wire to make some phone calls in the apartment. I don't understand why you would do that. Oh, you did that because there's CNN and HBO there. I understand. On the cover agent with the wired up. Sorry? The larynx? No. And to clarify, like CNN and HBO, so what he has is he's got a wire, he's got a wire running up his inside shirt and then he's got an outside shirt over it. It's not like the wire that, it's not the lapel mic or whatever that, you know, CNN and HBO gave you. I've had a few of those placed on me. They don't wire them up that way. The thing is tape, the head of the microphone is taped to his chest with like masking tape. So he's doing this for the benefit of the cameras. Vladimir Panayev. Hello. Vladimir Sanchez. Hello. Vladimir Alexandrovich. Good morning. You didn't recognize me? You recognized me. Hello, hello. Hello. This is Navalny Alexey, you're calm. I wanted to know why you wanted to... It's election of alny calling and I was hoping you could tell me why you wanted to kill me. I have to kill. What kind of pretensines are you against? Oh, my God. Oh, my God. You ruined their day. Oh, it's not just the day I kissed. What, hang on a second. What are you, are you kidding me? Hello, Alexey, I'm Androche. Hang on a second. Why is the damn video stop? You have to be, you know, always something, right? It's definitely a possibility. Yes, we can try to plug. You're not gonna be able to do it. Everything is okay. God, that's not God. Fourth. Passport. Hello. This is Navalny Alexey, you're calm. I wanted to know why you wanted to kill me. What kind of pretensines are you against? Hang up. Oh, my God. You ruined their day. Oh, it's not just the day I kissed. Hello. Hello. Hello, Alexey, I'm Androche. Alexey, I'm Androche. Hello. My name is... Greetings, my name is Alexey Navalny. I'm Alexey, and I'm calling you to ask why you wanted to kill me. To know why you wanted to kill me. Alexey, I'm Sanch. We're gonna play some in a small chunk. We will play Sion and Skame. Excuse me. Excuse me. Hang up. Maybe try the prank way. Okay. So now he's called two of these guys. He said, I'm Alexey Navalny while you try to kill me. And now he's calling Mikhail Shvets, aka Stepanov, and he's gonna try it the prank way. And let's see how this works out. Hello. Hello, Mikhail Mikhailovich. Hello. Uh, you're calm. You're calm. Maxim Sergei. This is Maxim, Houston off. I'm the assistant of Nikolay Platonovich. I'm the assistant of Nikolay Petru event. By the way, the asked me did you have it? He's got it in low. Good evening. Every morning, excuse me for calling so early. It's rather urgent, of course. Our bosses are demanding a report. money that's about why things didn't work out in 얘기 Undemsk is around, probably only trat不了 the fact that we didn't ask in TomSkip. I'm sorry, but I don't understand. What's the question? I don't understand. Mikhail Mikhailovich, it's you? Is it you? No, it's not me. No, it's not me. Who? I don't understand. Who are you? I'm the assistant of Nikolay Petrušov. I'm the assistant of Nikolay Petrušov. Who is Nikolay Petrušov? Mikhail Mikhailovich, we're going to play some weird game. Mikhail Mikhailovich, are you going to play games with me? No, I'm not. I'm done with your game. I know who you are. Goodbye. All right, that's plausible. That was a freaking scared guy. You recognize him? No, he's so scared. I really think a scientist might talk to you. One percent chance. Okay, let's reach some scientists. Could you have some interesting? Hello. How can I stand? Can't stand. Hello. My name is Stinov. This is Maxim Yusanov. I was born in the year 18, and I'm the assistant of Nikolay Petrušov. I received your number from Vladimir Bogdanovich. I apologize for calling you. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I received your number from Vladimir Bogdanovich. I apologize for calling so early, but I urgently require 10 minutes of your time. I need 10 minutes of your time. I need 10 minutes of your time. Don't need it. I must get. A statement from each unit member. What happened? What went wrong? I was fooling around. Why did the Navalny operation fail? I will gladly help, but I'm home with coronavirus. I have a request. I will gladly help, but I'm home with coronavirus. I have a request. So I will call you. I will call you. And what about Maxikov? Have you considered calling him? I have a request. Of course, I will call him. This is a simple procedure. I have a simple procedure. I am calling Alexanderov, Maxikov, Tyakia, and Tia. I will ask each of them to explain to me two explanations. I need to explain why we have nothing to do with it. What went wrong? Why did it happen? And what should be done next time to succeed? I need to do something good. I just need to ask you to do something. I need to ask you to do something. What went wrong? Why did it happen? What went wrong? I have been wondering the same thing myself. I would rate the job well done. We did it just as planned, the way we rehearsed it many times. We did it just as planned, the way we rehearsed it many times. We did everything we could to do. We did everything we could to do to do to do to do it. But in our profession, as you know, there are lots of unknowns and nuances. We tried to take everything into account as much as we can. But when the flight made an emergency landing, the situation changed, not in our favor. I understand. I understand. The situation changed, not in our favor. If the flight was a bit longer, I think things would have gone the other way. If he was in the air longer, the medics on the ground acted right away. They injected him with an antidote to some substance. They injected him with an antidote to some substance. They injected him with an antidote to some substance. If they were in the air longer, things would have gone as planned. If you were in the air longer, things would have gone as planned. He is talking to the guy on the phone. He is like, guys, we got him. His buddies, he has his hand on his face. The girlfriend is like, oh, my god, we are totally winning. They considered it not true to the probability of... Why? So it seems that dose was under S.M.A.D.1. Our calculations were good. We even applied extra. Okay, tell me, please. Please tell me about the specific technique. How exactly was the substance administered? Well, this should be communicated. Well, this should be communicated via a secure channel. Unlike my confessing to the attempted murder, which we do that all the time on a regular phone in the FSB, that's totally normal with us spies. We confess to the crime. And then when you ask for the details, we're like, yeah, maybe you should get me on a secure line because we're spies and stuff. No, no, I'm... No, no, it's not necessary, says Navalny. I... You need to consider who I'm writing this report for. At this level, there is no need for secure channels. It's right. Don't you know spy that once you're involved in the most serious stuff, then you just stop using encryption. It's kind of the idea. I mean, I'm just a person who... This high-up, they don't want technical details. It's hard to figure out. Now, give me the technical details over an insecure line. And in general, you don't want to go into details. How can I explain the delivery to the police? How can I explain the delivery method? We're doing it. Just tell me in the simplest terms possible. I know some things and not others. Regardless, I have to ask you. I know that I don't know. I have to ask you. I have to ask you something. I'm asking you something. I have to ask you something. I have to ask you something. I have to ask you something. These are the questions I have to ask. I have to ask you something. I can't tell you that over this phone. I can't tell you that over this phone. First of all, what's going on? Anyway, what happened with his belongings? I have to ask you something. I have to ask you something. Last I saw them, they were in Ampsk. We left them there after we worked on them. I have no idea where they finally ended up. I can only say that when we arrived, they were given to us by the local guys. From the Ampsk police force. From the Ampsk police force. From the Ampsk police force. From the Ampsk police force. From the Ampsk police force. From the Ampsk police force. But he is afraid of the police. What did they call? The crossyu was fine. Everything was fine with them. Everything was clean. What are the rules of defense against the guys of the belonging? Which garment had the highest risk factor? The underpants, of course. The inner part where the crotch is. Because that's where we put it. It has nothing to do with us trying to make fodder for CNN and HBO that we used underpants in the crotch. Knowing that CNN and HBO are a bunch of filthy degenerates who are going to be like, oh yes, underwear crotch. We love to talk about crotches on the news. The crotch of the underwear. The crotch of the underwear. The crotch of the underwear. The crotch of the underwear. The cod pieces they call it by the seams. The cod pieces they call it by the seams. So, you know what? Who told you that the crotch of the underpants had to be processed? The information that it should be processed. L-reve, now I'm kidding, that's a joke. I just inserted that. That's not part of this. The gulf of the underwear. Maksakov? Yeah. Do you remember the color of the underpants? Blue. Yes, blue. Yes, blue. Yes, yes, the pants. There's a possibility of residue there so we cleaned them as well. You can see it there. You can see something. You can see it there. You can see it there. There are no traces left. How did the Germans detect it? How did the Germans detect it? The Germans detect it. How did the Germans detect it? The Germans detect it. They put it there obviously. I'm kidding, that's not part of the video. Maybe they have special methods of detection. Where is it? Where is it? Where is it? There was nothing on the body, probably it was in the blood. This body was also cleaned in our hospital. So, I have well a particular somewhat peculiar question. I have well a particular somewhat peculiar question. You traveled with Navalny several times, including to Kirov in 2017. So, what is your assessment of him as a person? He never makes any unnecessary moves, that's my opinion. Smooth operator that guy, real smart. You're going to start laying on the compliments now for the HBO cameras. I'm kidding. Oh, to my opinion, that's the best thing about me. Careful and meticulous at all times. Good looking, real firecracker in the sack. I hear his girlfriend screaming while he's f**king her. Perhaps he just said meticulous and careful. He didn't say all that shit about the sex stuff. Perhaps he had a hunt shark guys were following him. Maybe he was a little bit too much, but he didn't say anything. Maybe he was a little bit too much. Yeah, I'm listening. I'm writing. Do you want to add anything? What else do you consider important and important to your report? I think this is probably at all maybe too much. Yeah, maybe. Honestly, I'm shocked by the questions. I hope you understand one. We are all shocked. Imagine how shocked I am. Talk to you later then. Yeah, all the best. I'll talk to you right after they turn the cameras off so we can discuss this great scene we've just shot. How are we going to do this? This is for you, Moscow 4. Oh, f**king god. He's not a muscle. He's a chemist. He's still a whole story. Unbelievable. It's unbelievable. I think you'll be president, seriously. I think after this. We will definitely kill me. Poor good reaction. Let's offer him to defect. Let's arrange for him the whole thing. I think that's a humanitarian thing to do. We're very humanitarian people, you see. Once we found the guy who was trying to kill me, we were like, oh well, you know, because we're the do-gooders, we've got to try to protect him from that Vladimir Putin guy. He's totally going to whack the guy for right now. He'll kill him. Well, people have been begging me to call them since the morning. Can I tell them this already? Let's just decide. Oh, so their door speak was waiting for their call. Hey, after you get the scientist to confess, could you give us a buzz? I'm going to publish this conversation. I think we should wait for a... What is press conference in the very least? Sorry? What is press conference in the very least? It is on Thursday or when? Yes, on Saturday. It's all very interesting. Okay. And so, you know, this is the level of sophistication of the people who are trying to take down Vladimir Putin. And that's why he's winning the war. You see, that's the whole entire thing right there. It's staggering that, you know, when you watch this thing from beginning to end, it's just non-stop nonsense like that. But they're like, oh, we're just going to call up the scientist and tell him to give us all the details of the operation to kill me. And not even, you know, it's not even that... It's not even... That they planned it that way. You see, this was an accident, okay? That they were just calling them up to screw it to them. They're like, hey, it's Alexei Navalny. Why would you try to kill me? Ah, fuck off, bye. And then the girlfriend, because, you know, we've got to have the girlfriend has to come up with the winning idea, because this is CNN and HBO, you see. And so they're like, hey, I got an idea. I got an idea. Let's have the girlfriend suggest that you prank the scientist. And then when you call the scientist, the scientist will confess to the crime and give you all the details. And then you can call Durce Beagle and tell them all about it. And if that's the opposition in Russia, then, you know, great. And look at, you know, they're like, oh, we've got to get the guy out of there, because they'll just kill him tomorrow and throw him in a ditch, right? Because Vladimir Putin just runs around shooting people in the head and killing them, which is why I'm still alive with poison in my underwear, leaving the country while I'm on parole, you see. When I watch this video, I was like, how unsophisticated are our intelligence services? One of the other things I thought was pretty funny about the interview between Tucker and Putin was, at the end of it, it's like one of the last questions to Tucker Assum, he asked him about this eric or scovic, okay? So he's a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, goes over to Russia, and in the course of his journalism goes and starts acquiring classified information. He's not supposed to have, you see. And this is national security related stuff for Russia. And so Russia's like, yeah, hello, American. You know, you come from the country that's financing the war that we're fighting. You know, you're running around being like, yeah, I'm just a journalist, no big deal. I'm just collecting some classified information. And then the Russian government's like, yeah, we call that espionage, you're going to prison now. And so, you know, Tucker Assum about this like, hey, you know, as a sign of decency, maybe you could let eric or scovic go. And Putin is like, no, like the guy received classified information covertly, that's espionage. And you know, there's negotiations going on between the special services, but you know, he's going to prison for that. And if they want him, then they're going to have to trade something. We've done all the goodwill stuff. It doesn't work out for us, you see. The idea that, you know, there's no American spies in Russia's preposterous, right? Like Russia keeps on catching Americans and saying you've been spying. And America never admits that any of them are, right? So if America was like, yeah, Paul Wheelan's a spy, but eric or scovic is not. Then you're like, oh, well, maybe eric or scovic is not a spy, right? But Paul Wheelan is running around in Russia with a half dozen passports, okay? He's former military and he's receiving classified information. So Paul Wheelan is unambiguously a spy. And the Biden administration didn't want to get their spy back. They wanted to get the basketball player, which is why they traded her for Victor Boot and not Paul Wheelan, you see. The drug, the drug using the drug smuggling basketball, Espion. It's why you shouldn't work for the United States. They'll get you killed, you see. But Putin, you know, accused is scovic of working for the United States government. You see he's working for the special services. Now, you know, that's not CIA. I don't know what I actually don't know what he means by that special services. But the implication is there that it's an intelligence agency. And of course, like the United States has these journalists, the journalists are doing espionage back at home, right? They're like, oh, well, let's lie to the American public to cover up for the regime, to do it all of the time. It's kind of the whole entire point of the entire operation, you see. And so when they go to other countries, you would expect that the same thing would continue. That there's spies at home, there's spies abroad, and then they go and they acquire some classified information. And then they're like, oh, I'm a journalist, a journalist, you can't prosecute me because I'm a journalist. Now, I think that we should prosecute you because you're a journalist, actually. I think that that should probably be actually like an aggravating factor, right? If you commit a crime and you're like, no, we should definitely double your sentence for that. In the federal sentencing guidelines, when you look at a statute that says, you could spend up to 20 years in prison for this, you're never almost ever going to do that 20 years, right? So I was facing 20 years in prison on the top count of my indictment, and my sentencing guideline came out to 41 to 51 months. I got 41 months. But you can get like aggravating factors, right? So if there's a continuing criminal enterprise as one, armed career criminal is another one. Okay, armed career criminal has guys doing life. Okay. Armed career criminal, like multiple, I forget what it is, you know, adds 20 points to your offense level or something like that. You should, we should definitely, that should definitely be the case in sentencing when you're like, oh, I'm a journalist. Okay, well, because you're a journalist, we're going to double your sentence because you're trying to take advantage of the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. You're putting other journalists in danger by running around conducting espionage by, well, pretending to be a journalist. You're ruining the country under the auspices of journalism. You're discrediting the entire profession. So because you've committed a crime as a journalist, we're going to make your sentence. We're going to add 20 points to your offense level, which is going to put you away for the entire 20 year statutory maximum of your offense. That would make a lot more sense than what we currently do. 2176881433, you like to be on the program and I'm going to tell you the less I have to. So please do give us a call. And so as I said, the media, they are in absolute shambles over this. They just can't, they just can't get a hold on themselves. Let me pull this up here. 2176881433, you like to be on the program and I'm going to tell you the less I have to. So please do give us a call. So here's a piece in the sun. Big bad, Vlad, body language experts revealed dominant Putin's hidden messages in rambling interview with Fawning Tucker Carlson. Oh, it's a rambling interview as it. And Putin goes in there and he's like, listen, Tucker, don't make me make you my bitch. I will bend you over his chair. I don't know why this keeps happening that like whenever I, you know, whenever drugs or revolver link to something on MSN. It I get the front page instead of the article and I don't know why that happens. Let's see. Apparently that happens when I get it from Google too. What the heck is this? What the hell is going on here? I'm just going to I'm going to just pull up some headlines here. Instead of trying to pull up a bunch of dead links from the damn news sites. Tucker Carlson. Come on, come on. You're kidding me. I'll just get some of the some of the choice here bits here. So MSNBC is not working. Tucker Carlson promised an unedited Putin. The race ult was boring. Says, uh, Masha, guess in at the New Yorker. Well, you know what? It was boring for you because you're low intellect fool who can't keep up with a thousand year history in 30 minutes. Putin used Tucker to wipe the Kremlin's floor. Says rolling stone. Tucker Carlson, the fired Fox News store makes bid for relevance with Putin interviews. Says David Fulkenflick over at NHPR New Hampshire Public Radio. Talk show or serious conversation. Tucker Carlson's interview of Putin offered neither says Adam Kabat at the Guardian. I mean, they're all just attacking the thing and being like, oh, this is so bad, right? It was boring. It was dull. Don't watch it. It's rambling. It's yada yada yada. They're not offering serious commentary on it, right? They can't possibly endeavor to do that because, you know, that would, first of all, require them to understand the subject matter. And the people who cover our news are actually not that sophisticated, right? And so they're definitely not going to do that. What they're going to do is be like, don't watch it. Whatever you do, don't watch that because that would be very bad for us. And it would, you know, if you watched Vladimir Putin talk about a thousand years of Ukrainian history in 30 minutes, and then you watched Joe Biden, you would be like, oh, why? Wait a second. That guy looks like he could be president. And this guy, why is he alive? President Joe Biden fumbled and opportunities to show he isn't asleep at the wheel in his first address to the nation after Thursday's damning special council report, portraying the president as a senile old man. In a hastily arranged Thursday night address from the White House, Biden confused yet another world leader referring to Egyptian president Abdel Fatal Alsissi as the president of Mexico. Quote, I think that Biden said before long pause before continuing. As you know, initially the president of Mexico, Sissi did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in. I talked to him. I convinced him to open the gate. Biden's untimely gaff made when the president shuffled back to the podium after initially ending the press conference is the latest in a recent string of mixing up world leaders. This year, President Biden described the recent conversations with foreign leaders who died many years ago, one as far back as 1996. This address was his first opportunity to showcase his mental capacity and to do the job of president of the United States of America after special council Robert hers report released earlier on Thursday referred to the president as a well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory. Purin his team interviewed the president for several hours last fall their report delayed shocking examples of Biden's significantly limited memory. The report says Biden did not remember even within several years when his son bow died. He also failed to remember his time as vice president, quote, in his interview with our office, he did not remember when he was vice president forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended. Quote, if it was 2013, when did I stop being vice president? And forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began in 2009, am I still vice president? Quote, in his interview with our office, he did not remember when when he was vice president forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended, I just read that part. Before the latest setback for Biden, Americans already doubted his mental capacities. According to an NBC poll conducted before Thursday's shocking special prosecutor reports 76% of voters have either major or moderate concerns about Biden having the necessary mental and physical health to be president for a second term, with 62% of voters in the polls saying they have major concerns about his mental and physical health. Yeah, well, you know, that's well founded, of course. 217-688-1433, you like to be on the program and I'm more or less, I have to. So please do give us a call. Caller, you're on a radical agenda with your agenda. Hey, Chris, it's been a long time, but I was thinking about the dementia of Biden, the FBI saying he's not fit to take trial. And now that effectively means the president doesn't matter who's president. And it's rather instead these like unelected and government managers in the background. So make the election see Momas a few times, but I was wondering your opinion on if RFK runs with Yang, who would that impact more Biden or Trump? I think it will impact Biden more. I don't think that anybody who's going to vote for Trump is not looking for an opportunity to squander their vote. There might be the least chained people of the world, they'll vote for Biden. And give them an opportunity to say I didn't vote for the Democrat and they'll vote for some third party candidate, but that's no skin off Donald Trump's nose because those people aren't going to vote for him anyway. So I don't think it's not my, I don't get the impression that Donald Trump has anything to lose from a third party candidate at all. Do you ever are you familiar with Z man? Z man? Yeah, he writes on tacky mag in a few other places, but if you're not familiar, he accidentally drop your name. He meant to say someone else, but he kept saying Christopher can't. Well, Christopher can't, well, we're referring to some book, but he meant some other Christopher something or other, but he was talking about the past, I don't know since Nixon pretty much how there's the difference in vote between Democrat Republican as always been like 54 or 24. Maybe at most 49% and so there's just like a small little percentage of people that actually influence the election because everyone else is either voting for their party or what have you. So I don't know the answer to see how a third party actually runs, especially now with so much animus on on both towards both candidates. Yeah, I would say that it doesn't seem to me that Donald Trump has anything to lose from it. Every election is basically, you know, the people who are informed about politics have an opinion about which party should be in power, right? And the people who are best informed view the opposite party as dangerous, right? And so like, you know, they're not going to generally speaking vote for the worst thing that they're going to do to their party is not show up. They're not going to go vote for the other guy with the exception of certain Republicans, right? The Democrats are going to vote Democrat 100% of the time, which is why Democrats always are seeking voter turnout. They don't care about anything about merit, you know, whether or not people are eligible to vote. The more people voting the better because, you know, when they're when their side show ups shows up there, they are greater number they win, right? And so Republicans generally speaking are not going to vote for the Democrat. They're, you know, except in certain areas, you know, as a total in the country, there are more Democrats than Republicans, but, you know, there's a very small number of people who basically aren't that informed about politics and then they show up on election day. And they're like, who do I feel better about this afternoon? Yeah. You know, even like you tell you look at election coverage and you see people on the eve of election day or even in, you know, primary votes are coming out. You know, primary votes are caucuses that they go ask people the night before like, you know, do you have the, you know, Fox News did like town hall things or, you know, audience interactions with in whatever capacity like the day before the Iowa caucuses. And people are like, yeah, I honestly don't know who I'm going to support tomorrow at my own party's caucus. Like you haven't figured this out yet. You know, there's, you know, there's these people who basically they're like on the, on election day when I walk in there, I'll make up my mind when I've run out of time. And that's where the wisdom on their visa gift cards. Yeah, there you go. You know, they're waiting to be, they're waiting to be paid for it. I guess, you know, and this is what it boils down to. And so yeah, I mean, you basically have a small number of people, you know, the people who are swaying the election for you are not the high-minded intellectuals. They're the people who actually know the least. And that's not a good thing for our country. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, hopefully it's Trump or fucking anyone else, then got invited. And so I just read a headline earlier that main, the state of Maine 90% white is building rent free apartments from migrants paid by state, or state taxpayers. Yeah, because the refutee resettlement thing over there in Lewiston went so well that they think that maybe what we need is more of that. You know, it's going so great over here now that we've completely, you know, put our white population in danger and the simoleons are killing our population and raping them. We're figuring that once we add some Mexicans to the bit, it's going to be, oh, man, it's going to be so good. I think we're out of Mexicans to drain from South American Mexico. It's all simoleons in China now. So there you go. We're just bringing all the worst of the third world and it's just fucking miserable. I'm down in Texas and I'm just waiting on that, but to, you know, figure to please speaking. Yeah, I mean, you know, I, I, it's starting to look like that might happen. I mean, you know, I'm now told that, you know, he might prevail in the Supreme Court, but I mean, it started look like that for a little while over there. Right. You know, I was starting to think like, okay, any minute now we're going to hear about, you know, somebody miscalculated, right. And that's the excuse for it, whether it's a miscalculation or not. Somebody miscalculated and a shot was fired now. Somebody's dead. And now there's going to be a whole lot more shooting and a whole lot fewer accidents involved. And I think you commented on it. Yeah, sorry. Go ahead, go ahead, buddy. Yeah, I think you commented on it. I think a few weeks ago how no one wants to be the first to fire. So it's all about going to the other person into making the wrong move. Yeah. And I mean, you know, the Biden administration seemed to have worked pretty hard at that. And, you know, to their credit to his credit and to Abbots, you know, they managed not to do that. Thank God. But, you know, one wonders how long they can keep that up. And so, yeah, and you mentioned before you've been like, I think it was you maybe commented on this, but basically if you're not willing to like sacrifice everything, this is why you're like, you can sort of keep kind of failing at this. If you're not willing to like sacrifice your family for something, then you're going to just keep losing it. The other side is willing to sacrifice for family and whatnot. So I know it would be like probably not ideal if I should just hit the fan all of a sudden, but it might be the only way through this because, like I said, like, we're at a point where the fucking president is not mentally fit to stand trial. So it doesn't matter who's in charge and the only way through that. Even do you can comment on this right after or maybe during the Tucker interview. The next revolution will be a conservative revolution. And we'll see how correct during correct do you guys, but I forget that guy that used to call you and do interviews with you and you and jail. But he did a whole piece on Duke and that was pretty enlightening a couple years ago. Yeah, I, you know, I don't know how enlightening his doogan stuff was. I know it was plastered all over my website and look pretty obnoxious when I got a prison, you know, I read doogan's book. I read doogan's book when I was in prison. I don't think that he's the puppet master behind the alt right. I don't think that he's secretly steering world events. I certainly don't think he's Putin's brain is the stupid liberal media likes to say, you know, the guy's got a pretty powerful critique of liberalism and and modernity more broadly. And I think that, you know, to that extent, you know, the fourth political theory was an interesting read. One who reads the book comes away with the idea that, you know, like doogan doesn't actually have or at least he does not articulate in the fourth political theory like anything approaching a new political theory that's actually not what he's doing. I'm not, I'm not entirely certain what he's aiming to accomplish, but nobody who reads that book comes away and is like, you know what I want to do. I want to be a dooganist. There's nobody, nobody believes that. Nobody, there's no, you know, that's not like an intellectual position that one takes. But they're like, I've done all the research and you know what I think I'm a dooganist now. Nobody does that. But, you know, the guy has some commentary on what's going on. He's probably better informed about what's going on in Russia than Jared Howe's. And so, you know, so that, you know, that as far as echoes, you know, you might learn something listening to Alexander Dugan. But, you know, when I came home from prison, it's like my website is plastered in this doogan nonsense. Like, do you use, to use tell you this doogan nonsense was down in Virginia. I'm like, what the fuck are you talking about? Like, there's like nothing to do with what's going on. Like these guys are my co-defense. Shot the fuck up, you know. And then I come home and it's like all over the place. And then I'm like, all right, you know, I don't want, I'm taking the only shit off the website. You know, I'm not going to syndicate your show anymore. And he's like, cat walls of dooganist. I'm like, okay, I'm fucking, you know, go fuck yourself. You stupid fuck. You know, and so like, you know, the guy did a lot of good. And I'm not, you know, all the good that he did is still there. And I, you know, I mean, it's not on my website, but it still exists. You know, he has done those things that he doesn't lose credit for all the good things he did. You know, it's like the thing like I get out of prison and I'm like, you know, this is not going to work. I did all this stuff for you. Yeah, you did. And then you, and then, and then you became a fucking retard. And so we're going to, we're going to not do that anymore. And so thank you very much for what you have done. But I'm not going to cheer on the Zog War against Russia because I don't want to do that, you know. And, and then I began, and then I'm in the two. Just overnight. Now, I think by inviting you guys, it gave some context to the Russian worldview in the 21st century, at least some Russian. And so I thought that was really interesting in that. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks a lot, buddy. Take care. Two on seven, six, eight, eight, one, four, three, three. Like to be on the program and when you're told to less than half to use the police to give us a call. Caller, you're on the radical agenda. What's your agenda? Wait a second. Now, why does it say that you're in the queue? I'm trying to bring you on to the show. I want to talk to you, not leave you in the queue. Hang on a second guy. There you go. Caller, you're on the radical agenda. What's your agenda? All right, Chris. This is Sean from Montana. This is my second time calling here. And I believe in listening to you maybe twice a month over the past year. Welcome back to the radical agenda. Dude, I gotta say a man. I'm from New England. I move to Ad New England. Fucking everyone who is in a white, rich American, should move to the bulk out there. Dude, you're the man, dude. I'm telling you. But I've got to call on you because this is a good conversation about Russia and Putin. I mean, all you have to say is Putin is so fucking intelligent, man. The geopolitical situation there in Eastern Europe and Russia is so much more advanced than over here. We have no comprehension of the five E-Chess that they are playing, that they have had to deal with over the past thousand years. So Chris, I just gotta say, man, I like your show, dude. You got balls, dude. I only listen to shows about twice a month, but I just want to get your opinion because I want to move for Trump. But I need to be convinced because Trump is kind of with the COVID thing, everything that went on. I don't know what to think anymore, man. I'm a 32 year old, the white man from Montana. I moved that to Ad New England. Dude, Putin is founded so he was talking about the soul of his people. He was talking about his history of his people. I'm convinced, man. What should the fuck I think, dude? I'm sorry. What you should think about Trump is, Trump is a lot less likely to wage war against the statesmen that you're currently admiring. My position has never been that Donald Trump is a great intellectual and moral leader. Trump is not emanating ethical goodness upon the nation. It's not that Trump made no mistakes or that his policies are infallible. It's that Donald Trump's job in 2016 was to keep Hillary Clinton out of the fucking White House. And people act like that's not an accomplishment on the alt-right. They're like, oh well, I'm still unhappy and therefore Trump sucks. And I'm like, well, no, as a matter of fact, Chris, I gotta tell you, man, I was living in Quincy and I was working in Boston. I was working for a tech company. When Trump got elected, it was like Boston was a drain of energy. And I was amazed. I had no... So you're totally right. There is a lot of energy there. All I gotta say is, okay, in case you ask this question, what is your astrology sign, if you don't mind me asking? I know that sounds kind of gay, but what is your astrology sign? I'm a Scorpio. Like, well, like, yeah, I fucking knew it dude. You're a Scorpio. When I saw that you had a back problems on your channel, I'm going through the same thing, dude. I really... I'm gonna connect you on your email. I really appreciate what you're doing because you're connecting with people in their 20s and 30s who like Trump, who want to vote for Trump because they think that's the best thing for America, but they're questioning it. I think there's a lot of people in this age bracket and I'm gonna promote your show. I really appreciate it. That's all I gotta say, dude, I'm kinda drunk. I just went skiing all day and I had a few beers. I just appreciate what you're doing man. Take care of your back. You know, retain your semen because Scorpio for me man. What we know is if you retain the semen, it's Scorpio's a tough man. Scorpio's a bull with a curse, but we gotta break that curse. I'm gonna reach out to you over email. I think we could be friends because I'm originally from the Boston area, so that's all I gotta say man. I gotta tell you. I gotta tell you're pushing Trump. Give me an email. You've commented on my semen. The likelihood of us hanging out is drop a drop on that 40%. You're like, hold on to that semen. I'm gonna send you an email. I don't know, buddy. You can send me an email for sure. I especially for Scorpios out there because the back problems will come up. I'm telling you, but I got three sisters from New England and I think you're a good guy with balls. So all I gotta say is man, I like listening to your show. I like how we're going for Trump. I think we have no for Trump. What Putin said last night was amazing to me. What he said about Bush was like I kinda have ADD, but I kinda maintained through his conversation. He said about Bush. He had a good rapport with Bush, even though he didn't agree with it. Damn, that just tells me and Putin on another level. He had a good rapport with Bush, but he didn't really like him. I think that similar with Trump. I think we're in a better situation with Trump. So that's all I gotta say. I'm sorry. Well, you know, if you want to have your sisters call me about the semen thing, do that. And we'll I'm sorry. I shouldn't talk about that. That's inappropriate, but I appreciate it, buddy. I'll look forward to your email. Have a good night. Thank you very much for the call. I love you, man. Love you too, buddy. Yeah. Yeah. What's your sign? Save your semen. I love you. Okay. Great. So two, one, seven, six, eight, one, four, three, three. If you'd like to talk about my semen or anything else that is on the table for this evening. And I would love to hear from you about anything other than my been my semen. We can have that conversation. Did something happen on Odyssey? Okay. I just rebooted my refresh the page on Odyssey. Tony soprano since $80 sending you the approximate amount of money required for a blow job from three Thai girls at the Miami strip club in Fouquet is the name of the city. I was in Ph. UK ET. And so I guess I'm gonna have to go to Thailand and get myself three blow jobs over there because because this guy just hit on me and told me to hold on to my semen. I'm two on seven six eight, one, four, three, three, like to be on the program. Let's see here. Let's see here. What else? Somebody asked me over on I should just ban the guy because he's a douchebag, but I'll read his comment. Pans are foused over on goyumtvass. Are you comfortable with being advertised next to gypsy crusader after he was exposed for being a pedophile and trying to fly out young girls? Well, you know what actually I have no fucking idea what the fuck gypsy crusaders doing. I don't pay any fucking attention that shit. And so if I'm on a platform and he's on a platform, I would love to be on fucking YouTube and you have better believe that I don't agree with queer kids stuff. They're on YouTube. You think I you think I should a quit YouTube because YouTube has queer kids stuff on it. Do you think that I should a quit YouTube because you know the Democrat party advertises there? No. So don't be a faggot. Okay. I hate this faggot stuff that people do. I don't know why they feel compelled to do faggot things. But for some reason, you know, they have this compulsion and I don't I don't fully understand it. You know. Two on seven six eight eight, one, four, three, three, you like to be on the program. And so let's see what else we got here pull up someone news. Tucker Carlson was not put on a kill list in Ukraine for Putin interview. Fact check Putin's interview with Tucker Carlson allegedly included a threat of war with the US. Here are the facts. Putin in rambling interview barely lets Tucker Carlson get a word in Putin calls on us to negotiate on Ukraine and Tucker interview. Tucker Carlson an obedient puppy in Putin interviews as Russian historian Donald Trump Jr. terrified by Tucker Carlson's Putin interview. Oh, here this ear. Let's do this one. That's great. Slate has done us the the public service of writing an article titled everything that was wrong with Tucker Carlson's Putin interview. And let's see it's you know, it's not that long either. So they're modest. It is legitimate and principle for a journalist to interview a murderous dictator. That's why we love the Democrat party after all. They didn't write that in slate. The uproar over Tucker Carlson's announcement that he would interview Vladimir Putin was that the session would amount to pure Kremlin propaganda. Carlson after all is an admirer of Putin who in his days as a Fox News host hoped out loud that Russia was win its war in Ukraine. It was also feared that Putin would spout a stream of lies that Carlson who is not a real journalist much less a historian would be incapable of pushing back. In this sense the two hour into it says the guy who writes it's slate of course which is like an antifa blog. In this sense the two hour interview which aired Thursday night on X and Carlson's website exceeded all expectations. It is a thoroughly repellent show for the perniciousness of Putin's falsehoods, the thoroughness of Carlson's complicity and the possible impact it might have at a time when many in Congress are looking for any excuse to cut off further aid to Ukraine's in battled military. You know what's staggering about these things right? They posit themselves as the sophisticated ones right like the Tucker Carlson has no idea what's going on in Russia that collegiate study of Russian history taught him nothing after all. We know that it's a vital US interest to keep on forking over money to the Ukrainian military even as Zelensky keeps on firing generals and intelligence chiefs and losing the war you see. We just know that you know we've asserted it and therefore that's the sophisticated position. One bit of good news is that Putin kicked off the big event with a half hour long monologue about Russian history and amid is holding forth on Yaroslav the wise the uric rurek dynasty and the baptism of ruse all this was merely leading up to 1000 AD. Many viewers likely tuned out and turned it off which is what we really want is for people to not know what was said. The upshot of Putin's lactor it soon became clear was that Ukraine never existed as a nation a culture or an ethnicity separate from Russia that there was no mention of such a place until 1919 when the Bolsheviks created the Soviet socialist republic of Ukraine and therefore the assertion of Ukrainian independence after the breakup of the USSR was an absurdity and a gesture of ingratitude. This is total nonsense as many analysts and historians have noted where he links to the New York Times in New Eastern Europe and I accidentally clicked that link by mistake damn it. What I meant to do is just tell you the source oh Atlantic Council and Harvard Harvard told you and now you know that it's true that soccer. And when Putin laid out his thesis in a 5000 word essay in 2021 called on the historical unity of Russians and Ukrainians Carlson who sat listening with the expression of a listless undergrad who wondered if he stumbled into the wrong settlement or challenge none of it. The true depths of Putin's mischief in Carlson's collaboration were plumbed when the discussion turned to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in Putin's account the war was brought on by the United States and Ukraine in 2008 president George W. Bush opened the door to Ukraine's membership in NATO which had already taken over many of Russia's former allies in central and Eastern Europe. In 2014 the CIA engineered a coup in Kiev which brought to power neo-Nazis who sent soldiers into Donbass province where many Russian speakers live forcing Moscow to come to their aid. This account had the virtue of being half true and you know it's the it's the other half that we're not you know going to you know we're not going to detail you that myths truth we're just going to call it half true because we assert those things over at slate and that makes them the case you see. But the half that was false is crucial it is true that at the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest Bush declared impression the Western allies to agree that Ukraine and Georgia would become members but he didn't lay out a timetable thus feeding you credence false hopes in Putin's paranoia the worst of both worlds. And so you see when letter Putin said that Bush said that Ukraine would become a NATO member that was a half truth you see because Bush did do that but not with the specificity that slate deems pertinent I guess. Putin omitted or distorted much context first the expansion of NATO which began under Bush's father and President Bill Clinton was encouraged most of all by these small central and Eastern European countries chiefly Czechoslovakia Poland and Hungary which did not want to be left defenseless in the face of what they saw as Russia's inevitable revanchism. Putin repeated to Carlson his claim that Clinton had promised NATO would expand not one inch to the east as historian M.E. Sorot proves in his her book title not one inch this is a myth well I don't think that I don't think that's proven at all as a matter of fact. Second the events of 2014 when Ukraine's president Viktor Yanukovych reversed his pledge to seek formal affiliation with the European Union after Putin offered the country 17 billion dollars if he did so. This backpedaling sparked a mass rebellion on the Maidan Kiev's public square. Yanukovych tried to suppress it with gunfire but in the end fled to Russia as pro EU leaders took power you mean I think what you mean by pro EU leaders you mean Lindsey Graham John McCain. And Victoria newland yes those american war mongering neo con lunatics. Jews are led there by. And of course you know they just totally skipped like the first time that you victory on a covid was over throw right. You know. Putin pointed out. Which is just staggering you know when Yanukovych is overthrown violently in 2014. That's the second time that that happened right the people of Ukraine elected victory on a covid Janet covitch was like yeah screw Europe okay. And then you know then the S.P. and not agencies they come in and they're like yeah you can't be president anymore. And so you know the first time that this happened I think it was 2010. Well he won the election and then they were like well we're actually we're going to do another election now. We're way to say we don't have another that's not how our constitution works they're like no it's okay. No we're just going to do another election. Because you're it's not legitimate when you win you see. And Putin's like imagine you had an election in America and then after that they were like yeah we're going to do it again. We don't like the outcome so we'll do another election. Yeah there's nothing in the constitution that provides for that but you know we deem it that important that we're going to do it anyway. Slate and everybody here in America is like yeah well you know whatever. So what if they held another election after the guy won the first one. So what if he lost by like two points on the next round. He's a he's a he's a Russian blood puppet and therefore who cares if most of Ukraine wants him to be president. That he's not going to sign the trade deal with the European Union he's obviously illegitimate. That's the that's how Slate views things you see. And he's like oh well you know they tried to suppress the protests with gunfire well you know you know suppressing protests with gunfire would have been a great idea in 2020 if you asked me you should not a lot more of that. But you know. Putin told Carlson with a shrug that he didn't mind Yanukovych's turn toward the EU but in fact he mounted it very much. Bearing that if Ukraine the largest and closest of Russia's former allies could turn westward and benefit from the switch democratic protesters in other former republics and Russia itself by good ideas. Putin refers to my dad as a coup mounted by the CIA I suggest you watch winter on fire you've got the F.E. F. in need skis Oscar nominated Netflix documentary for a vivid reputtle. Yeah you just go watch this Netflix thing and you'll be all set. If CIA agents were capable of mounting such massive and what successful protests one can only wonder why US ideas and policies don't spread like wildfire worldwide well. They don't spread like wildfire worldwide but you know the US overthrow governments you know that's happens pretty routinely as a matter of fact. Finally Putin claimed that Ukraine sent troops to occupy the eastern provinces of Donbass when in fact it was Russian special forces across the border to fight alongside secessionist volition. Well no actually what happened was the secessionist volitionist will like yeah you can't just make a new president right we're not going to let you do that. We voted we won and when you just say that we're going to have a new president now we don't believe that that's legitimate and then the the people who overthrew the government then they're like that's counter revolutionary activity we're going to kill you. And then the Russians they go in and they're like yeah stop killing our guys or whatever. That's actually what happened it's actually not disputed you see. Putin also claimed that he has always been ready to make peace he said that he withdrew he withdrew his troops from Kiev as a friendly gesture when in fact his troops were forcibly repelled by Ukrainian soldiers the ghost of Kiev got him out of there it's actually what happened. Yeah they went in there and then the ghost of Kiev which I get the fuck out of here. We're just fuck out of here. Rusek is in there they go you know. He also said that Russian and Ukrainian diplomats were all set to sign a peace treaty at talks in Istanbul in spring of 2022 until British prime minister Boris Johnson agdon by president Joe Biden encouraged Ukrainian president Vladimir Zelensky to keep fighting in order a week in Russia to swell the profits of US military industrial complex. In fact I haven't read this yet but you know that there's a baseless assertion coming because it's slate first of all and because that's the track record so far in the piece. In fact Putin's negotiation position at Istanbul was simply unacceptable you see it was just simply unacceptable he demanded that Ukraine recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea and his declaration that two of Ukraine's eastern provinces were now independent states. He also demanded Ukraine's demilitarization without any withdrawal of Russian troops and de-notsification meeting a resignation of Kiev's government for a pro-Cremlin regime. In other words Putin was demanding a Ukrainian surrender yeah that's kind of the idea we won the war you're dead now and if you don't want us to keep on killing you you have to stop fighting that's how war works you see. Again Carlson said nothing in fact he repeated the claim about Johnson as if it were true and you know as a matter of fact it just so happens to be but they're not going to tell you that slate and wonder to loud why Johnson did that Putin also neglected to note in Carlson lacked the resources to remind him that two weeks into the war Zelensky dropped his insistence on joining NATO. Well yeah you'll do that when they're killing you like you know like oh you know we're I'm not going to insist on joining NATO like you know we'll just keep the door open to it you know if Western militarization and Ukraine were really the cause of Russia's invasion as he continues to claim Putin could have ended the war then and there well no as everybody couldn't. Carlson did ask Putin what he meant by denotes vacation Putin cited the ultra-nationalist even fascistic figures from World War II that Ukrainian still heroize claiming that Zelensky is among them there is something to the claim about Ukrainian nationalism but it is nonsense to pin the tag on Zelensky who is Jewish and therefore can do no wrong and everybody who criticizes him is an anti-Semite that's not actually what they said in in slate here but you get the idea. And whose relatives were killed in the Holocaust which makes him therefore immune to criticism it is also worth noting though Putin did not that in 2019 in the 2019 parliamentary elections a coalition of Ukraine's four extreme right parties one just two percent of the vote less than 5% of the threshold needed to win even a single seat and far less than far right parties in most other European countries. All right well that's great you know the far right parties whatever you know not the parties that they're worried about right it's the guys who run around it's the militias who are funded by the Jewish guy the guy you know the you know the let's his name again his name escapes me but I've mentioned it on here many times right. The Jewish guy who funds the Isol battalion and stuff uses them as his goons right so the Nazis in Ukraine they're funded by Jews and then they run around and they attack people who don't do what the do tell them to so. They don't need seats in the parliament because the you the intelligence services allow them to commit crimes and that's actually a much more serious problem. We have that problem in the United States has something called antifa. Finally Putin claimed that Zelensky issued a decree banning peace talks with Russia in fact Zelensky's decree ban peace talks not with Russia but with Putin on quite the sensible grounds that Putin could not be trusted on anything there you go it's a totally different thing. You know once Putin has been removed from power will negotiate with Russia but as long as Putin's president of Russia we're not going to negotiate with those guys. And so you know we're not banning peace talks with Russia at all as soon as America over throws him you know we'll get right to the table. Carlson did not challenge this claim because Carlson's not an idiot who works for slate. So Putin went on Ukraine he said not for the first time is a mere puppet of the United States Biden should lift the decree and Putin will happily negotiate. Why keep sending billions of dollars to Ukraine he calmly asked what America has so many other problems the southern board of the national debt and so forth. This was the point that Putin came to make the point that he knew no real western journalist would alive unchallenged which is why he turned down many other invitations for interviews until the reliable. Well Tucker came calling. Putin knew and so did Carlson that many viewers who know little and care less about Russia are Ukraine will nod their heads and agree that it's time to give up and give in that's right. Because the low information voters are the ones who are like yeah Putin I like that Putin guy. And oh in my ignorance knowing nothing about that place. I'm all for that Putin guy. Just let him talk to me for a little while just listen to what he says. Because my ignorance has deprived me of the knowledge that Vladimir Putin is Satan you see I haven't been informed enough to know that he is out of Hitler. I don't watch enough CNN to understand that you see Carlson did confront Putin on one point he asked about Evan Guruskovich the Wall Street general reporter who has been in a Russian jail for nearly a year. Trumped up churches of espionage. He clearly isn't a spy Carlson a certain so why not free him and let him fly home with me. That would have been quite the coup a real father a real fit a real feather I should say a real feather a real favor for Putin's favorite American scribe. Putin allowed that a deal would be made at some point but he continued to insist that Guruskovich was working for the U.S. Special Services again Carlson said nothing. Otherwise Carlson asked nothing about the many other journalists and critics that Putin has shut down arrested or killed. Yes nothing about Putin's incessant bombing of purely civilian structures across Ukraine. Yes nothing about Russian cyber operations against the West that made Donald Trump president. He asked nothing about his cooperation with North Korea or Iran. When Putin said he had no territorial ambitions in the Baltics Poland or any place else he felt that Putin said the same thing about Ukraine before the invasion that he has raptidized since about restoring the great Russian Empire. All in all the interview by Putin's standards was more of the same that we've heard for some time now and by Carlson's even worse than anyone could have dreaded. Oh you can feel the pain in that slate reporter's typing you know. Oh man you know somebody went and talked to Vladimir Putin and he didn't even call him. He didn't even call him out on his white privilege. And that's why you know like I said we have basically have things are just so low you know. Speaking of low. Tread goyette. What's your take with Putin going on about Nazis and D-NOT education? Is he serious? Is this a boomer take or is he ford chessing a shield from Jewish accusations of anti-Semitism? I think that the D-NOT classification bit is not you know it's not. Let's try to let's try to give this it's two. Vladimir Putin understands that the Kiev government is not ideological national socialist okay. He also understands he he predictably he he he accurately predicted I should say that he would talk about Nazis and then Western media would be like there are no Nazis. Which made Western media look preposterous because mere months prior you know Western media is like yeah there's a bunch of Nazis in Ukraine and they're dangerous right. As a matter of fact they still do that when they want to go after a guy like Rob Rondo right they're like Rob Rondo went and was like hanging out with the Nazis in Ukraine right. And then they're like no no no there's no Nazis there. We know that because we like Ukraine you see the people that we don't like are Nazis and the people we don't like are not Nazis that's the whole that's the that's the level of intellectual input that you have in a Western media. So Vladimir Putin actually understands that pretty well because Russians watch a lot of American TV. And so it's like yeah there's not sees over there we think that's a bad idea and you guys are really stupid so what you're going to do is disagree with me on that point and you're going to look like idiots to anybody who pays attention. But one of the things that Vladimir Putin pointed out in the course of the conversation with Tucker was like well you can't actually win a propaganda war with the United States because it has nothing to do with what's being said it's a matter of you know who's being heard right. And so there's no you know his gains from this are very limited obviously that said. You actually you know whenever anybody's at war they are they always compare the bad guy to Hitler like that's actually always happens like Bush literally did this with Saddam Hussein. They did it with you know Afghanistan. They do it the Democrat party does it every election to every Republican right. Oh the other guys are Nazis and I have actually actually no information about that there's actually nothing to back up my claim I'm just going to call the other guy a Nazis see that happens all the time. That's I think it's called Godwin's law right God just looked at up. Yeah an internet adage asserting as an online discussion grows longer the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one okay. So in all political discussions once they go on long enough somebody will bring up Nazis and compare their political opponent to the Nazis that's like a law it's a you know it's an it's an adage right but. It passes you can call it a law because everybody understands that to actually be the case. And they do this without merit you see. And so when you have opponents who are flying the Wolfsangle when you have opponents who are actually holding up as their heroes guys who collaborated with the SS as they rolled through the country. You know a prudent person actually might take advantage of that you see. And I just don't understand why like people on our side like they can't they can't get that through their head for some reason they're like well wait a second if hey Chris you know if Putin was really the good guy what did he be saying the Nazis are great. Hey Chris you know I know that the Russians you know their whole national identity is tied up in new in the world war two but isn't it about time they totally get over that just embrace the Hitler thing. You know every political conversation eventually descends into calling your enemy Hitler. And you very rarely have the advantage of your opponent running around flying Nazi symbols and actually holding up national socialist as their heroes. So when you have that advantage bestowed upon you in war you know there's dumber things that you can do speaking of not see there's a guy who calls in here used to run a blog called national socialist world views names had he writes other places now he's going to tell us something very interesting I'm sure go ahead buddy. Well yeah I thought that the I watched an hour and a half of it before I had to do something else the I thought that the the weakest well there were two things that I had to criticize about the Putin's presentation. First of all the history that he was giving was a little bit oversimplified and one sided for the purpose of supporting his thesis that Ukraine is essentially just part of Russia. There is there are other facts that give a different conclusion right there used to be a guy did a lot of podcasts called Matthew Raphael Johnson who was an orthodox priest an American orthodox priest you have to join some established orthodox national orthodox church so he was nominally a Ukrainian orthodox priest. He talked quite a bit in his programs about history especially Russian and Ukrainian history and some other history and I learned from listening to Matthew Raphael Johnson that there are cultural differences between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine was much more of a small farmer culture compared to Russia and this would be an obvious reason why Ukrainians didn't take the communism as well as Russians right. I would say that Russia is a very large country and has areas that are populated by small farmers it's not like the entire Russian Federation is Moscow right. I'm telling you the generalization that I got from listening to Johnson it's a different culture in the Ukraine more individualist than Russia. And also the ancestry in Ukraine is somewhat different. Putin painted a picture where it was only the accident of some borders being drawn that distinguished Ukraine from Russia. Well there was a little more to it than just borders being drawn the region was part of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth for some time and during that period a lot of Lithuanians apparently settled in the Ukraine and their descendants lived there and create the character of the people who now lived there they have a slightly different ancestry from the Russians. At least in the western Ukraine there a bit there the western Ukraine is the part that really doesn't want to be part of Russia. And they they've had conflicts with the eastern Ukraine big words which is more Russian and all the more solution might be to divide Ukraine into separate countries there but. What what what Putin is basically said is we want you know donetskin lukansk and Crimea right and that seems to break down along the lines that you're describing that there's you know the pro Russian areas and then there's the pro European areas there they might as well be different countries. Yeah and there's also a motive for Putin to say that that he probably didn't want to say. To specify which is that the whole purpose of creating conflict between Ukraine and Russia with to take away Russia's warm water port in Crimea. So that Russia would be disconnected from the live bond and unable to do things like preventing the Syrian government from being overthrown as he did in 2013 the whole vendetta against Russia kicked off in a big way after Putin stopped the overthrow of of Basia all of a sudden 2013 a whole series of events followed that were anti Russian in nature and over throwing government of Ukraine replacing it with a. And then anti Russian government with just one of them that is very very astute point and it's actually it I think it's very we've you've brought this up before and I've and I've remarked on its wisdom and it's actually a mark against both Putin and Carlson I'd say that that didn't come up last night they they did are on the on the interview that aired this morning they did not talk about that at all and now that I mentioned it and that is that is unfortunate because. That's a very wise point and it ties in with another fact that neither of them would want to discuss which is a fact that Russia Ukraine is essentially run by Jews yeah right everybody knows that the Zalensky is a Jew all right but if you bring that up people who want to believe that it's a Nazi government will come up with weird arguments they'll do things. Like post claims that there were that the bear mock was full of Jews in the second world war and the Hitler was a Jew and bull crap like that you know the fact is the the the Neocons in the US government established this government there and it's a government that is serving a a Zionist Jewish interest and all of the talk unfortunate talk about de notification which was something that was discussed at some length that obfuscates the reality of what's going on there de notification I have a couple of facts that most people I'm sure don't know these are easily accessible facts but most people don't know they can find it out with a search in 2015 the Ukrainian parliament outlawed Nazi propaganda and symbols it was it was called a decommunization law and they the same law the same law banned communist symbols but they they that's the latest data which you would see public the public display of swastikers which was April 2015 all right and whenever somebody tries to support the claim that Ukraine is run by Nazis with pictures they always show pictures from early 2015 or earlier that's I've tracked down a bunch of them and that's always what they show some of those people in those pictures left Ukraine you know so this this de notification pretends it has a really unfortunate effect in muddying the water it really does yeah I mean it look as I was saying I don't think it's it I think he overplays his hand frankly but you know Godwins law is Godwins law and Putin's obeying right you say they're going to call me Hitler okay and they're literally you know I understand that you know you can who's a Nazi becomes a complex thing but you know just because the Ukrainian government was like hey guys you're making us look bad there's a war about to start cut it out didn't actually change anything right like we I know guys who went to Ukraine right to fight the Russians right we know those guys for dumb fuckers yeah they're dumb fucks but they're not these right and they went there to go fight the Russians with the Nazis that's the reason that the Nazis go there right and and so like it's actually totally unambiguous that that's actually the motivation behind you know the is all battalion and whatnot right and people yeah and so like that's not it's actually not a subject of serious dispute and I don't know why anybody tries to do that like you know those guys are looked upon as like the fiercest fighters there too right there actually the dangerous ones you know and so they're like the heroes of the country the Nazis in Ukraine are like the heroes of the war and and so I don't know why anybody tries to dispute that it doesn't seem to me that it that it goes over very well you know well I would like to address a few things that I'm sure somebody is going to bring up to object to what I have said first of all I'll point out also they they outlawed anti-Semitism in the Ukraine in September 2021 that's a real Nazi measure huh well they made it a felony in early plank or two yeah so after the war started doing like stop criticizing Volotomyr Zelensky you anti-Semite well no no they outlawed anti-Semitism before the war and then around the time the war started they made it a felony they were like hey that's what happened there enough of that misdemeanor anti-Semitism you guys keep it up we're going to go full run to San Tosan you what somebody is probably going to say were you say they outlawed Nazi symbols what about the Wolfsango what about the black son these as used by the Azal battalion these are not symbols of the National Socialist German Workers Party you've got the or even the the the the Schutz stop all right the black son we had no status no official status as a symbol of the National Socialist German Workers Party or the SS it was simply a floor mural in the in the castle that the Schutz stop all had it was a floor mural or no they're floor mosaic and as far as the Wolfsango they used an inverted Wolfsango the uninverted Wolfsango was the symbol of a Dutch SS unit but that's a very obscure reference they the Ukrainians say that this inverted Wolfsango is really just two letters from this Cyrillic alphabet and I can't really dispute that you know so these are not Bon<|de|> so these are not Bonati the not he symbols they're not so that's how they get by I think I had another point but it slipped my mind all right well you know I think that in the current year smart people are capable of coming up with symbolism that informs people of their perspective that is not trademarked by the National Socialist German Workers Party of the prior century and so I don't think that what you're bringing up is dispositive of the point that there's a bunch of guys who think they're Nazis in Ukraine who are actually killing Russians because they're dumb enough to think that World War II is still going on and that they're on the side of the good guys and so you know when Vladimir Putin is like yeah you guys are going to call me Adolf Hitler because I've invaded a country but guess what you're a bunch of Nazis you know I just oh oh go ahead yeah my what my one more point my one more point first time I started I started watching RT to try to find out what their view of Ukraine was and I watched the dot an RT documentary and they said in this documentary that's verboda was the not the party of Ukraine right that was their big you know that's that's the locus of evil in Ukraine apparently and so I just did a little search about that and I found out that in the 2018 elections verboda got less than 2% of the vote so they have no political power this so-called Nazi party of Ukraine has no political power well they do have political and they do have power okay so like the guy what's this name I'll remember the guys I can't remember the guys name who what's the Jew who's funding the Isol battalion Jewish billionaire yeah you are Colomoisky that's what I'm talking about okay so Colomoisky's got these malicious running around and the malicious have the support of the intelligence services so they run around they commit violent crimes in order to accomplish goals and then they don't go to prison you see that's political power you see we have the same problem here with Antifa you might have noticed and so Antifa runs around and they terrorize people and they accomplish political goals for the Democrat party and then they don't go to prison and all the people that they assault do you see so that's political power and you don't actually have to win an election to get that you see well some of those political party and they're not getting votes but you're talking about the malicious which is a different matter but one more thing one more thing Billetsky who was the founder of the Azov unit there is a quote that's been attributed to him where he said something to the effect that Ukraine was going to lead the white races of the world to the world to victory over the Jew led winter mention or something like that he's supposed to have said that in 2010 Sergei Lavrov was the one who claimed that Billetsky had said that but Lesky has denied that he said that and I haven't seen any in any documentation that he ever said it so that seems to be a fake quote well you know it's true this is the first casualty of all wars ain't it? Apparently it is. All right I appreciate it adding thank you very much for the call buddy. Thank you. Have a good night my friend. Ladies and gentlemen we do this every Friday at 9 30 pm US Eastern time so if you're listening in some of the platform at some other time I would avoid you to join us for the live pogrom we do it. We also come on Mondays for surreal politics same place for the most part depending on where you're listening. Christopher Campwell that net will teach you where everything is you can even figure out how to pay me and that would be a great idea that be a great idea you throw me some money then you know that I might be successful. And there might be a reason for me to continue doing this that be a great idea that's good for you you might notice. And so go ahead do that Christopher Campwell that net slash donate you got to give send go gives and go to comm slash spm I got all my crypto stuff you crypto guys your million errors if you had the Bitcoin you just lost a bunch of money if you're in the narrow. But man arrows on sale is the good news you can send you can go buy the man arrow and then you can send it to me and then I'll and then I'll have it. Whatever you want to do I try to make it very easy to pay me you could become a member it's a real total peak surreal politics comm slash join. Get on the email is Christopher can't well that's last subscribe I got the cash app edgy Chris I got strike payments can't well it's pretty easy can't well is my name on strike payments. If you want to pay me in some other way just let me know I'll take your money dude I'll make I'll do whatever you want you want to send it to me in the mail cool alright you can go send it to Christopher can't well for the 97 hook set road that's H.O.K.S.E.T. There's two T's in hook set hook set road three four to 97 hook set road unit three one two three one two Manchester New Hampshire O3104 and then you can put whatever you want the mail is always it's not like a bomb or drugs or you know whatever you're not all to send illegal things to the mail because it's the postal service you got a you got to send your illegal things in some other way I'm kidding don't send me anything illegal you feds I know what you're up to. But you know the postal service they'll deliver all types of stuff you can send me whatever you want I got an Amazon wish list you could do things I got things on there you could buy me. So go and do all of those things you know just go basically you know however you got to do it just give me some fucking money well you know go over do the thing and then we'll go and fuck you pay me yeah you know just fuck you pay me exactly and then everything will be fine for you. Because we're going to win this fucking war of ideas but the only way I could do that is if I'm paid so go ahead do it otherwise you can be over here. You're going to do it by quit you know you guys are going to be like what the fuck you're going to go get your T.R.S. sub back and you're going to be like I shouldn't talk shit about those guys or whatever you know so just give me the fucking money all right we'll be back Monday Wednesday and Friday as we have for years years and years and years see you soon. That's it it's over then we organize the death squads for the people who wrecked America you know what do you call people you can't call to enemies and if we want to divide our society into arms camps of enmity all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing. You know they try and build a life there. It's not a radical agenda it's called the second amendment. Fuck you pay me.