and now that the local recording has begun that means we're ready to start the show kids and that's a good thing indeed because we gotta we got quite a show for you and so instead of me using my soundboard to play at intrep music i got a little special special treat for you today and this is uh this little promo video i put together to get the show started and so here it is all i really want is something to be my vote is safe all right let's focus on my question no i'm not gonna focus on your dishonest question you wind you piece of shit you're trying to frame something wondering i'm telling you what it is and now you have it i keep searching never been able to find a light behind your dead eyes not anything at all you keep living in your own life ever deceitful ever unfaithful keep me guessing keep me terrified take everything from my world oh so when did you get into as you said the rain starts when is the trail on martin k-tam and you know the michael brown and some your rational least different things happen every single case it's some little black and whole behavior like a savage and you get some self-intro trust you know whatever whatever friends i might have uh with uh my fellow wifey that uh things they generally are not inclined to such be hate your head so i kind of take that into the ratio when you're when you're thinking about how to work as you're just like i'm gonna be one more i'm gonna say can you help me ride the wall i'm saying what you can't let me leave you to the walls all i really want is something we're in full of shame keep me guessing keep me terrified all i really want is something we're in full of shame keep me living in your own life all we really want is something we're in full of shame we're in full of shame what you can't let me leave you to the walls we're in full of shame keep me living in your own life all we really want is something we're in full of shame keep me checking your body all we really want is something we're in full of shame with the family they base me dude i love you come here i'm saying can you help me ride the wall i'm saying what you can't let me leave you to the walls all i really want is something we're in full of shame we're in so much of the spirit of shame what you can't let me leave you to the walls we're in full of shame keep me keeping in your own life all we really want is something we're in full of shame we're in a phase what you can't let me leave you to the walls that's it it's over then we organize the death squads for the people who wrecked America you know what do you call people you can't call to enemies and if we want to divide our society into arms, camps, and enmity all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing a radical edge of the event has turned into an opportunity for the left to push a racial and radical agenda implementing their radical agenda is the only thing they tell about their bad efforts but they want to do here this ramp their radical agenda down your throat all right on with it welcome to the radical agenda to show about timeless ideas and news of the day whatever's on your mind at 217 688 1433 yes this agenda is quite radical and welcome to it this 50th episode of the Sixth Stage of the Pogrom today is January 12, 2024 is a current year it's a Friday as usual we are coming alive once again from my undisclosed location where you know I must at times resist the temptation or read my own words over and over again not often but occasionally when I know that I have done something really impressive and when that happens I feel very powerful that's what I want to do all the time when I put out material that is not so good which necessarily occurs when one works on a schedule I feel like a failure or worse yet a thief my obligation is to write and say impressive things and if I don't if I put out something that's less than impressive I feel like I'm a kid trying to pass off a regano is marijuana knowing that sooner or later one of my buyers is going to kick my ass so if something is really good I analyze what I've done and I try to think how I can recreate this more consistently even then I have to struggle to try to be analytical about it there's the temptation I just marvel at my own genius so to speak if I begin to think of myself as too prideful this problem is quickly remedied by self hatred for that character flaw I so despise in others I'm no mechanic about my words of course my best work comes quite involuntarily most of you will never see nor hear the best things I've ever written or said because they are private some none will ever see because they are private communications I opted not to send at all I've written love letters and angry tirades against people in my life and as I perforied them before sending I realized that to dispatch this message would have practical outcomes not worth the satisfaction of delivery my drafts folders are quite the emotional roller coaster in recent months I have come to enjoy printing things out and holding them in my hand I never used to do that I began this practice largely my correspondence with Robert Rondo I really respect that guy and I want to make sure that when I sent him was perfect so even after I read it a dozen times on my screen I printed it out and wanted to make sure that the physical copy was presentable as I did this I felt the weight of my words on the paper this was no longer a mere thought it was now tangible I could hold it I realized that in this medium I noticed errors I had not noticed on the screen I began to care much more about fonts I thought for the first time outside of sending out resumes years ago that I should perhaps acquire higher quality paper than the cheapest white copy sheets that have comprised nearly all of my purchases to date I sometimes muse about what will happen after I die perhaps some enthusiasts will pour over all of this unreleased material and make selected works available or perhaps it will be lost forever the paradoxical thought enters my mind that I should hasten my own demise just to find out which one it will be sometimes I think that there are things I can release after the other person dies the thought crosses my mind to wish death upon them just for that reason and I become overwhelmed with guilt at my pride and self-centeredness for even considering it there's a letter printed out on my desk right now I composed to a woman which I've not yet sent I don't know if I will we once very much in love and she wants me back but this is not to be it is not easy for me to say no because I could benefit greatly from a woman's presence right about now and so as I composed this rejection I made the argument quite forceful largely for my own benefit and what I had to say about it was quite the stinging indictment of her she's not doing so well and this has caused her to reflect on her errors and apologize to me I appreciated the sincerity of her regrets but she still does not appreciate fully the permanence of the damage that she has caused part of me thinks that she needs to gain that awareness and that I'd be helping her a great deal to deliver this but another part of me feels I'd be committing an act of violence to use this power I wield against an unarmed opponent who begs for my mercy I briefly chuckle to myself hearing the announcer in mortal combat say finish her that thought that I might damage a woman by privately telling her the truth led me to think about the combat of nature of my speech as an anti-Semite with my enemies being among the most cunning linguists I'm used to myself that I was like neo in the matrix the one I was the anomaly inherent in the system that inevitably one would emerge who had the power to do verbal combat with them and that all the agents of the system would drop everything to try to destroy me but I'd not have to dodge their bullets I might let them penetrate me and casually spit them out or am I just wave my hand and cause them to stop mid-flight it felt that way in a Virginia courtroom at the end of 2021 my opponents would lie unconvincingly and I would rise from my seat rub my wrist with a handcuffs it been moments ago speak truth with conviction I would see the fear in their eyes and the nodding approval of the jurors it felt like total victory until that jury returned their partial verdict I had defeated them in a meaningful sense with no verdict returned on the central accusation but they were nonetheless awarded millions of dollars and damages which I have neither the desire nor the capacity to pay in two weeks I'll have my rematch as oral arguments are scheduled in the appeal of that verdict for January 25th of 2024 and of course as always I'm handicapped given my power that almost seems fair the plaintiffs and the defense have the same amount of time to make their oral arguments me and all of my co-defendants who are not all on the same side and who do not have the same arguments to make share the same pool of time our enemies with one single unified front have an identical amount of time to make their case so all of my power must be narrowly focused like a center punch it must be a sharp blow that shatters the entire structure by taking out the most vital supports I will not have the ability to analytically dismantle it beam by beam in martial arts you learn this you do not strike with the widest part of your hand or foot generally when fighting concentrating all the energy into the smallest point possible delivers the energy to the smallest possible point for the greatest impact in the most damage this is why knives and stabbing weapons are so lethal the smaller the point the more kinetic energy is placed upon the least amount of resistance and thus the penetration is devastating a bullet function similarly when you look at a cartridge you see the bullet the casing and the primer but when that bullet comes out it is much smaller than the full cartridge hollow points enter the target is one shape and emerge or disperse within the target quite differently they expand and break apart to shatter bone and shred flesh and organs for maximum effect I do this with my words I have learned over the years that what one does not say is sometimes more powerful than what one does the loaded phrase enters the mind and expands instead of saying it all deliver only the implication which causes the target to connect the dots involuntarily in this way you control their thoughts as the words rattle around in their brains like Pac-Man even as you were still penetrating them with yet more words if you could deliver repeated blows like this they don't have time to recover between impacts and the effect is devastating the other day I published some members only content on chrismerkentwell.net titled fun with online dating scammers with only the slightest bit of embarrassment I disclosed that I had begun speaking to a single mother on an online dating website who asked me for forty six dollars to pay for her autistic child's medication although we had not yet met I talked her on the phone to make sure she was in fact a woman and a native English speaker and that her phone number was in fact local and I checked to see if it was not some kind of voice over IP service and then I sent her sixty dollars via cash app and she thank me for this profusely it was by no means lost on me the potential that this could be some kind of calm part of the in fact hope it would be the most important part of my social life these days is weeding out bad actors and sixty dollars is a small price to pay to avoid the dangers involved letting bad people women in particular get close to me this was on Wednesday night just before the surreal politics member show was to be get so we agreed that I would text her when I was done and we talk more than after I was done I did text her and she did not respond the next morning she texted me back to apologize stating that she had some other sort of medical emergency with her child but she was looking forward to speaking to me again soon and so I notified her that roughly 30 minutes after my last unanswered text of the prior evening I logged into the site where we had met and it showed that she was online indicating that she had made a conscious decision to ignore me and that if she really did have a medical emergency with her child it said something that she was perusing a dating service while that went on her response was conspicuously defensive and since she has no match for me in verbal combat it was to me the screaming of a cornered prey animal I had a right where I wanted her I took a satisfaction in this not entirely dissimilar to that which I would have gained if she had removed her clothes in my presence she was equally vulnerable in that moment and I was about to penetrate her for my own selfish satisfaction she began with denials and accusations against me that I was of such poor character for being suspicious of her what kind of monster accuses the mother of a disabled child of exploiting her son for such a petty sum of money she was to me a cockroach who had stumbled across a glue trap with the effort of folding a piece of paper I took her most vigorous and lengthy defenses and disposed of them though she herself is white she then resorted to mocking me for being a white man saying that we have small dicks and that this is why she only dates blacks I responded by saying I suppose that explains the absence of a father figure in her mutant off springs life and her need to beg for forty six dollars on the internet to sustain his pathetic existence she was so damaged by the truth of this that she lost her composure she lied stating that in fact the black man who had sired her burden was sitting right next to her in that moment and that they were laughing at me for being so gullible as to give her money after meeting on a dating site and then I went in for the kill ah so you confessed that far from being gullible I've been right about you all along and for the price of sixty dollars I've avoided all the trouble that you would have brought into my life and not only this but you are sitting next to a black man who does not mind you talking to men on dating sites spending your nights on the internet trying to hustle forty six dollars from strangers on the internet and you think this makes you superior to the man who has sixty dollars to give you without it impacting his lifestyle that's amusing silence followed as tends to happen in death had I fucked her in the ass without a conum I'd have not been more satisfied she was mine I had taken possession of her more thoroughly than whoever put that mutant inside of her I'm used that the realization of what had become of her life would stay with her for at least as long as a child would if the child died before her she would remember this at its funeral the guilt that she would feel about her relief at his passing and the deep shame she felt rather than stripped of her defenses by my text would be as the fragments of a shattered hollow point scattered throughout her brain in her heart I took a great deal of satisfaction in the cruelty of this and it mixed curiously with my guilt sure she deserved it but she was no less a helpless victim of my superior force I was like a cat playing with a mouse and she liked the torn rodent not seeing the fun of the game panic trying to find any combination of words to stop the penetrating force of my language until she just stopped moving and like a cat might bring the mouse to its owner as a gift I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done I took the screenshots and brought them to those who feed me proud of what I had done Tony soprano respect when you see us you bet we got heaters sends fifty dollars milk truckers sorry about the comment left implying you were drunk it was new year's stream and you sounded off was meant to be a come on man shake my head type of comment wasn't trying to start shit been listening for a while thanks all right milk trucker thanks for the twenty five dollars and your your your apologies accepted and don't message that bitch back I guess he's talking about the the other one. You know I thought about you know one of the things what what was kind of funny about the exchange was that when I confronted her about her being online when she said that she was dealing with this medical emergency with her kid she was like oh well I'm going to go sell my TV to pay you back and of course what she's doing is trying to manipulate me right she's like she wants me to say oh don't sell your TV I'm sorry no I was like okay yeah go ahead do that and you know get me that money back right away because you're obviously trying to manipulate me and she just completely lost it and so you know it did occur to me to be like start pester and are like hey where's my money you know because that's a real self-own it's not it she did not give me like a you know I you know you could look up the carrier on a phone number if you don't know that there's like services you do this I've been doing this for many years having been deal with having had to deal with you know well I actually started the practice when I worked in a data center we used to do this to to try to track down fraudulent orders but I've been using it since then also to deal with you know harassing phone calls and prank calls to show and this sort of thing. So I looked it up it's an actual cell phone it's not it's not the you know when you when somebody has like text now or burner one of these you know disposable phone number things is a voice over IP services and you can see that it's a voice over IP service by looking it up. If you tried to if you try to get a telegram account with like one of these numbers you it won't say it won't let you do it tell you that the numbers band. And so I'm like okay well this is a real cell phone number like I could get a new phone number every two days a texture like where's my money bitch. But I don't I'm not going to do that that's not a good use of my time. It's so but it's still fun to think about you know. 2176881433 like to be on the program and more you tell us I have to so please do give us a call. I see what I want to go to next I've got um you know we on Wednesday we watch the trump town hall and the two days preceding that they had a trap town hall with Nikki Haley and a town hall we drawn the Santa's those were fairly unremarkable I haven't seen apparently wall the wall the trump town hall was going on. CNN did a debate between Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis and the ratings were you know I mean CNN to begin with you know you got CNN. But CNN. Which is just in the toilet to begin with. You got fox which is the number one cable news network. And then you've got Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis over on CNN you've got Trump on Fox News. So it doesn't take a genius to figure out which one of these is going to be better I mean which one is going to you know have more ratings I should say. But it was it was you know they they dominated you know president trump ventured into the lions then the other night otherwise known as fox news is reading from revolver. Trump hosted a town hall in Iowa right before the major caucus and he rocked it for online reactions or anything to go by Trump's town hall was a grand slam he successfully took on the two never Trump hosts and the network and not only emerged victorious but also exuded poise grace and presidential professionalism. Trump tackled the challenging questions with ease and clarity articulating his plan to make America great against once more again once more Trump united the country once and he plans to do it again. You have like ratings numbers for this revolver. All right well they don't have the exact ratings numbers it doesn't look like that is kind of unfortunate but I know the ratings were pretty significant difference. And I was actually kind of annoyed at Trump's what they're describing as you know poise grace and presidential professionalism I had remarked during the thing that you know these were like political answers from Donald Trump and that's not why I supported Donald Trump you know it was interesting about 2016 was that you just literally never knew what was going to happen next. Right. But Donald Trump would go from city to city making these has these rallies and he'd like make news every time he'd say some outrageous thing and everybody go insane right. But on Wednesday he was like you know he had you know adopted the skills of a politician say that you know somebody to ask him a question about you know any number of things and he would and he would resort I think he probably did this three or four times that he was asked an unrelated question he went to talking about energy you know. Oh well what we did with energy was just so great during my administration we're going to do it again once we do that then you know everything's going to be great. It's very political you know and I don't like that. I like it better than Joe Biden plenty you know but that's not what I came to Donald Trump for. But of course you know the guys all the way out front right why take the risks of going and saying bombastic dangerous things when you're all the way out there you don't have to take any chances. So he gets a pass but it's not nearly as interesting as 2016 was for sure. 2176881433 you like to be on the program and more you told the less I have to so please do give us a call. Caller you are on the radical agenda what you're agenda. Hey Chris I saw I saw something on Twitter today where apparently Delta sent out an internal memo to employees talking about how they should capitalize black and brown and Delta communication but white should be lower case. Not sure if you saw this but you know when I see things like this it just drives me crazy and I really wish we had a little bit more of a way to push back and. It's just one of those things where I think you know even a thousand bucks is some like Indian call center where we can flood their customer service lines and you know maybe put like 60 people on their chat cues just to destroy them or you heard them a little bit or do something I mean it's boycotting is really something I feel like it's practical delta. So this was you said this was Delta Airlines did this. Correct that's interesting man you know I I hadn't seen it yet I mean I've seen the phenomenon right I think I I seem to recall that. I don't want I want to say the Huffington Post it sort of started with this in their style guide but it was quickly adopted by even the associated press you know once the associated press does it then it's like. You know that's the official news speak right and so this is it's not a new phenomenon that people have been instructed to do things this way. But you know to see just see the airline doing it is is interesting I am irritated by it because like you know I do the exact opposite right I I capitalize W in white when I can have the presence of mine to do it and I don't capitalize you know black or whatever. And certainly is certainly not brown like the brown one is is more ridiculous as a matter of fact like the AP doesn't do that right so like the AP capitalizes the B in black but if they say brown they just say lower case B because you know that and there's a there's a reasonable theory to that which is that. You know black is almost like you know it's almost like Jewish right you're basically your it's a name now right it's not just. When I when I talk about this with Matt Hale he's like oh well I capitalize white because because the it's very important. I'm like well you know okay fine it's important I get that but that's actually not the the cause when I in my mind right it's it's you're talking about a name right you're capitalizing a name. And so in the case of black you can make you can make the same reasoning and not be a complete fanatic about it. For brown there's no you're not you're definitely not naming right that these are many different groups that you're identifying by color and it's a completely different category of idea. And so to capitalize the B in brown that's you know that's some next level fanatical stuff the AP doesn't do that. Yeah no 100% I just thought it was something wild and I just would like to see a little bit more of an immediate pushback for things like this and even if it is something silly like just getting some Indian to flood the line and maybe all of us to I mean hey there's 51 people watching you know I mean. Something's got to give and this is obviously a comment from an actually posted a link in the chat so people could see the actual screenshot and hey I'll just end it with this you know they might not capitalize w and white but I always capitalize in. Alright my friend thank you very much for the call. Good night you know yeah I think that that might be worth kicking an email or a tweet to Delta Airlines and being like hey and I'll tell you what else right you when I just pointed out was was meaningful okay. It's hard to get on Delta Airlines for adopting the AP style guide okay tell them that they're fanatics because they've gone and done the capitalized to be in brown okay. That is something that I think people who are not at all sympathetic to our ideas will be able to see that they're doing that that's a step above right they're going beyond the AP style guide they're actually doing something that's totally grammatically incorrect and there's actually no there's nothing resembling an excuse for doing that. And I think that that that has a potential to have some impact you know are they going to change their policy as on account of it probably not you know. But you can make them look ridiculous that's for sure I think that that's that's serious that's a there's a real potential for that. 2176881433 like to be on the program in a more or less I have to so please do give us a call caller you're on the radical agenda what you're agenda. Hey can you hear me I hate you fine pal. Hey there was a recently somebody that just got elected in Oklahoma to some kind of lower office and they find out he was a white nationalist and they basically ran him out of town. I was just kind of curious because because of that I mean a lot of a lot of people say we need to try to select our people for office but they'll bend over backwards to run these people out if they find out about him. So what's your take on that. Well I think I think I heard about this guy he was actually a unite to write a 10 D if I recall correctly right he says the same guy we're thinking of. Right okay you know well here's a thing obviously they're going to try to get rid of us right I mean it's not like that. And it's not like you get elected and then the contest is over I mean that's just you know that's not even the beginning right it's it's like the prequel you know. And so you know that's power that you know when you when you the closer you get to it the more of it you acquire the more resistance you beat until your power is so substantial that you can use your power to fend off challenges right. So it's I think it's the expected course of action that you know as our guys were to get elected they'd be you know snift out and people would try to run them out and you know that that just means that you have to keep on trying I think and of course the guy got my understanding of it is that the guy got elected he wasn't running on a white nationalist platform or whatever. It all about his platform but yeah he wasn't throwing Romans on the campaign trail he basically like you know he got elected as a as a regular you know politician saying things that everybody knows reasonable yeah go ahead. My understanding was he he'd been docked already before he got elected. I didn't know I mean I guess the the I'm not familiar with the story either but I think that's what I heard is he was docked already everybody knew about his affiliation. And they went ahead and elected him anyone. Well that's pretty cool I'd say you know and that's even that's even more significant then if that's the case I mean you know they are my my the way I catch wind of the story is they discover that this guy you know the whoever the activists are they discover that this guy is an office right and then they're like oh we've got to get about it here because he's this guy you know. And so if his you know if his leanings were known before that any managed to get elected out you know that's that's really significant and so you know I I'm kind of embarrassed that I haven't more fully understood the story of a monosidious I have seen wind of this. But you know that they're trying to run him out now okay fine you know it seems to me that they're probably going to be successful at it too but okay fine you know like that's that's the game you know that that you. You you you you you you you you acquire some power people try to take it back from you you resist them and you know maybe you lose it maybe you don't you know that's that's the contest you know and so. You know we ask me what might what I think about it that's that's basically it that yeah like they're not going to sit back and take that at all they're going to do everything in their power to stop you. And right now they're just trying to you know run the guy out of office or whatever and if they succeed then maybe they'll maybe they'll just make his life a living hell after that and call his employers or maybe they'll kill him you know I mean that's you know that's where this ultimately leads right I mean they'll they'll do anything to protect what they have you know they'll do there's nothing. They'll do there's nothing that they won't do and so you know that's that's the contest. Yeah it I could be wrong about that maybe everybody didn't know about his affiliation but he was he was docs ahead of time and maybe nobody picked up on it until he was actually elected but it seems to me like it's you know if we have our people known about they're they're not going to let him in office. I mean the party will change the rules to get them out if they know about it beforehand or they'll find out afterwards and they'll just make up new rules to get rid of them. Well yeah I don't think I was trying to get our people in the office necessarily the way to go maybe it has more to do with just changing the over to window to the point where they kind of know what side their bread is buttered on before they get elected. If I make sure you say well I think that I don't think that these things are disconnected from one another right so like you're moving the over to window and as a consequence of moving the over to window. People can get elected to office on different platforms or with different histories right or you get somebody into office and then people discover his politics while he's in office and that normalizes the the ideas which moves the over to window so these things are kind of. You know they're they're tethered say right. It's it's both you know what I mean it you know winning the election is not. You know when I talk about electoral politics it's not that winning the election is is the goal per say it is part of the it's part of the collection of data points you know if you control the narrative if you control a story if you control what what people perceive about a thing. Then winning the election just it happens as a matter of course that's obviously just what what happens because your ideas the dominant idea and therefore you win popularity contest right. When you don't have when you don't have the narrative then you know the the election I mean all you could do in in the election is culture jam you know you could go and be like hey I'm part of this contest therefore you should listen to me right that's that's all you can do when you don't have the narrative and that'll cause you to you know. But you know it to impact some people and talk to them you know I ran for Congress as a libertarian in 2010 and you know I didn't I didn't even make the ballot but you know I talked to thousands of people I shook their hands like I stood out on the beach and you know you collected ballot access signatures and I talk to people and you know a lot of them had ever heard the word libertarian before so I was like oh well here's what I believe and here's why I believe it and you know they they asked thoughtful questions some of them and others you know called me a capitalist pig monster whatever. You know someone who called me a racist and I didn't realize they were right for years you know and you know that's that's kind of all you can do if you don't have the narrative once you have the narrative then you know the election is just it's just it's just you know the business of the day. And so I think that it's both you know you're moving the over 10 window you're trying to acquire you know formal positions to cement your power and they have a they have a synergy between them you know. Sure yeah yeah. That's all I had on that did you see the the thing that Trump did to where the he was being interviewed and somebody was talking about using seal team six to assassinate his political enemies and Trump was basically like yeah the president needs immunity no matter what. Yeah so this was I thought that this was not an interview this was part of a court hearing if I recall correctly so like that there was a yeah yeah yeah and and it was like well if the president and and what his what his lawyer said in response to that was was absolutely correct right so the question if I my recollection of this is there was an appellate court hearing questioning the the issue of presidential immunity. And the one of the judges on the panel asked the Trump's lawyers are you saying that you know if the president has has sealed team six go and assassinate his political opponent that that that he has immunity and the lawyers are basically like well yeah of course you know there's a political process whereby you can essentially strip him of this that you can you can convict him in the Senate right you can impeach him and and and convict him and you can see that he's a lot of the same as the president. Convict him and then thereby you know remove him from office and then he'll be stripped of his immunity but without that conviction you can't strip him of his immunity and I think that that's that's perfectly sound you know it's as much as I would love to throw Joe Biden and a lot of other politicians in prison or worse. You know he's absolutely correct that if if the next administration can just come in and say that whatever you did is a crime and prosecute you then you know the presidency will cease to exist functionally like that actually has to happen the president can't be thinking that without the without the political process that the next administration just comes in and prosecutes him and I think that that's a totally sound argument and I think that that's probably it's reasonable to me that the supreme court. Court could step in and say yes this is obviously inherent to the powers of the president you know but that also you know I think it's Bell's danger for the future say because every president after Donald Trump will be citing you know Trump the United States or whatever and saying like no of course you know doesn't matter how many people I raped and murdered while I was president you know the Senate didn't get around to impeaching me and therefore I can do whatever I want you know. And so you know we're heading for dangerous times in the United States were there very clearly but you know whatever he has to do is what he has to do there's no way that like he can this case against him these cases I should say you know they all have to be categorically destroyed like he can't you know we're heading for a situation where he's likely to win the election and be thrown in prisons you know in in relatively you know in correlating timelines. And so like that civil war right there that's that's the definition of a constitutional crisis and so the courts are going to have to step in and do something and that seems like a sound way to do it. Right now it makes sense when you put it like that but the way they edited the clip it was just hilarious. Oh yeah. Yeah so I saw that too so like some of the media was running around being like oh well Trump's lawyer say that you know when he's president he could just have seal team six go around whacking his political opponents like no he's saying that there's a there's a formal process. You know but the media was just like yeah he says that he could go and have people murdered you know it's like well no you know the the the democratic congress was not shy about impeaching Trump twice right they did it after he was out of office you know they they understand full well the powers of impeachment it's just that they didn't have anything on him that they could convict him on and therefore you know it was a party line vote say for Mitt Romney and so like you know if he if Donald Trump had gone and had Joe Biden assassinated by seal team six something tells me that it doesn't Republicans that it jumped shipped in the Senate you know like that probably would have happened you know if we ever have a Republican party that united that they'll allow the president to get away with murdering people well well dear God I look forward to that day but we don't live there now. Yeah well right man thanks for taking my call. Thank you very much for making a call to one seven six eight one four three three like to be on the program and the more you told the less I have to please do give us a call now let's see here. Um let's see yeah. All right you know what I'm actually going to play in other words as weapons song and I'll be right back. Give me give me a couple minutes to pull up some stories. Yeah. My words are weapons. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. I've never shown no emotion words. Welcome back to the radical agenda. There is a tunnel in Brooklyn because Jews are crazy. The house is a synagogue. Apparently they disrupted the structure of the building in the process. Video reveals the inside of a bizarre tunnel built by a group of young Hasidic Jewish men Underneath the historic Brooklyn synagogue, the footage posted on crownheights.info's instagram Leads viewers down the stairs and through hallways to a dirt-filled room Where roughly two by two foot great has been removed from the wall of the building Which is adjacent to the Jabad Loubovich World Headquarters in Crown Heights The videographer then crawls through the hole which leads to a three foot tunnel That reportedly extends about 50 feet and around two corners to the headquarters location Of its shuttered men's ritual bath Photos shared on Crownheights.info's website show a beer can on one side of the tunnel In an electrical wire hanging in the adjacent buildings dirt-filled room Clothes and other items can be seen scattered around apparently left by the renegade diggers of the Jabad Loubovich movement The electro members of the movement advanced by the late Rabbi Menachai Mendol Schneerson Had reportedly been digging the tunnel under the 100 year old synagogue for nearly a year The tunnel apparently was designed to reach the abandoned men's mikfa or ritual bath around the corner to expand the synagogue According to the Jewish outlet forward The underground pathway was not discovered until last month when neighbors reported suspicious noises coming from beneath their homes Israel National News reported Sometime ago a group of extremist students broke through a few walls in adjacent properties to the synagogue at 787-847-88 Eastern Parkway to provide them unauthorized access Rabbi Mati Seligson spoke for Jabad Loubovich said in I'm sorry, spokesman for Jabad Loubovich said in an emailed statement to the post Earlier today, a cement truck was brought in to repair those walls as efforts were disrupted by the extremists who broke through the wall to the synagogue Vandalizing the sanctuary in an effort to preserve their unauthorized access They have since been arrested in the building closed pending a structural safety review Loubovich officials have attempted to gain proper control of the premises through the New York State court system Unfortunately, despite consistently prevailing in court the process is dragged on for years Seligson said This is obviously deeply distressing to the Loubovich movement in the Jewish community worldwide We hope and pray to be able to expeditiously restore the sanctuary, sanctity and decorum of this holy place Another statement from the headquarters added that a group of young agitators were primarily the US students on visas These individuals have been squatting in the synagogue and attempted to take control by demolishing the walls to connect to the basement to the adjacent building Intending to expand the sanctuary, it said steps are being taken to revoke their student visas and repatriate them to their countries of origin After the tunnels discovery the synagogue leadership called in structural engineers to assess the building damage and on Monday cement mixers arrived to fill it in Sparking a riot the group of rennate the renegade orthodox Jewish men thought to be mostly in their teens and twenties were filming Films tearing down wood panels and wooden support beams as they desperately tried to get into their tunnel Other footage from the temple on the eastern parkway showed cops trying to hold back dozens of Hasidic Jewish men as they pushed their way into the 20 foot wide enclosure Toppling over wooden pews with their anger A dozen men were taken into custody sources told the post Ten received criminal misdemeanor charges another was charged with obstructing governmental administration while one received a summit for disorderly conduct sources said no injuries were reported in the brawl Isn't that insurrection when you buy force try to prevent government administration I just distinctly remember that being being the case The clash involves the headquarters of the former home of Schneerson a site that has been at the center of previous controversies of violent incident in 2004 over a plaque outside the building led to a lawsuit over who was the proper owner and in 2006 in New York court gave control to building to a Goudith Chassidi Chabad Now I'm reading this and maybe I'm missing something somebody want to call in and correct me when I at first heard about this my understanding was that they had they had dug under the synagogue in order to like evade COVID controls or something I don't know if I'm missing something or if the post this is for eating for the New York post I just there's another story in the post here I'm seeing if it has anything else it now maybe I'm missing something I thought that they had tried to I thought that they had tried to subvert COVID controls but they said that this was like a year in the making or something so maybe I'm missing something call or you're on the radical agenda what you're doing yeah I'm yeah I Chris say I called in a couple weeks ago and I was talking about that John Francois Garpe die maybe miss put out his name I'm not from swag getty Garpe that's it Garpe and I just talked about how he put out a video saying that you know if you want to have a libertarian society you're going to have to shut some people out I said I agree with that and so on and so forth before I get to my main comment I just want to say I think another list or call be a low bird and well I'm used to yeah well I'm you know hey I've been involved with politics for a long time and I've been called every name in the book but depending on how you want to define the term a low bird I don't think I'm a low bird I've got the definition of low bird hold up on my computer here it says a derogatory word for a self proclaimed libertarian who embraces ideas of internationalism and leftism as opposed to nationalism and libertarianism on one or more issues okay well I'm anti new world order and I'm not a left libertarian I'm a right libertarian so I don't so I don't think I really fit the term low bird unless you're going to use the term low bird just to describe all libertarians I think that there's a certain prevalence of that on the right probably you know I mean and I don't I don't entirely agree with that of course you know I still have you know some libertarian leading probably more than I let on actually but yeah there's a certain prevalence of that in the on the right and I think that it's not it's not without you know a certain amount of justification because you know look the libertarian influence I think a lot of libertarians think that you know that they haven't gotten what they wanted politically and a lot of people on the right would say that they have like we're actually seeing the consequences of libertarianism there's an argument to be made you know and I don't agree with that at all I I I didn't think that you would but you know that that thing the idea that you know gay married couples can defend their marijuana farms with unregistered machine guns I mean we're practically there but you know but you can't but you can't you know but you can't just keep your kid home from school or whatever right so like you know it's it's it's it's not the orthodox Rothbardian Hoppy and libertarian animal capitalist society it's that they manage to penetrate enough that left wing social values are not are not sufficiently combated say and that well well I hang on a second I don't think that you're a guy who you know pursues left wing social values and I understand that now you know I think that you're not being accused of that by me but I think that because of that phenomenon that there's a certain a pro there's a certain propriety to trying to denigrate libertarianism as a whole and you say like OK like that force you know that that category of ideas has actually been responsible for a lot of destruction and so we should discredit that entire you know categorical ideological system and you know I think that there's a lot of things that are we're going to do that we're going to do and we're going to do that I think the there's some propriety in that is is what I mean to get out you know all right we'll just jump ahead a little bit and that's a lot to talk about there but I'm just going to jump ahead and get to what I was going to bring up last time and that was there was a debate on it was on YouTube several years ago and it was that John Francois Gary Epi John Francois Gary Epi and he debated David Duke on libertarianism. This was probably on YouTube I don't maybe like in 2017 possibly 20 it was before YouTube got censorship back. Did you see that debate between David Duke and John John Francois on libertarianism? I don't see the debate between David Duke and John Francois on libertarianism. Well it was really good and I thought John Francois won the debate. I'm not saying that David Duke is stupid, he's not a stupid guy. He's a smart guy but so is J.F. J.F. is a really smart guy. He's a very smart guy for sure. They're both smart guys. I saw a good critic to both but I haven't been able to five. I tried to find the debate since then online and tried to find a little bit shoot and I haven't seen it anywhere. I don't even know if it's online anymore so I don't even know if you can watch it now. If it is online I would recommend watching it. But I thought that Duke was making straw man arguments and I thought that John Francois won the debate. Duke was saying things like well libertarianism you know you're all about taking drugs and being a degenerate and that's got nothing to do with the libertarian philosophy. Then he was talking about you know iron ran and like iron ran was Jewish and blah blah blah and that doesn't really have anything to do with it either. I mean first of all the libertarian philosophy was not invented by Jewish people. It existed before that. You know goes back to Europe you know and like the Anglo-Saxons and the Celts and you know various civilizations in Europe. That's where these ideas originally came from. Well later on you know getting into the 1900s you know there were some you know a handful of Jewish people who got involved in the libertarian movement and you know some of them may have made some positive contributions. So maybe not so positive or negative contributions but the philosophy was around long before that. And so I don't think that anyway you know it's been a while since I saw this debate like I said it's been off YouTube ever since they got really strong on censorship. And so I you know I mean it was probably like five or six years ago that I saw this but I don't want to I don't want to put words you know in in in Duke's mouth. But I just remember thinking that he was making straw man arguments and saying things that to try to discredit libertarians that in my opinion we're not accurate. I mean basically the philosophy gets down to property rights the non-aggression principle and when is it appropriate to use for surveillance. Yeah. I think that's about it. That's what I was talking about. Even without even without seeing the debate I know the precise phenomenon that you're talking about you know I know that you've been listening for a while I don't know exactly how long but I mean there's a long time where you know people would call in you know it challenged me on libertarianism and even after I really did identify as libertarianism. I said that libertarianism after I didn't identify as libertarian anymore I still felt compelled to be like well actually you're misinterpreting it because they do not. Oh somebody just posted paper beats rock just posted a link to an archive of that video on alt sensor dot com. And so if anybody wants to find that video it's apparently available there. But I know the phenomenon you're talking about like open borders is the is the classical one that like. They'll always say it's open borders and I'm like well actually you know if you take the theory all the way to do its ultimate logical conclusion you're talking about abolishing comments right you're talking about private property. In in absolute and therefore there's no there's no possibility of mass immigration but of course that has other implications that most libertarians are very uncomfortable with right so like. You know it's not depending on who you're talking to about libertarianism libertarianism can mean a lot of different things say. And I think that you know the the orthodox like Hans Hoppe you know bordering on monarchism sort of libertarian framework is very rational like you can really you can you can totally defend that rationally you know I think that when you try to. You know squeeze this into the context of you know a government that holds individual freedom as the maximum as the highest possible value you're not making certain compromises with it to become more difficult to defend say. But you know it's there's more there's more intellectual good involved in it than I think a lot of the people on the right will give libertarianism credit for but. What is the effect of it right like if you if you look at libertarian activism right what do you see from the libertarian party what do you see from. You know libertarian activist organizations will actually what you see is a lot of like gay sex and drug advocacy right and so well depends on depends on who you're talking about you know which organization and also by the way maybe you're not really following anymore but but the libertarian party is actually shifted a little bit to the right. There was a new group that's come to prominence called the the meesys caucus. Yeah. Yeah so you know some of that stuff is not really going on now you're talking about stuff there was a you know several years ago but but but but we're going with that it depends on what I think you're talking about. Hang on what's like so like but this debate between Gary Epi and Duke right happen probably when it was that was more prevalent I imagine right. Well maybe a little bit but you know the libertarian party movement and all this stuff has been around for a long time and has gone through different phases and you know you just brought up you were talking about the you know happy and anarcho capitalism but then also you talked about you said something about having a government but the government kind of maximizes liberty well you know that brings me to what I was going to say next which was. You know Ron Paul the Ron Paul I think he actually is an anarcho capitalist at heart but when he was running for political office he never ran as that you know he was like a constitutionalist small government constitutionalist and also you know Michael bad dark want to get somebody who was you know influential to you at one point. You know they they didn't talk about you know hey we're going to just abolish the state we're just going to we're going to have a government the you know a government is going to exist and you know the last time I called in you know you basically made the point which I think is valid that you know if the US government ceased to tomorrow something else is going to be the government it could be your you know your neighborhood association or something you know. So I mean depending on how you want to define government you know as long as there's human beings existing in groups there's going to be some sort of a government a family is kind of a government you know mom and dad of the government but anyway I was going to say okay let's just say would you support. A very small government. That maximizes liberty but it has it does not have open borders it exercises some control you have you said before if you exercise some control over who comes into your society you don't have to worry as much about what they're doing so you don't have you exercise some control you have some mechanisms in place to lead people out. And you know maybe maybe you have something where people can come on vacation or maybe come in for a temporary job or business but then they have to leave afterwards and and you know if they don't leave they get kicked out maybe actually have people come and then round them up and kick them out but they don't get rewarded with citizenship and they don't get any taxpayer funded benefits that if they have children while they're here and they're here illegally they don't get taxpayer they don't get citizenship. So anyway would you support a society like that maximizing liberty but not opening it up to everyone on the planet to run it. I suppose that would be a question of what the alternatives were right I mean if you if you're telling me to pick from a menu of Joe Biden's current government or the government that you just described I'll take the one that you just described if it's a choice between me getting what I want and what you just described I'll take what I want it'll be significantly more ready. So I think that what you're describing is somewhere on a spectrum of acceptable ideas say but you know I don't think that I don't think that a society that allowed unrestricted drug use would be far from descending back to where we are or worse right I don't think that a society that has no has no orthodoxy regarding sex is going to be able to sustain itself very long at all and so what you're just describing to me is just hang on a second so like you know I think that there are you know the government has to do things to influence culture the idea that the government can can stick take a step back and just you know allow these things to happen without any control I don't think is real so like what happens is that that that's a way to do that. That that's a fiction and and something steps into fill that vacuum and what's filling that vacuum now is leftism where we say the government tried to say like okay there's no state religion and it became you know it it it took on a religious character of a different sort and it just doesn't call it religion right and and so like those things are inherent in the state I believe and if you don't manage them intelligently then then other things will come in and happen chaoticly go ahead. Okay let me address that okay first of all there were no drug laws in this country for a long time and you know there really wasn't a big problem with drugs before there were drug laws there was no welfare state you know back in the time in the 1800s 17 hundreds early 1900s there was no there was no big problem back then I mean there's there's a few weirdos here and there you know there's a few people that can't handle alcohol but it wasn't any kind of big problem like there has been in the modern era. Second of all you know when the country was founded you know most of the people well it wasn't necessarily a Christian country per se most of the people in it were Christians and help those values they were kind of you know cultural Christians and so there wasn't as much like immorality you know back then back then people got married they had families and stuff like that you're always going to have a few words like that. There's no weirdos on the fringe they're going to you know do weird things or do things that people don't like but here's the thing you don't have any type of welfare state or government programs to subsidize those people so if they engage in risky behaviors and the risky behaviors screw up their life then that's on that you know most people are going to have an economic incentive do not screw up their life and you know like they're like as far as like all the radical feminism and all that stuff that's stuff wouldn't go on the other side. So anywhere without taxpayer funding you know without without taxpayer funding that encourages you know families to break apart women to run off and have kids with you know multiple baby daddies and all this stuff you see today and all the feminism being caught in state subsidized education and then the divorce laws you know the men got changed so men could get you know rape and divorce court. You know none of this stuff would be happening without the state and without the welfare programs so you know theoretically could you have a society of everybody becomes a drug addict degenerate and the whole society falls apart yeah I guess in theory you could have that happen but it wasn't really happening it wasn't really happening to this country until after the government programs came in and screwed things up. Well but how did the government programs come in and screwed things up okay so government programs exactly so so what happens is there are incentives right and then people respond to them and then and then those things are reflected in public policy and so you know if there are people who are you know there's no restrictions on drugs and then people start to use drugs and then the drugs become a problem and then people say bad the drugs and then they bad. And the drugs right or you could have a situation where people are using drugs and the people of the society have some ideology that says well there are a lot of use drugs and then the people who use drugs become so large a number that they want the drug you subsidize and then they pass a law that says that sober people have to pay for their drugs. You know these are the effect I'm not saying that that's what happened I'm saying that you know these are the predictable consequences of an action on the part of people. But when when you do not take action against rising threats in your society right so like a better example would be gay rights say okay that like you know the gay lobby or whatever has these you know things that they want and people were resistant to them. They were like no you know you couldn't even get gay marriage passed in California they they banned it by a referendum in California you know and like and then the Supreme Court comes in and crams it down the throats of all 50 states they throw Kim Davis and Jail and bankrupt her there still going after her for money and and then they're like and then because of that then people stop fighting it and then immediately upon the heels of this then they're like okay now it's tranny bathrooms now it's we're gonna do this to your kids and you know and and you have this massive trans movement and gender ideology has followed right on the heels of the of the overg a full D. V. Hodges decision because people are like okay well you know the Supreme Court is infallible and this has always been in the Constitution and therefore we don't resist it anywhere because there's no resistance now it just it just by leaps and bounds tries to take more territory. And so like you know it's not it's not a direct comparison to what you're talking about but it's it's a similar idea that like if you don't have cultural forces pushing back against the thing then those cultural forces take more right. Yeah well you know as far as the gay marriage thing I mean the first of all the state never sort of got into the marriage licensing business in the first place second of all it attaches like you know like the income tax which is also illegitimate. And there were there were part of the reason the gay is one of the state licenses is so they could get you know breaks on taxes you know file and that one the whole thing of the whole thing. The whole thing of the whole thing of all the whole thing of the whole thing of the whole thing of the whole entire point of the gay marriage thing was to undermine marriage right that was the only purpose of it they they don't. You know very few gays had any interest in getting married I mean it was not something that they were all like oh man you know you know if you know any gay people and I have. Marriage is the last thing on their mind friend okay so like that's not nobody was there was no political force to legalize gay marriage because gays wanted to marry for any reason it was entirely an attack upon that are social our social milieu are our frame of reference right that's that was the purpose of it. And so like it had nothing to do with taxes that's one of the stupid things that they you know it the other one was like well you know you can visit your loved one in the hospital like this is never been a problem you know we were like remember when I was a kid one of our friends. Basically on his deathbed and and he was in the ICU and we all went to go see him and they were like only family members and we had this black kid with us and we were like yeah we're all his brothers and like we all just went in there you know and you know there is no resistance to that and so like you know this idea that you know people were like dying in the hospital and the and the and the and the lover was outside and unable to visit their loved one like these are all these fictions that they told us you know taxes. They don't give a shit about this you know these are all these are all the stories that they pedal I mean Doug are you wrong I mean you know they they use those arguments because they have a reasonable expectation that it gives an air of legitimacy to what they want but fundamentally it was it was a cultural attack is is what it was you know and so like and they understand that very well which is why they win all the time like the reason I think the reason that libertarians you know libertarians had a lot of policy victories but they don't change the general attitude they don't want to they don't convert people ideologically to libertarianism they win on an issue now and then and they they won on a lot of issues but they don't they don't ideologically convert the population because because they're they're disarmed in cultural combat you know the left wages cultural combat very efficiently they're very like they're very adept at that and that's the that's the thing that I'm sort of getting at the like it's not it the policy the public policy the laws are almost irrelevant it's not really the that's not really the contest the contest is the narrative and so like that's why I just think that libertarianism is like impotent in that regard that you know that they're not they're not fighting back against the forces that are actually a threat to freedom and and what I liked about the right wing was that that they were actually like they were fit to the challenge you know that the the libertarians like oh you know we should all just stop using force against one another and the right was like no no no we're going to use force against them because they're the threat to our what we value and I said oh that's that's actually a superior that's a much superior way of dealing with a threat you know okay well this is far as the marriage licensing thing I mean the state shouldn't be involved with that function anyway so that that the whole the whole issue but you see what I'm talking about like this is like an assertion that you make and like but that's you know I understand that there was a period in the history when the government you know wasn't so much involved in marriage but like but that's just asserting that the government shouldn't be involved in marriage is actually not a solution to the problem that's being described right so like the government is involved in marriage and so what is the government going to do the government can either say you know there's a fine there's a theory where the government can say okay we're not in the marriage business anymore but there's absolutely no political force behind that right and so there's these people who say oh well as long as the government's going to be involved in marriage we want the government to bless our marriages too you know and conspicuously those people are not advocating for polygamy say right they they actually would be hostile towards polygene all right they might be like okay let's just have let's destroy the definition of family altogether they'll do that they'll say okay we're going to bless homosexual unions they'll do that they would not for one second recognize like biblical polygene where a man takes more than one wife because they would say that that's patriarchy right so they're they're only invested in it to the extent that it destroys the structures that they're attacking you know what I'm saying and and for libertarians to say okay well we should just not engage in this fight anymore that's what that's what saying no marriage license is that's like you're you're saying okay let's let's let's let's no longer fight about this and the other side still fighting and you're trying to unilaterally disarm and that's that's not it's an impotent way of dealing with a conflict yeah well also you know you brought up but I'm that okay so the gay marriage and legalizing bear a wada and this is because of libertarians and you know so I mean I don't think every time a bill passes and you know if the pro liberty bill or a quasi or semi pro liberty bill but it's necessarily because of libertarians I mean libertarians may have been one force you know speaking in favor or against something in a coalition but like okay there are some states that have passed concealed carry or constitutional carry okay that's that's because you know more of a right wing issue is that also because of libertarians well it is libertarians participate right and so if the left wants to do with the coalition that's what I'm saying so like libertarians being a political minority only accomplish things when they're interests aligned with diverse interests right and so where do their interests end up aligning well it depends on the you know the prevailing winds of culture at the time say okay so you know in New Hampshire they managed to pass constitutional carry while I was still in jail in Charlottesville and that was pretty cool you know but what have their interests aligned subsequent to that well then the democrats took over the the legislature and they started you know abolishing or diminishing our drug laws and now there's junkies dying in the park blocks from me and it's disgusting right and so like you know that you know they're basically grabbing opportunities to advance their agenda bit by bit and when the left is is dominant they're aiding the left in their destruction of civilization and because of that that makes them dangerous and because of and because of the danger that they pose when aligned with the left and it's it's sound it's sound political strategy for right wing or diminished libertarianism as a whole because they don't want people to aid the left in dragging our civilization into the gutter well yeah you know I I've kind of said that you know dismantling government or reducing government is kind of like dismantling a bomb and if you pull the wrong wire out at the wrong time the bomb is going to blow up in your face whether you go and so there has to be kind of an order of operations on how you go about doing things that's why you know I think these people who profess to be libertarians I mean I don't know if they're really libertarians or not but you know who think that it's a great sound idea to rip the border open and have millions of people flooding across the border when we live in a you know de facto democratic welfare state with force to association laws you know that's that's a suicidal policy and the so-called libertarians who who advocate that I don't know if they're just you know naive well maybe some of them are naive and some of them I think are actually just subversive I don't even think they're really libertarians I think they're just you know I think within all these political movements whether it's you know democrat republican libertarian or or something else right wing whatever I think that there are actual staboutors involved in these movements they're there to kind of wreck their their they definitely they definitely exist you know I've talked about cat the rise and what's in some of your view later what do you want to go you know Antonio Bueller and Kathy Ryzenwitz were were you know unambiguously financed by left-wing forces I mean I don't know exactly what the follow the money was on Kathy Ryzenwitz but she was obviously put forth by some well-heeled benefactor who you know she became a prostitute when they pulled the rug but you know she was being financed obviously you know Antonio Bueller there was literally a thing where his group went for went went for a grant from the open societies foundation George Soros' outfit so like you can actually see that you know the peaceful streets project it gotten some grant from some Soros outfit right and so you know that was a real that's a real phenomenon no doubt look we could obviously do this all night friend but we're not going to tonight I've got other people on hold so why don't you why don't you close up with your your strongest point we'll we'll wrap it up okay why was this going to say I think the society that that that maximizes liberty and keeps you know has defense mechanisms in place and keeps people out doesn't have open borders weeds out you know destructive and unwanted people is that it that's what I would desire okay I don't want to live in a police state I don't want to live in a socialist state I don't want to live in a North Korea I reject any kind of like socialism and I want to have you know maximum liberty for myself you know maximum liberty for myself and I think this can be achieved in society by as J.F. said and is actually a view of stuff as well you're just going to have to shut some people out yeah I think that there's a lot a lot of merit to that you know I do think that you know the state you know the state should encourage the domestic population to virtuous behavior I personally believe that and that without some coercion I think that that's difficult to maintain but I want to I want all the things that I want to do I want I want them to be legal I want the freedom to do what I want to do and I want all the people who do things that I don't like to be made to stop and so we'll talk about it again in the future my friend I thank you very much for to call 217 688 1433 like to be on the program and more you talk to less I have to so please do give us a call call or you're on the radical agenda you're with your agenda how you doing Chris doing well friends I know here it's a long time I haven't I called you like right before you got locked up oh well well back to the mill is freaking right before the whole covid lockdowns you you know what's good to speak to you again and run I'm I'm just glad you're out and to speak from the last callers perspective well not from his perspective but from the libertarian like ideology side of things is like the only thing that should be really taking credible in my opinion is the economic side of of libertarianism everything else after that it really doesn't matter so you think that you know the uh that the government should enforce cultural norms but take a hands-off approach to the economy is the idea yeah what do you think about what do you think about um you know the flow of goods and services across the borders well economic trade is I think I think things should be produced locally productive uh predominantly but we should encourage trade with our neighbors you know okay the basic you know if if goods are flowing war is not you know well I I'm sympathetic to that viewpoint I take it very seriously but you know what sort of occurred to me is that you know if the government is going to say you know manage cultural affairs at home like the products and services that come into a place that that's relevant in that right so like if you're going to enforce a certain sexual norms if you're going to you know venerate a certain people as part of the culture then like you can't exactly have you know you can't have you can't have foreigners dumping you know filthy books on the streets say right you you can't have oh absolutely you know your television stations can't be broadcasting for yes they're ed I'm only like economic side of things by um like I mean like the idea of freaking a good solid currency you know gold standard I I could care less about anything outside of that the freaking social norms are important well yes good yes though I mean you know the the the gold standards an interesting idea you know I I was I was so enthralled to the gold standard that I missed out on Bitcoin entirely I know you know I was like oh what are you guys talking about I mean I bought into Bitcoin early in and then I I got out and I've been mining for years and I like when I got into crypto Chris brick and uh dark coin still existed you know what I mean what coin it dark coin dark coin okay I came uh you remember dark coin it was it was like it was when a lot when light coin was still a thing like chasing the curtails of freaking Bitcoin you know right and then they they rebranded themselves from dark coin to well oh uh the dark coin become a narrow oh oh dark coin became now it became dash okay yeah they became dash and if they embraced the you know the the invasive side of the crypto side they went from their original standpoint to embracing you know the control grid more or less but yeah my original call was like what what's your take on have you been keeping up with the whole uh the energy and international justice court case from our uh our difference uh South Africa taking Israel to court no I'm not familiar with the story no yeah the last few days I mean uh the inner I mean Israel's been taken the the international courts apparently like five times four times just the first time they've actually showed up apparently where they've actually sent delegation to appear before the courts but it's pretty interesting I mean there's plenty of video on it you should give it a check out and quite a laugh um I don't want to go isn't it is that we just need to go on top UN court um yes the international justice court for genocide let's see here yeah our good friends South Africa what to know about the international court of justice this is uh hang on a second this goddamn New York times um yeah yeah make me pay for paywall my shut up you Jew prick I'm just trying to read um internationally international court of justice the United Nations highest judicial body held two days of hearings this week in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians and Gaza here's what to know about the court in the case the court based in the hagg oh okay the Netherlands is was established by the founding charter of the United Nations in 1940 I know the hagg yeah the the international court of justice speaking of it in that terminology I didn't recognize but the hagg I recognize obviously was established by the founding charter of the United Nations in 1945 to settle disputes between its member states also known as the world court the ICJ is one of the U.N. six main bodies which include the general assembly in the security council the court typically has a paddle of 15 judges who are elected by the U.N. general assembly and security council in this case Israel and South Africa have each appointed an additional judge to sit on the bench on their behalf how is it different from the international criminal court the international criminal court is also located in the hagg but the it is a distinct court that tries individuals on charges of genocide war crimes and crimes against humanity the ICC opened that investigation into allegations of war crime by Israel and Palestinian militant groups in Gaza and the West Bank in 2021 and has said it will also investigate more recent allegations of war crime since October 7th including the killing of journalists. Israel is not a member of the ICC and does not recognize the jurisdictions the impact of its investigations is unclear but both Israel and South Africa are signatories of the genocide convention which paved the way for the case now before the I.C.J. What comes next in the genocide case after two days of public hearings concluded on Friday with South Africa presenting its case in Israel making its defense the judges will deliberate behind closed doors a final ruling will probably take years to but the court could issue a decision sooner perhaps within weeks on an interim measure seeking to stop Israel's ongoing bombardment of Gaza within weeks the decisions are legally binding with no with no possibility of appeal but the court has few means of enforcing them so that's this little primer here from the uh from the New York Times uh you know yeah I don't know I you know I my views on the it doesn't relate to us I know I mean it's not that it does it relates to us it relates plenty we're financing it's not exactly like but you know it's like the truth of the matter is I've you mentioned that a long time no year I've been I've talked about the Israel-Palestinian thing on here a few times I've never been particularly sympathetic to the to the Palestinian cause it's like you know I'm not you know it's I'm not sympathetic to either one I just I just thought it was interesting and and ironic of South Africa filing you know yeah it's it's amusing in the extreme that it's South Africa yeah um and it's sort of like it sort of serves those Jews right for you know undermining the South African apartheid government right here's a little uh tidbit uh on the whole thing one of one of the plaintiffs that are involved is the international Jewish coalition apparently is one of the plaintiffs on board with South Africa against Israel that's uh is that ironic I mean it's uh there's also like Jewish voices for Eastern United States you know I think that there's it's an interestingly I mean it's it's actually part of the reason that I'm not particularly sympathetic to the Palestinians right some of the most radical like some of the most radical anti-Israel groups are actually Jewish groups right and and the thing is that when you yeah if you if you if you if you observe what it is there if you observe what it is that they're doing it's not that they're it's not that they're like renegade Jews or whatever it's actually that they're like anti-nationalist as a general matter right exactly and exactly and so I'm like well no like actually like you're definitely not on my side like you're actually a deeply subversive force that would that would you know yeah that it's just looking for any opportunity to tack nationalism a general matter like it's it I don't begrudge the Jews their ethno state and and if they have to go that's that's why I'm not totally skeptical of the whole if if they do convict Israel on these charges like is that on purpose is that a larger picture there and I think I think it might be because like go back it go back to the founder of I I mean this is the radical agenda so I can bring this up but the founder of the American national part right I'm sorry um yeah at the founder of the American Nazi party George George with the name right now George Lincoln Rockwell yeah George Lincoln Rockwell and he called a lot of that out is that there's not just one one wave of it there you have two factions and they're both kind of on the same side but not it's that they they they can have the international up the yeah the international Jew versus the Zionist yeah you know and well and there's a well I guess the the international Jew I think was a um that that term is coined I think by actually like Winston Churchill he's talking about you know the international Jew is a separate phenomenon that he was describing from the national Jew which is you know Jews who are citizens of whatever country they're in and they're patriotic to their own country now that's a questionable phenomenon but um you know the Rockwell I am pretty sure was talking about when he referred to the international Jew as the communist yeah the communist Jew well it and of course the there's the I think that when Rockwell is describing this he I'm not familiar precisely with the dichotomy you're talking about from Rockwell what what I would stand out to me from Rockwell is Rockwell's looking at all the Jews as basically internationalists and there's the capitalist and the communists are sort of like these factions that he described them as and that you know you have this you know this idea that no he had hyper connected international claim a lot of his like I've watched a lot of his speeches and he he kind of made it clear about the difference between the international Jew and the Zionists okay like but that he understood that they were two two hands of the same being and two wings of the same bird and ultimately at the end of the day the phenomenon is familiar to me anyway and so you know what they're what they're what they are ultimately doing is they're undermining their their undermining our nations at the end of the day and so whether they have some loyalty to their own nation or not is sort of besides the question as far as our interests are concerned and so but you know in any case that's that's sort of we could we could get into the weeds on that but I think that yeah you know the thing that you bring up about the the court is kind of funny that they're like okay well you know we'll have that it's South Africa of all things it's South Africa and and they're going to be like okay well you know we're going to issue a declaration but they have no means by which to enforce it and it's like you know this this whole thing about this yeah I mean what international courts show trial right it's a basically a show trial it's all it's all just it's it's a big it's a show trial it's exactly what it is it's a it's a way to make a political statement and you know making political statements is not worthless you know there's reasons to do that but that's ultimately what it is and you know if if the court turns around says okay Israel you're not allowed to kill Palestinians anymore than the Jews are going to be like well fuck you our internationalism stops here you know that's they will you know and they'll and they'll know my only concern is like I wish they just wouldn't fucking tie us into their bullshit in the middle of it well that's that's that's the problem with these things you know that they they tie us into everything it's too late for that so kind of yeah so yeah we don't really have a choice in that situation they've got to be extricated you know yeah another another topic go ahead um you hear about apparently they're the fucking neo-J as a accusing um Texas of not allowing border patrol agents to be around the border now yeah so this actually you've seen that article yeah so I actually I'm not intimately familiar with this yet I have the story pulled up in a tab and Tony was mentioning it in the chat um it let me just I'll actually read this thing from revolver while I got you on the phone and then we'll talk about it the Texas National Guard just sees control of eagle pass from the federal government is posted 21 hours ago at revolver news it's like a modern day showdown at the okay corral but this time it's an eagle pass Texas the faceoff is between the Texas National Guard and the Biden regime thanks to a fully fed up governor Greg Abbott Texas has now taken control of Biden's new voter invasion as it stands now the border patrol union has officially confirmed that their agents are being blocked by the Texas National Guard and the union is actually praising Abbott for ceasing control in addition the mayor of eagle pass has revealed that he too was made aware of the plans to take control of his city everyone appears to be in agreement except the Biden regime which will likely challenge this in court quicker than you'd hear about a new Trump indictment here's what Fox News reporter Bill Mollusion had to say in a Twitter post the Texas military department confirms the Texas National Guard has seized control of Shelby Park and Eagle Pass city property where mass illegal crossings are and is restricting border patrol from accessing the area saying the feds perpetuated legal crossings this is the area where border patrol has been cutting Texas razor wire razor wire offenses are now deployed to block the area off from public and federal government attached video is from our crew on the ground this morning as they began blocking it off you can expect the DOJ to sue Texas over this the Texas military department statement reads the Texas National Guard has maintained a presence with security points and temporary barriers in Shelby Park since 2021 the current posture is to prepare for future illegal immigrant surges and to restrict access to organizations that perpetuate illegal immigrant crossings in the park to the greater eagle pass area Bill Mollusion says I reached out to CBP slash border patrol in the sector for comments hours ago no response yet the report is creating a stir online conservatory thrilled to see Republican lawmakers taking decisive action to protect the nation uphold the constitution and look out for actual US citizens who are always lost and forgotten in the shuffle governor Greg Abbott is acting in accordance with what the majority of Americans want across the nation there's a growing frustration with the current border policies under the bottom regime more states should consider adopting as move until it becomes crystal clear to illegals that they're not wanted or welcome and should go back home furthermore those who are here illegally need to go back so that's the story at revolver you know it'll be interesting to see I mean you know the thing at the border is as much a constitutional crisis as the as the Trump indictments okay you're basically saying that you know the the the executive branch shall you know the the oath of office for the executive branch and shall see that the laws are faithfully executed and if the executive branch doesn't do that then you know that they're violating the constitution and then they they put other branches of government in you know this this situation that like okay they have no good options they have to they have to do something to stop the deleterious effects of this you know intentional act you know and so they'll sue and I imagine that if a court says no Greg Abbott you can't do this Greg Abbott will probably back down and like eventually that has to stop yeah I'll probably take it to supreme I think I think Greg Abbott's finally grown a spine or half a spine but they take it to the snow of course to his wheelchair appendent yeah but you know and so that was a little comedic yeah in jab there but I like Greg Abbott he's not a bad dude I think I think he's tougher than some of these guys that have half a spine well you know you know Greg Abbott you know um stands taller than many than many Republicans but that doesn't save very much you know and so yeah you know it's but at the same time he's allowed this to go on for so low I mean even even if he even if he if he just told the supreme court shove it up your ass like today I'm done okay he's allowed millions of people to go in and he keeps on backing off you know it's it's pathetic what's what's happened thus far and and so like even if he went you know full on you know I'm gonna like I'm not gonna listen to you anymore we're stopping this I don't care who says what I mean you you know if he did that today it would still be inefficient insufficient I should say but you know it's better than he does yeah he does something now that efficient but yeah compared to compared to fucking his predecessor that mean his predecessor kind of beats shit yeah and and so you know as as pressure melts you know somebody's gonna stop the show yeah all right buddy I got I got to wrap the show up pretty soon so I'm gonna let you go but I appreciate good to be with you my friend thanks for getting back and touch it and I'll keep in touch with you again yeah if you're not on the mailing list get on at Christopher Cantwell.net slash subscribe and then I'll send you an email whenever we plan a show Monday's Wednesday's in Friday 9 9 30 PM USD's turn thank you very much for to call my friend let's go do those super chats I know that they've been backing up for a little while I appreciate that um Glen 19 asked an hour ago have you ever listened to the interview by Epstein victim Maria Farmer with Whitney Webb it is very revealing what extreme racial supremacist they are it's bond-villainty or evil sooner the sooner they are removed from power the better I haven't seen the interview you're talking about but I understand like I I knew the you know racial supremacist element of some of Jeffrey Epstein's stuff or you know what I had read was not necessarily it wasn't necessarily like explicitly ethnic he he wanted to go and you know it's so as much of his seat as he could conceivably do and he had these ideas about you know superhuman you know a race of superhumans or whatever um I didn't watch the interview that you're discussing so I can't speak intelligently to that but I know that you know Jeffrey Epstein was by no means ignorant of genetics say uh real Tony soprano I read this in my head early I didn't read it out loud but that was when the guy brought it up I I remembered you Tony um he sends uh $17 when when Glen sent that message he sent me $2 thank you Glen uh $17 from Tony soprano he says uh it was nice to see governor Abbott and Texas toss out the feds from Eagle Pass so that Texas troopers could actually seal off the area even made a comment that the only reason they aren't shooting migrants is because the Biden administration would charge them with murder he has his faults but I'm happy um and so you know that's it's gonna have to get to that point literally that like you know you're gonna get to that point like somebody's gonna shoot somebody and then it's gonna be this you know it's gonna get there right it's a good thing that what I just read there it's not the most thorough detail of what all has happened but um the Texas says okay border patrol you're not coming in here like you guys keep on facilitating the illegal immigration so we're just not gonna let you in right and the border patrol apparently is like grateful for this they're like okay well thanks because we don't really want to do it anymore and these people keep ordering us and so now we have an excuse not to do it well you know that's good for now hopefully the Biden administration doesn't get some more obedient people to come in there and start shooting at the Texas National Guard because it's not inconceivable and then you know now you're talking about you know Fort Sumter or something you're talking about Civil War and I really not sure that everybody fully appreciates how close we are to that you know like that's a real possibility it's not I'd old talk anymore okay you're gonna put the president in prison you know you're you're literally getting to that point if you're if you're talking about the National the Texas Guard and the border patrol are now in a violent conflict over a territorial dispute you know I said well they you know he's gonna back off what he goes to the courts and the guy said well you he'll take it to the Supreme Court yeah I get that there's a there's a process and eventually the courts tell you and then people just do it to court say but if the courts are not going to do you don't get the outcome that you need from the courts that eventually you just have to say well fuck your court stupid I'm not gonna let you destroy my country because fucking nine unelected lawyers disagreed right because five out of nine unelected lawyers decided that the federal government supremacy clause is somehow more important than the shall see that the laws are faithfully executed part you know so like you know eventually it's gonna get to that point where or somebody's gonna have to say look here's the real politic you know or uh uh uh like mock politic or or or or wealth politic the politics of force the politics of power you know you're gonna get there Tony again $10 there are literally free drug places in New York and San Francisco they give heroin junkies drugs and a safe place to shoot up also I know from first hand experience was juiced and it give two shits about covid lockdowns and they operated everything completely normally during the shutdowns yeah they did um and it was funny that like I mean I don't know I all I saw was what I saw on television during all of that obviously but I remember it being like this big controversy that like you know that the Jewish groups are like no I'm not taking your vaccines and like all of these you know system apparatus or whatever like well what are you talking about you know the vaccines are part of the loyalty oath and you're part of the you're part of the scam aren't you and they're like yeah well go ahead give it to the goio you know like we need our exemption because we're very special but yeah you know if you're if you're in power then you do whatever you want you know Gavin Newsom can go to the French laundry like you know Nancy Pelosi can go get her hair done and the Jews can go to Chabad or whatever you get to you get to stay home and die thanks Tony libertariat since 1433 I need gay marriage so I can visit my husband in the ICU as he dies of monkey pox that my dog also mysteriously has oh my god the monkey pox thing I still I have to do like a monkey pox episode we're gonna do that when monkey pox is happening oh my god me and Victor boot and and and Matt Hale just laughed so hard every day during the whole like monkey pox scare they tried so hard I wish I had like I had so many great like news clips I just if I my communications weren't so tightly restricted I'd be like go get this go get this go get this I need this for the show that they didn't want to admit what it was you know and like you had this like real is the growing realization that this is like this is spreading amongst gay men you start seeing dogs and children who are in the care of gay men start getting the monkey pox and they're like well you know that's not really yeah it is actually yeah it is that's exactly what it means Tony soprano 777 he sends seven dollars and 77 cents he says they put paper on the windows of their restaurants and keep them open that's pretty fucking funny yeah don't look at here which is I would just put in some putting some paper on the windows not when I try to hide anything oh man so funny man I can't believe all this stuff call you're on the radical agenda what your agenda you need me mr. can well just listen to a bit of the last caller talking about Greg at it and I do absolutely agree that we're here to go through with that that's kind of a jacksonian okay well enforce it I don't know if it's been brought to your attention yet but are you aware of the plum grove development in Texas I'm sorry the plum grove government the plum grove development oh development now I've no I don't know anything about this this is somewhere about 45 minutes ish north east of Houston and there are an estimated 40 to 70 thousand illegals in this development it's a private firm they have something like 900 acres and essentially the developer has been giving private loans to these people so they don't need to get mortgages it's causing massive flooding they basically there's a favela north of Houston and avid and other top Republican officials in Texas have received substantial donations I don't want to give you a number on line to you but from this individual so this individual basically has a a housing development that he's created for the purpose of housing illegal immigrants is the idea and he's and he's giving them essentially private mortgages and and making political contributions to facilitate all of this correct and and how how pointy is his nose or like is it like hook shaped or what I don't I've been following this for a while I have not been able to find they don't tunnel there yeah they don't they don't like to be they don't like to be noticed and so it's very possible yeah well you know I I don't know anything about it but it doesn't it doesn't shock me to hear that it's happening right you know the the people who are doing this are not without resources right they are no no subversive destructive people who you know I've used before that you know maybe these people sort of like sense that you know that what they have is unearned and they want it taken away from them and they destroy everything you know they destroy the place that gave it to them because they on some level know that they don't deserve it and there's an argument we made that that's what's going on you know there's another argument that it's you know more self-interested than that but it it baffles the mind sometimes right it's like it's like you have like you've been made wealthy by this country and now you're going to turn around you're going to ruin it and it's sick it's really terrible no I would I would agree completely they have had a chip on their shoulder ever since Titus put it there for them several thousand years ago yeah not not to be too contrarian just wanted to after the praising of habit to give people who might not be as up to speed with Texas regional politics a bit of insight it makes sense and maybe some some fodder for you going forward it's absurd there are easy articles to find I can try and link so much you'd like but the locals are pissed it's a whole thing so I bet I bet that it is and I thank you very much for the information my friend I thank you very much to call I'm going to wrap it up for the night but I appreciate it and I hope to hear from you again very soon yeah that's that's an interesting one I mean it would explain a lot of what Greg Abbott has done I guess if he's taking contributions from these people who are you know have their entire fortune wrapped up in subsidizing illegal immigration that you know why did it go on as long as it did you know even the you know I thought it was really funny when he started sending the illegals to the other states that was pretty funny you know with respect like that first stunt sending them to um well I guess it was uh it was ronda santa sent them to Martha's vineyard right he had sent them to New York City and then Chicago that was Abbott sent them to New York City in Chicago at first I think and then and then ronda santa sent a bunch of them to Martha's vineyard and there was this huge panic about it and they were all like what you know they had this um I'm remembering the scene where they were like getting them on a bus or something like that right and they sent them forget where they sent them but it was to a republican area for sure I remember that and they had this big like oh yeah we're so we love you all so much we're gonna give you hugs as we put you on the bus and kick you out of our city oh and now like New York City New York City had the story the other day that they they said they told the kids you got to stay home and do remote learning because we're gonna use your school as a housing shelter for the migrants and then they're like okay you can't bring them in here anymore and then Abbott's dropping them on the New Jersey border and it's pretty funny but at the same time it's like well the the you're not putting them there at the inconvenience of the migrants right like they want to go to New York City and you're facilitating their travel you're actually doing this thing that you know you're you're actually facilitating this right you might remember there was the story um broke while I was in prison still that the um there's like an undercover video some cop talking some some guys who are taking them on a plane right and I forget who was running the the plane but the guy who said it said to the cop he's like if people knew you know they knew that the government selling out the American people is like the guys who were operating the airplane knew this you know and I was like that was like a pretty stunning admission you know and it's not stunning because I mean it's obvious but at the same time you don't you don't hear them confess to this very often right that they would say it out loud is is the is the surprising part you know they're usually very good about keeping a tight ship say they dress it all up in their language about justice but we all know we all know and so ladies and gentlemen I've had a good time tonight I love it when the phones are lit like that I really appreciate all the callers tonight thank you so much if you're listening on some other platform at some other time I'd invite you to join us while I program I would really like to have more callers into the show we've got to try to get like new people calling the show more often and get people who disagree with us to call in I we really want to I got to get the the best of surreal politics CD it's like it's basically done I'm going to start I gotta get that out I think that that'll be really good you know that that that doesn't it's not centralized on racial themes there's not a fuck shit or a content every other word and you can introduce people to it that way and if it brings them in then you know we get they'll be exposed to the whole category of thought that's across the network you know it's gonna be it's gonna be really good so I thank you all for for tuning in for listening for calling in especially for the super chats shout out to of course Real Tony soprano is always very generous my friend thank you so much milk trucker thank you and your apologies accepted friend Glenn and libertarian thank you all so much for your financial support this evening thank you to everybody um for your contributions elsewhere give send go dot com slash spm uh the um Christopher can't well dot net slash donate will tell you where all my crypto keys are and stuff like that the uh the cash app edgy chris and man I I think that this is going to be a great year guys I really do I know it's like it's it's it's already the 12th that I'm still talking like it's new years it's so gay don't do that nauseating I get it but there's so much on the horizon and we're gonna do it that's it it's over then we organized the death squads for the people who wrecked America you know what do you call people you can't talk to enemies and if we want to divide our society into you arms counts of enmity all we have to do is keep doing what we're doing a radical agenda of the event has turned into an opportunity to the left to push a racial and radical agenda implemented their radical agenda is the only thing they tell about their bad efforts what they want to do here is ram their radical agenda down your throat this is great americans he's a people that want to see great things for the country you know they try and build a plan here front of a radical agenda it's not a radical agenda it's called the second amendment fuck you pay me